Does E‐learning Policy Drive Change in Higher Education?: A case study relating models of organisational change to e‐learning implementation

Due to the heightened competition introduced by the potential global market and the need for structural changes within organisations delivering e‐content, e‐learning policy is beginning to take on a more significant role within the context of educational policy per se. For this reason, it is becoming increasingly important to establish what effect such policies have and how they are achieved. This paper addresses this question, illustrating five ways in which change is understood (Fordist, evolutionary, ecological, community of practice and discourse‐oriented) and then using this range of perspectives to explore how e‐learning policy drives change (both organisational and pedagogic) within a selected higher education institution. The implications of this case are then discussed, and both methodological and pragmatic conclusions are drawn, considering the relative insights offered by the models and ways in which change around e‐learning might be supported or promoted.

[1]  J. Barton,et al.  Quality assurance for digital learning object repositories: issues for the metadata creation process , 2004 .

[2]  Mine Karatas-Ozkan,et al.  Changing Conversations in Organizations: A Complexity Approach to Change , 2004 .

[3]  A. Friedlander.  Information ecologies: using technology with heart , 2003 .

[4]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Towards a Unified E-learning Strategy: Consultation Document , 2003 .

[5]  Paul Joyce,et al.  Examining the five-stage e-moderating model: designed and emergent practice in the learning technology profession , 2003 .

[6]  Bill Davey,et al.  ICT and Training: A Proposal for an Ecological Model of Innovation , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Gráinne Conole.  The evolving landscape of learning technology research , 2002 .

[8]  M. Grant,et al.  Communities of practice. , 2020, Health progress.

[9]  L. Farrell.  Negotiating Knowledge in the Knowledge Economy: Workplace educators and the politics of codification , 2001 .

[10]  M. David Merrill,et al.  Components of instruction toward a theoretical tool for instructional design , 2001 .

[11]  Ray Land,et al.  Agency, context and change in academic development , 2001 .

[12]  Patricia A. Galagan.  THE E-LEARNING REVOLUTION , 2000 .

[13]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Pedagogy and New Power Relationships , 2000 .

[14]  T. Brooks.  Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[15]  David F. Noble,et al.  Perspectives: Digital diploma mills: the automation of higher education , 1998, NTWK.

[16]  Arthur L. Norberg,et al.  Trapped in the net: The unanticipated consequences of computerization , 1998 .

[17]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[18]  L Elton.  Managing change in higher education: A learning environment architecture - Ford,P, Goodyear,P, Hesteltine,R, Lewis,R, Darby,J, Graves,J, Sartorius,P, Harwood,D, King,T , 1997 .

[19]  Peter Ford,et al.  Managing change in higher education : a learning environment architecture , 1996 .

[20]  M. Fullan.  Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. School Development and the Management of Change Series: 10. , 1993 .

[21]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[22]  P. Senge.  THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[23]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[24]  D. Campbell.  Variation and Selective retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution , 1965 .