Addressing the sparsity of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy data with randomized sparse principal component analysis

Emission spectra yielded by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) exhibit high dimensionality, redundancy, and sparsity. The high dimensionality is often addressed by principal component analysis (PCA) which creates a low dimensional embedding of the spectra by projecting them into the score space. However, PCA does not effectively deal with the sparsity of the analysed data, including LIBS spectra. Consequently, sparse PCA (SPCA) was proposed for the analysis of high-dimensional sparse data. Nevertheless, SPCA remains underutilized for LIBS applications. Thus, in this work, we show that SPCA combined with genetic algorithms offers marginal improvements in clustering and quantification using multivariate calibration. More importantly, we show that SPCA significantly improves the interpretability of loading spectra. Finally, by using the randomized SPCA (RSPCA) algorithm for carrying out SPCA, we indirectly demonstrate that the analysis of LIBS data can greatly benefit from the tools developed by randomized linear algebra: RSPCA offers a 20-fold increase in computation speed compared to PCA based on singular value decomposition.

[1]  M. Saccoccio,et al.  The ChemCam Instrument Suite on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover: Science Objectives and Mast Unit Description , 2012 .

[2]  Reinhard Noll,et al.  LIBS analyses for industrial applications – an overview of developments from 2014 to 2018 , 2018 .

[3]  N. Senesi,et al.  Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) to measure quantitatively soil carbon with emphasis on soil organic carbon. A review. , 2016, Analytica chimica acta.

[4]  Cai R. Ytsma,et al.  Effects of univariate and multivariate regression on the accuracy of hydrogen quantification with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy , 2018 .

[5]  Alex Fraser,et al.  Simulation of Genetic Systems by Automatic Digital Computers I. Introduction , 1957 .

[6]  Cécile Fabre,et al.  Classification of challenging Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy soil sample data - EMSLIBS contest , 2020, Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy.

[7]  Nicoló Omenetto,et al.  Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS), Part II: Review of Instrumental and Methodological Approaches to Material Analysis and Applications to Different Fields , 2012, Applied spectroscopy.

[8]  Yixiang Duan,et al.  Progress of Chemometrics in Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Analysis , 2015 .

[9]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Influence of baseline subtraction on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopic data , 2018 .

[10]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparse Principal Component Analysis , 2006 .

[11]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy as a promising tool in the elemental bioimaging of plant tissues , 2020 .

[12]  A. Giacomo,et al.  Laser-induced plasma expansion: theoretical and experimental aspects , 2004 .

[13]  Cai R. Ytsma,et al.  Accuracies of lithium, boron, carbon, and sulfur quantification in geological samples with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy in Mars, Earth, and vacuum conditions , 2019 .

[14]  Israel Schechter,et al.  Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) : fundamentals and applications , 2006 .

[15]  Cancan Yi,et al.  A novel baseline correction method using convex optimization framework in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy quantitative analysis , 2017 .

[16]  Cancan Yi,et al.  Laser-induced Breakdown spectroscopy quantitative analysis method via adaptive analytical line selection and relevance vector machine regression model , 2015 .

[17]  Y. Markushin,et al.  Sample treatment and preparation for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy , 2016 .

[18]  A. Bogaerts,et al.  Laser ablation for analytical sampling: what can we learn from modeling? , 2003 .

[19]  Lothar M. Schmitt,et al.  Theory of genetic algorithms , 2001, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[20]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory , 2016, NeuroImage.

[21]  Y. Duan,et al.  Quantitative analysis of steel samples by laser-induced-breakdown spectroscopy with wavelet-packet-based relevance vector machines , 2018 .

[22]  N. Bridges,et al.  The ChemCam Instrument Suite on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover: Body Unit and Combined System Tests , 2012 .

[23]  V. Palleschi,et al.  Plasma processes and emission spectra in laser induced plasmas: A point of view , 2014 .

[24]  J. Hermann,et al.  Laser-induced plasma emission: from atomic to molecular spectra , 2017 .

[25]  V. Motto-Ros,et al.  L’imagerie élémentaire par spectroscopie LIBS , 2019, médecine/sciences.

