Self‐leadership skills and innovative behavior at work

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between self‐leadership skills and innovative behaviors at work. Design/methodology/approach – The study's participants were employees and their supervisors, working in six organizations in Israel. Data were collected through structured surveys administered to the employees and their supervisors. A total of 175 matched questionnaires were returned. Path analysis, using AMOS program, was conducted to assess the research model. Findings – The results indicate that the three‐dimensional scale of self‐leadership skills is positively associated with both self and supervisor ratings of innovative behaviors. The findings also show that income and job tenure are significantly related to innovative behaviors at work. Practical implications – Organizations that seek ways in which to foster innovative behaviors in their employees, need to recognize the importance of building up self‐leaders who can successfully meet the required expectations and standards of innovative behavior. Originality/value – This research suggests ways for organizations to enhance their innovativeness through employees who possess high self‐leadership skills and receive appropriate extrinsic rewards for their leadership skills and innovative behaviors.

[1]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory , 1989 .

[2]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  Thought self-leadership: the impact of mental strategies training on employee cognition, behavior, and affect' , 1996 .

[3]  P. Tierney,et al.  Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance , 2002 .

[4]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[5]  J. Berry,et al.  Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research , 1986 .

[6]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  4 Product development performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry☆ , 1994 .

[7]  M. Mumford,et al.  Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. , 1988 .

[8]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[9]  Onne Janssen.  Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction , 2001 .

[10]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[11]  Onne Janssen,et al.  How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful , 2004 .

[12]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[13]  H. P. Sims,et al.  The New Superleadership: Leading Others to Lead Themselves , 2001 .

[14]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  Self-leadership and superleadership: The heart and art of creating shared leadership in teams , 2003 .

[15]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Self-regulation through goal setting , 1991 .

[16]  J. Macmurray.  Reason and Emotion , 1972 .

[17]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[18]  Timothy M. Gardner.  Interfirm Competition for Human Resources: Evidence From the Software Industry , 2005 .

[19]  Angela M. Young,et al.  Understanding Creativity in the Workplace: An Examination of Individual Styles and Training in Relation to Creative Confidence and Creative Self-Leadership , 2003 .

[20]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[21]  M. West,et al.  Innovation at work:psychological perspectives , 1989 .

[22]  G. Graen,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: THE RELEVANCE OF TRAITS AND RELATIONSHIPS , 1999 .

[23]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[24]  R. Brislin.  The wording and translation of research instruments. , 1986 .

[25]  C. Carver,et al.  Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior , 1981 .

[26]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[27]  B. Tepper.  Health Consequences of Organizational Injustice: Tests of Main and Interactive Effects , 2001 .

[28]  J. Conger,et al.  All Those Years Ago: The Historical Underpinnings of Shared Leadership , 2003 .

[29]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do , 1997 .

[30]  Fred Luthans,et al.  Behavioral self-management—The missing link in managerial effectiveness , 1979 .

[31]  Carolyn Copper,et al.  Does mental practice enhance performance , 1994 .

[32]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[33]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Self-Management as a Substitute for Leadership: A Social Learning Theory Perspective , 1980 .

[34]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[35]  Christopher P. Neck,et al.  Mastering self-leadership: empowering yourself for personal excellence, second edition , 1991 .

[36]  Christopher P. Neck,et al.  The revised self‐leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self‐leadership , 2002 .

[37]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization , 2000 .

[38]  Joyce K. Fletcher,et al.  Shared Leadership: Paradox and Possibility , 2003 .

[39]  Jane M. Howell.  The right stuff: Identifying and developing effective champions of innovation , 2005 .

[40]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Affect and Creativity at Work: A Daily Longitudinal Test. , 2003 .

[41]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[42]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  Thought self-leadership: The influence of self-talk and mental imagery on performance , 1992 .

[43]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research , 1994 .

[44]  M. Mumford,et al.  Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships , 2002 .

[45]  A. Ellis.  Reason and emotion in psychotherapy , 1962 .

[46]  M. West,et al.  The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation:a special issue introduction , 2004 .

[47]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[48]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  Self‐leadership and performance outcomes: the mediating influence of self‐efficacy , 1998 .

[49]  Charles C. Manz.  Self-Leadership: Toward an Expanded Theory of Self-Influence Processes in Organizations , 1986 .

[50]  Anne Nelson.  Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering Yourself for Personal Excellence , 2000 .

[51]  A. Furnham.  The Protestant Work Ethic , 2021 .

[52]  R. Burns,et al.  Relation of Aptitudes to Learning at Different Points in Time during Instruction. , 1980 .

[53]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 1996 .

[54]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[55]  Craig L. Pearce,et al.  Book Review: Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership , 2005 .