Use of Tekscan K-Scan Sensors for Retropatellar Pressure Measurement Avoiding Errors during Implantation and the Effects of Shear Forces on the Measurement Precision

Pressure-sensitive K-Scan 4000 sensors (Tekscan, USA) provide new possibilities for the dynamic measurement of force and pressure in biomechanical investigations. We examined the sensors to determine in particular whether they are also suitable for reliable measurements of retropatellar forces and pressures. Insertion approaches were also investigated and a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy supplemented by parapatellar sutures proved to be the most reliable method. The ten human cadaver knees were tested in a knee-simulating machine at a torque of 30 and 40 Nm. Each test cycle involved a dynamic extension from 120° flexion. All recorded parameters showed a decrease of 1-2% per measurement cycle. Although we supplemented the sensors with a Teflon film, the decrease, which was likely caused by shear force, was significant. We evaluated 12 cycles and observed a linear decrease in parameters up to 17.2% (coefficient of regression 0.69–0.99). In our opinion, the linear decrease can be considered a systematic error and can therefore be quantified and accounted for in subsequent experiments. That will ensure reliable retropatellar usage of Tekscan sensors and distinguish the effects of knee joint surgeries from sensor wear-related effects.

[1]  W. Herzog,et al.  Effects of inserting a pressensor film into articular joints on the actual contact mechanics. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  J. E. Hale,et al.  Contact stress gradient detection limits of Pressensor film. , 1992, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  Sean D Smith,et al.  Tekscan pressure sensor output changes in the presence of liquid exposure. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  J. Tan,et al.  The effect of tibial tuberosity realignment procedures on the patellofemoral pressure distribution , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  MEASURING CONTACT PRESSURE AND CONTACT AREA IN ORTHOPEDIC APPLICATIONS : FUJI FILM VS . TEKSCAN , 2000 .

[6]  C Hurschler,et al.  Comparison of Capacitive versus Resistive Joint Contact Stress Sensors , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  W R Walsh,et al.  Intraoperative assessment of tibiofemoral contact stresses in total knee arthroplasty. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  Markus Wünschel,et al.  Increased patellofemoral pressure after TKA: an in vitro study , 2014, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  J. Fulkerson The effects of medialization and anteromedialization of the tibial tubercle on patellofemoral mechanics and kinematics. , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  T. Fukubayashi,et al.  The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee. A study of normal and osteoarthrotic knee joints. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[11]  C. J. Wirth,et al.  Dynamische In-vitro-Messung des retropatellaren Drucks nach alloplastischem Kniegelenkersatz , 2003, Der Orthopäde.

[12]  M. Harris,et al.  An improved method for measuring tibiofemoral contact areas in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of K-scan sensor and Fuji film. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  V. Harder,et al.  Effects of sterilization on the Tekscan digital pressure sensor. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  N SHINNO Statico-dynamic analysis of movement of the knee. III. Functional significance of the flexors and extensors of the knee. , 1961, The Tokushima journal of experimental medicine.

[15]  W R Walsh,et al.  A novel method for measuring medial compartment pressures within the knee joint in-vivo. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  C. Hurschler,et al.  Biomechanical and Kinematic Influences of a Total Infrapatellar Fat Pad Resection on the Knee , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[17]  C J Wirth,et al.  [Dynamic in vitro measurement of retropatellar pressure after knee arthroplasty]. , 2003, Der Orthopade.

[18]  W. Walsh,et al.  Tibiofemoral contact areas and pressures in six high flexion knees , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[19]  D. Wilson,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of a pressure measurement system in the patellofemoral joint. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  David R Wilson,et al.  Evaluation of a computational model used to predict the patellofemoral contact pressure distribution. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Christof Hurschler,et al.  Dynamic measurement of patellofemoral contact pressure following reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament: an in vitro study. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  C. Hurschler,et al.  Dynamic measurement of patellofemoral kinematics and contact pressure after lateral retinacular release: an in vitro study , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[23]  G. Li,et al.  The effect of tibiofemoral joint kinematics on patellofemoral contact pressures under simulated muscle loads , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.