Mesoscale influence on long-range transport — evidence from ETEX modelling and observations

Abstract During the first European Tracer Experiment (ETEX) tracer gas was released from a site in Brittany, France, and subsequently observed over a range of 2000 km. Hourly measurements were taken at the National Environmental Research Institute (NERI) located at Riso, Denmark, using two measurement techniques. At this location, the observed concentration time series shows a double-peak structure occurring between two and three days after the release. By using the Danish Emergency Response Model of the Atmosphere (DERMA), which is developed at the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI), simulations of the dispersion of the tracer gas have been performed. Using numerical weather-prediction data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) by DERMA, the arrival time of the tracer is quite well predicted, so also is the duration of the passage of the plume, but the double-peak structure is not reproduced. However, using higher-resolution data from the DMI version of the HIgh Resolution Limited Area Model (DMI-HIRLAM), DERMA reproduces the observed structure very well. The double-peak structure is caused by the influence of a mesoscale anti-cyclonic eddy on the tracer gas plume about one day earlier.

[1]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  Eddy Diffusivity and Countergradient Transport in the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 1991 .

[2]  L. Mahrt,et al.  The Nocturnal Surface Inversion and Influence of Clear-Air Radiative Cooling , 1982 .

[3]  P. Zannetti.  Air Pollution Meteorology , 1990 .

[4]  I. Troen,et al.  A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation , 1986 .

[5]  S. Mosca,et al.  The European Long Range Tracer Experiment (ETEX): Preliminary Evaluation of Model Intercomparison Exercise , 1996 .

[6]  R. H. Maryon,et al.  The U.K. nuclear accident model , 1991 .

[7]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Evaluation and model impacts of alternative boundary-layer height formulations , 1996 .

[8]  Jerzy Bartnicki,et al.  A real time dispersion model for severe nuclear accidents, tested in the European tracer experiment , 1996 .

[9]  F. A. Gifford,et al.  The random force theory: Application to meso- and large-scale atmospheric diffusion , 1984 .

[10]  P. Wetzel.  Toward parameterization of the stable boundary layer , 1982 .

[11]  A. Simmons,et al.  An Energy and Angular-Momentum Conserving Vertical Finite-Difference Scheme and Hybrid Vertical Coordinates , 1981 .

[12]  F. A. Gifford,et al.  Horizontal diffusion in the atmosphere: A Lagrangian-dynamical theory , 1982 .

[13]  W. Klug,et al.  Evaluation of long range atmospheric transport models using environmental radioactivity data from the Chernobyl accident : the ATMES report , 1992 .

[14]  F. B. Smith.  Conditioned particle motion in a homogeneous turbulent field , 1968 .

[15]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  Diffusion by Continuous Movements , 1922 .

[16]  Jens Havskov Sørensen,et al.  Sensitivity of the DERMA long-range Gaussian dispersion model to meteorological input and diffusion parameters , 1998 .

[17]  F. Girardi,et al.  The European Tracer Experiment Experimental Results and Database , 1998 .

[18]  Larry Mahrt,et al.  Modelling the depth of the stable boundary-layer , 1981 .

[19]  D. Williams,et al.  Measurements of relative σy up to 1800 km from a single source , 1988 .

[20]  A. Rasmussen,et al.  Forecast of atmospheric boundary-layer height utilised for ETEX real-time dispersion modelling , 1996 .

[21]  A. Arakawa.  Computational design for long-term numerical integration of the equations of fluid motion: two-dimen , 1997 .