Gel point as a measure of cellulose nanofibre quality and feedstock development with mechanical energy

The gel point is the lowest solids content at which a fibre suspension forms a continuously connected network and is related to the fibre aspect ratio. In this paper we firstly investigated the conditions required to accurately measure a gel point using sedimentation. We found that very heavily treated cellulose nanofibres can produce anomalous sedimentation data, due to the electrostatic repulsion from fibre surface charges dominating the gravity driven sedimentation. Screening the anionic surface charges by adding high levels of Na+ or Ca2+ ions reduced the electrostatic interactions between the fibres and allowed them to settle normally. Gel point measurement was then used to probe the development of nanofibre quality with increasing energy input for three different feedstocks: eucalypt kraft pulp, commercial microfibrillated cellulose and de-lignified, bleached spinifex pulp. By combining the data of the aspect ratio and average diameter, determined from SEM and TEM, we were able to compare the differences in feedstock processability. The aspect ratio of all three feedstocks increased with increasing homogenisation energy, showing that the fibre delamination dominated over fibre shortening. The slope of the aspect ratio versus energy consumption showed the ease of processing of each sample. The spinifex fibres had the fastest rate of aspect ratio increase and therefore were the most processable. Gel point is an excellent tool to track quality development of nanocellulose through processing and to compare the potential of different feedstocks for nanocellulose production.

[1]  R. Venditti,et al.  The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: mechanical processing and physical properties. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[2]  L. Segal',et al.  An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-Ray Diffractometer , 1959 .

[3]  Gunnar Henriksson,et al.  An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers , 2007 .

[4]  Daisuke Ishii,et al.  Determination of nanocellulose fibril length by shear viscosity measurement , 2014, Cellulose.

[5]  A. N. Nakagaito,et al.  Nano-fibrillation of pulp fibers for the processing of transparent nanocomposites , 2007 .

[6]  Marielle Henriksson,et al.  Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[7]  L. Piergiovanni,et al.  The Potential of NanoCellulose in the Packaging Field: A Review , 2015 .

[8]  M. Hubbe,et al.  Enhanced Absorbent Products Incorporating Cellulose and Its Derivatives: A Review , 2013 .

[9]  R. J. Kerekes,et al.  Flocculation of cellulose fibres: new comparison of crowding factor with percolation and effective-medium theories , 2009 .

[10]  Lucian A. Lucia,et al.  CELLULOSIC NANOCOMPOSITES: A REVIEW , 2008 .

[11]  O. Ikkala,et al.  Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[12]  Hiroyuki Yano,et al.  The effect of morphological changes from pulp fiber towards nano-scale fibrillated cellulose on the mechanical properties of high-strength plant fiber based composites , 2004 .

[13]  Paul Memmott,et al.  Isolation of cellulose nanofibrils from Triodia pungens via different mechanical methods , 2015, Cellulose.

[14]  M. Ankerfors.  Microfibrillated cellulose : Energy-efficient preparation techniques and key properties , 2012 .

[15]  Zhijun Shi,et al.  Nanocellulose electroconductive composites. , 2013, Nanoscale.

[16]  Swambabu Varanasi,et al.  Estimation of cellulose nanofibre aspect ratio from measurements of fibre suspension gel point , 2013, Cellulose.

[17]  Akira Isogai,et al.  Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[18]  M. Nogi,et al.  Optically transparent composites reinforced with plant fiber-based nanofibers , 2005 .

[19]  J. Hamilton,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility , 1983 .

[20]  Janne Laine,et al.  Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength , 2010 .

[21]  Daisuke Ishii,et al.  Viscoelastic evaluation of average length of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[22]  Tom Lindström,et al.  High strength, flexible and transparent nanofibrillated cellulose-nanoclay biohybrid films with tunable oxygen and water vapor permeability. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[23]  Anand R. Sanadi,et al.  Preparation and Characterization of Cellulose Nanofibers from Two Commercial Hardwood and Softwood Pulps , 2009 .

[24]  David Plackett,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review , 2010 .

[25]  M. Sain,et al.  Modeling energy consumption for the generation of microfibres from bleached kraft pulp fibres in a PFI mill , 2007, BioResources.

[26]  A. Naderi,et al.  The state of carboxymethylated nanofibrils after homogenization-aided dilution from concentrated suspensions: a rheological perspective , 2014, Cellulose.

[27]  Akira Isogai,et al.  Introduction of aldehyde groups on surfaces of native cellulose fibers by TEMPO-mediated oxidation , 2006 .

[28]  Paul Memmott,et al.  Easily deconstructed, high aspect ratio cellulose nanofibres from Triodia pungens; an abundant grass of Australia's arid zone , 2015 .

[29]  Swambabu Varanasi,et al.  Effect of cellulose nanofiber dimensions on sheet forming through filtration , 2012, Cellulose.

[30]  K. R. Sandberg,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential , 1983 .

[31]  Richard A. Venditti,et al.  The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: water interactions and physical properties for packaging applications , 2010 .

[32]  Ryan Mills,et al.  Adhesion and Surface Issues in Cellulose and Nanocellulose , 2008 .

[33]  R. J. Kerekes,et al.  CHARACTERIZING THE MOBILITY OF PAPERMAKING FIBRES DURING SEDIMENTATION , 2018 .

[34]  B. Hinterstoisser,et al.  Sugar beet cellulose nanofibril-reinforced composites , 2007 .

[35]  Alain Dufresne,et al.  Mechanical behavior of sheets prepared from sugar beet cellulose microfibrils , 1997 .

[36]  M. Ioelovich.  Cellulose as a nanostructured polymer: A short review , 2008, BioResources.

[37]  Akira Isogai,et al.  Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[38]  L. Kong,et al.  Homogeneous isolation of nanocellulose from sugarcane bagasse by high pressure homogenization. , 2012, Carbohydrate polymers.

[39]  Dieter Klemm,et al.  Nanocelluloses: A New Family of Nature-Based Materials , 2011 .

[40]  L. V. Welch,et al.  Characterization of the PFI mill by the C-factor , 1994 .

[41]  M. Sain,et al.  Biocomposites from wheat straw nanofibers: Morphology, thermal and mechanical properties , 2008 .

[42]  Per Stenstad,et al.  Chemical surface modifications of microfibrillated cellulose , 2008 .

[43]  K. Uetani,et al.  Nanofibrillation of wood pulp using a high-speed blender. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[44]  Julien Bras,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose - its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. , 2012, Carbohydrate polymers.

[45]  Swambabu Varanasi,et al.  Effect of cationic polyacrylamide on the processing and properties of nanocellulose films. , 2015, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[46]  W. Batchelor,et al.  Superior non-woven sheet forming characteristics of low-density cationic polymer-cellulose nanofibre colloids , 2014, Cellulose.