The prevalence of preanalytical errors in a Croatian ISO 15189 accredited laboratory

Abstract Background: The preanalytical phase is the most common source of laboratory errors. The goal of this descriptive study was to analyze the prevalence and type of preanalytical errors in relation to the site of sample collection (inpatient vs. outpatient) and the type of laboratory unit (hematology and coagulation vs. biochemistry). For the biochemistry unit, the data were also analyzed relative to the type of the analysis (stat vs. routine). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the sample and test request form error rate for a 1-year period, from January to December 2008. Results: The frequency of the sample errors differed significantly between the emergency and routine biochemistry unit (0.69% vs. 2.14%; p<0.0001), and between inpatients and outpatients (1.12% vs. 1.36%; p=0.0006). Hemolysis was the most frequent sample error, accounting for 65% of all unsuitable specimens in the emergency biochemistry unit. The total sample error rate did not differ between hematology and coagulation vs. the biochemistry unit. The frequency of test request form errors differed significantly with respect to the sample collection site (p<0.0001), laboratory unit (p<0.0001) and type of the analysis (p<0.0001). Errors in the test request form were least frequent in the outpatient unit (2.98%) and most frequent in the routine biochemistry unit (65.94%). Conclusions: Sample and test request form errors in our laboratory are occurring with a frequency comparable to that reported by others. Continuous educational action is needed for all stakeholders involved in laboratory testing to improve the quality of the preanalytical phase of the total testing process. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1009–14.

[1]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  To Err is Human , 2000 .

[2]  Giuseppe Lippi,et al.  Development of a preanalytical errors recording software , 2010 .

[3]  W. Faquin,et al.  Frozen section of thyroid and parathyroid specimens. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of the hemolysis index in automated clinical chemistry systems , 2009, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[5]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Laboratory errors: How to improve pre- and post-analytical phases? , 2007 .

[6]  The skilled phlebotomist. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  G. Lippi,et al.  Survey on the prevalence of hemolytic specimens in an academic hospital according to collection facility: opportunities for quality improvement , 2009, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[8]  Andrea Mosca,et al.  Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories , 2007, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[9]  G. Lippi,et al.  Prevalence and type of pre-analytical problems for inpatients samples in coagulation laboratory. , 2008, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[10]  Mario Plebani,et al.  The IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patient safety. , 2009, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[11]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories , 2008, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[12]  G. Lippi,et al.  Phlebotomy issues and quality improvement in results of laboratory testing. , 2006, Clinical Laboratory.

[13]  Giuseppe Lippi,et al.  Governance of preanalytical variability: travelling the right path to the bright side of the moon? , 2009, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[14]  M. Escuer,et al.  Quality indicators and specifications for key processes in clinical laboratories: a preliminary experience , 2007, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[15]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Total quality in laboratory diagnostics. It’s time to think outside the box. , 2010 .

[16]  G. Lippi,et al.  To err is human. To misdiagnose might be deadly. , 2010, Clinical biochemistry.

[17]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Self reported routines and procedures for the extra-analytical phase of laboratory practice in Croatia - cross-sectional survey study , 2010 .

[18]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. , 2007, Clinical chemistry.

[19]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Errors in laboratory medicine. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[20]  A. B. Cobb Quality indicators. , 1999, Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association.

[21]  K. Ryder,et al.  Erroneous laboratory results from hemolyzed, icteric, and lipemic specimens. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[22]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Comparison of visual vs. automated detection of lipemic, icteric and hemolyzed specimens: can we rely on a human eye? , 2009, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[23]  G. Lippi,et al.  Preanalytic error tracking in a laboratory medicine department: results of a 1-year experience. , 2006, Clinical chemistry.