A method to define public transit opportunity space

A public transit performance measure quantifying the ease of reaching a destination from a given location is important for describing the efficiency and convenience of public transit. In this paper, a new method for quantifying public transit performance, the Transit Opportunity Index (TOI), is presented. This measure accounts for both transit accessibility (the level of access to the transit system) and transit connectivity (the system’s provision of services between origins and destinations) by combining measures of spatial coverage, temporal coverage, and trip coverage. Spatial and temporal coverage measures are calculated using an origin–destination (O–D) representation of the transit network and then combined to create a transit accessibility score for each O–D pair. Transit accessibility is weighted by a binary connectivity parameter and a connectivity decay factor. The connectivity decay factor is derived from a travel time-based logistic function to reflect the decreasing connectivity with increasing travel time. The binary connectivity parameter and the connectivity decay factor are used to account for trip coverage, or transit connectivity. The Transit Opportunity Index (TOI) is then applied to the bus network of the city of New Haven, Connecticut. The results of this case study suggest that the TOI is a more complete and practical measure of public transit service performance than previously established measures. This method also has the potential to identify transfer zones for public transit trips between O–D pairs without direct connections. However, the TOI is most powerful when used in conjunction with a public transit demand measure to identify underserved areas.

[1]  Yang Jiang,et al.  Walk the line: station context, corridor type and bus rapid transit walk access in Jinan, China , 2011 .

[2]  Nicholas E. Lownes,et al.  A Composite Index of Public Transit Accessibility , 2011 .

[3]  R. D. Ramsey,et al.  ANALYSIS OF TRANSIT SERVICE AREAS USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1992 .

[4]  G. Currie.  Gap Analysis of Public Transport Needs:Measuring Spatial Distribution of Public Transport Needs and Identifying Gaps in the Quality of Public Transport Provision , 2004 .

[5]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Public Transit Network Connectivity , 2010 .

[6]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Development of Indicators of Opportunity-Based Accessibility , 2011 .

[7]  S. Mavoa,et al.  GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand , 2012 .

[8]  Alan T. Murray.  Strategic analysis of public transport coverage , 2001 .

[9]  Edward A Beimborn,et al.  Accessibility, Connectivity, and Captivity: Impacts on Transit Choice , 2003 .

[10]  Jian Lu,et al.  Use of Geographic Information System for Analysis of Transit Pedestrian Access , 1997 .

[11]  S. Derrible,et al.  Network Analysis of World Subway Systems Using Updated Graph Theory , 2009 .

[12]  Graham Currie,et al.  Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs , 2010 .

[13]  Nicholas E Lownes,et al.  Measuring Service Gaps , 2011 .

[14]  Zhong-ren Peng,et al.  A simultaneous route-level transit patronage model: demand, supply, and inter-route relationship , 1997 .

[15]  Darren M. Scott,et al.  Network Robustness Index : a new method for identifying critical links and evaluating the performance of transportation networks , 2006 .

[16]  W. Lam,et al.  BUS PASSENGER WALKING DISTANCES AND WAITING TIMES: A SUMMER-WINTER COMPARISON , 1981 .

[17]  Sigurd Grava,et al.  Urban Transportation Systems. Choices for Communities , 2003 .

[18]  G. Currie,et al.  Using Lorenz Curves to Assess Public Transit Equity , 2011 .

[19]  S. K. Jason Chang,et al.  Modeling Passenger Waiting Time for Intermodal Transit Stations , 2001 .

[20]  Javier Gutiérrez,et al.  Transit ridership forecasting at station level: an approach based on distance-decay weighted regression , 2011 .

[21]  Fang Zhao,et al.  Forecasting Transit Walk Accessibility: Regression Model Alternative to Buffer Method , 2003 .

[22]  Tenny N Lam,et al.  CONNECTIVITY INDEX FOR SYSTEMWIDE TRANSIT ROUTE AND SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE , 1982 .

[23]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Measuring Public Transport Connectivity Performance Applied in Auckland, New Zealand , 2009 .

[24]  Ruihong Huang,et al.  Analyzing Neighborhood Accessibility via Transit in a GIS Environment , 2002, Ann. GIS.

[25]  Paul Ryus,et al.  Development of Florida’s Transit Level-of-Service Indicator , 2000 .

[26]  Liping Fu,et al.  A New Performance Index for Evaluating Transit Quality of Service , 2007 .

[27]  Keumsook Lee,et al.  A New Algorithm for Graph‐theoretic Nodal Accessibility Measurement , 2010 .

[28]  Sony Sulaksono Wibowo,et al.  Modeling walking accessibility to public transport terminals: case study of singapore mass rapid transit , 2005 .

[29]  Ram M. Pendyala,et al.  Development of Time-of-Day–Based Transit Accessibility Analysis Tool , 2002 .

[30]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  Using GIS to Measure the Effect of Overlapping Service Areas on Passenger Boardings at Bus Stops , 2007 .

[31]  M. Kuby,et al.  Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States , 2004 .

[32]  Kevin M. Curtin,et al.  A new method for determining the population with walking access to transit , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[33]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Integrating attribute and space characteristics in choropleth display and spatial data mining , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[34]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Accessibility Indices: Pilot Study and Potential Use in Strategic Planning , 1999 .