[26]  Steven L. Brunton,et al.  Sparse Principal Component Analysis via Variable Projection , 2018, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[27]  Nathan Halko,et al.  Finding Structure with Randomness: Probabilistic Algorithms for Constructing Approximate Matrix Decompositions , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[28]  C. Fabre Advances in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy analysis for geology: A critical review , 2020 .

[29]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Some new indexes of cluster validity , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[30]  S. Clegg,et al.  Comparison of partial least squares and lasso regression techniques as applied to laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of geological samples , 2012 .

[31]  S. Legnaioli,et al.  Applications of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy in cultural heritage and archaeology: a critical review , 2019, Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry.

[32]  S. Mahadevan,et al.  A study of machine learning regression methods for major elemental analysis of rocks using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy , 2015 .

[33]  Lionel Canioni,et al.  Good practices in LIBS analysis: Review and advices , 2014 .

[34]  Gabriele Cristoforetti,et al.  Modi: a new mobile instrument for in situ standardless LIBS analysis of cultural heritage , 2005, SPIE Optical Metrology.

[35]  David W. Hahn,et al.  Sampling statistics and considerations for single-shot analysis using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy , 2002 .

[36]  Alessandro Ulrici,et al.  Practical comparison of sparse methods for classification of Arabica and Robusta coffee species using near infrared hyperspectral imaging , 2015 .

[37]  Darrell Whitley,et al.  A genetic algorithm tutorial , 1994, Statistics and Computing.

[38]  G. Golub,et al.  Separable nonlinear least squares: the variable projection method and its applications , 2003 .

[39]  Yongfeng Lu,et al.  Accuracy improvement of iron ore analysis using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with a hybrid sparse partial least squares and least-squares support vector machine model , 2018 .

[40]  U. Panne,et al.  Radiative models of laser-induced plasma and pump-probe diagnostics relevant to laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy , 2010 .

[41]  Arthur E. Hoerl,et al.  Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems , 2000, Technometrics.

[42]  D. Apelian,et al.  Applications of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) in Molten Metal Processing , 2017, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B.

[43]  Robert L. Tokar,et al.  Pre-flight calibration and initial data processing for the ChemCam laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy instrument on the Mars Science Laboratory rover , 2013 .

[44]  I. Jolliffe,et al.  A Modified Principal Component Technique Based on the LASSO , 2003 .

[45]  Tianlong Zhang,et al.  Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy in archeological science: a review of its application and future perspectives , 2019, Applied Spectroscopy Reviews.

[46]  Sunduz Keles,et al.  Sparse Partial Least Squares Classification for High Dimensional Data , 2010, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[47]  Steven L. Brunton,et al.  Randomized Matrix Decompositions using R , 2016, Journal of Statistical Software.

[48]  Richard R. Hark,et al.  Applications of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for geochemical and environmental analysis: A comprehensive review , 2013 .

[49]  Cancan Yi,et al.  Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy for quantitative analysis based on low-rank matrix approximations , 2017 .

[50]  Pavel Pořízka,et al.  Impact of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy data normalization on multivariate classification accuracy , 2017 .

[51]  A. Stăncălie,et al.  Investigation of the effect of laser parameters on the target, plume and plasma behavior during and after laser-solid interaction , 2017 .

[52]  Pavel Pořízka,et al.  On the utilization of principal component analysis in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy data analysis, a review , 2018, Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy.

[53]  Alan D. Chave,et al.  Analysis of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy spectra: The case for extreme value statistics , 2007 .

[54]  H. Lohninger,et al.  Methodology and applications of elemental mapping by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. , 2021, Analytica chimica acta.

[55]  S. Mahadevan,et al.  Manifold preprocessing for laser‐induced breakdown spectroscopy under Mars conditions , 2015 .

[56]  S. Clegg,et al.  Improved Intact Soil-Core Carbon Determination Applying Regression Shrinkage and Variable Selection Techniques to Complete Spectrum Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) , 2013, Applied spectroscopy.

[57]  Pavel Yaroshchyk,et al.  Automatic correction of continuum background in Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy using a model-free algorithm , 2014 .