Validation of Auscultation Technologies using Objective and Clinical Comparisons

Technology is rapidly changing the health care industry. As new systems and devices are developed, validating their effectiveness in practice is not trivial, yet it is essential for assessing their technical and clinical capabilities. Digital auscultations are new technologies that are changing the landscape of diagnosis of lung and heart sounds and revamping the centuries old original design of the stethoscope. Here, we propose a methodology to validate a newly developed digital stethoscope, and compare its effectiveness against a market-accepted device, using a combination of signal properties and clinical assessments. Data from 100 pediatric patients is collected using both devices side by side in two clinical sites. Using the proposed methodology, we objectively compare the technical performance of the two devices, and identify clinical situations where performance of the two devices differs. The proposed methodology offers a general approach to verify a new digital auscultation device as clinically-viable; while highlighting the important consideration for clinical conditions in performing these evaluations.

[1]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  Computerised lung sound analysis to improve the specificity of paediatric pneumonia diagnosis in resource-poor settings: protocol and methods for an observational study , 2012, BMJ Open.

[2]  P. Boersma ACCURATE SHORT-TERM ANALYSIS OF THE FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY AND THE HARMONICS-TO-NOISE RATIO OF A SAMPLED SOUND , 1993 .

[3]  R Spagnolo,et al.  A computer system for timing and acoustical analysis of crackles: a study in cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. , 1984, Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire.

[4]  H. Pasterkamp,et al.  Respiratory sounds. Advances beyond the stethoscope. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[5]  Robert H. Gilman,et al.  Developing a Reference of Normal Lung Sounds in Healthy Peruvian Children , 2014, Lung.

[6]  Powen Ru,et al.  Multiresolution spectrotemporal analysis of complex sounds. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Tielsch,et al.  Computerized lung sound analysis as diagnostic aid for the detection of abnormal lung sounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Respiratory medicine.

[8]  Kuansan Wang,et al.  Auditory representations of acoustic signals , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Suneeti Nathani Iyer,et al.  Fundamental frequency development in typically developing infants and infants with severe‐to‐profound hearing loss , 2008, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[10]  A. Vyshedskiy,et al.  Automated Analysis of Crackles in Patients with Interstitial Pulmonary Fibrosis , 2010, Pulmonary medicine.

[11]  Dror Lederman,et al.  Estimation of Infants' Cry Fundamental Frequency using a Modified SIFT algorithm , 2010, ArXiv.

[12]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  Characterization of noise contaminations in lung sound recordings , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).