Design and validation of a MR-compatible pneumatic manipulandum

The combination of functional MR imaging and novel robotic tools may provide unique opportunities to probe the neural systems underlying motor control and learning. Here, we describe the design and validation of a MR-compatible, 1 degree-of-freedom pneumatic manipulandum along with experiments demonstrating its safety and efficacy. We first validated the robot's ability to apply computer-controlled loads about the wrist, demonstrating that it possesses sufficient bandwidth to simulate torsional spring-like loads during point-to-point flexion movements. Next, we verified the MR-compatibility of the device by imaging a head phantom during robot operation. We observed no systematic differences in two measures of MRI signal quality (signal/noise and field homogeneity) when the robot was introduced into the scanner environment. Likewise, measurements of joint angle and actuator pressure were not adversely affected by scanning. Finally, we verified device efficacy by scanning 20 healthy human subjects performing rapid wrist flexions against a wide range of spring-like loads. We observed a linear relationship between joint torque at peak movement extent and perturbation magnitude, thus demonstrating the robot's ability to simulate spring-like loads in situ. fMRI revealed task-related activation in regions known to contribute to the control of movement including the left primary sensorimotor cortex and right cerebellum.

[1]  William M. Wells,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[2]  M. Kawato,et al.  Internal forward models in the cerebellum: fMRI study on grip force and load force coupling. , 2003, Progress in brain research.

[3]  C. Mavroidis,et al.  MR compatible ERF driven hand rehabilitation device , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[4]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  Application of Information Technology: An Integrated Software Suite for Surface-based Analyses of Cerebral Cortex , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  A P Georgopoulos,et al.  On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  R. D Seidler,et al.  Feedforward and feedback processes in motor control , 2004, NeuroImage.

[8]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[9]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  R. Riener,et al.  fMRI-Compatible Electromagnetic Haptic Interface , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[11]  W. T. Thach Correlation of neural discharge with pattern and force of muscular activity, joint position, and direction of intended next movement in motor cortex and cerebellum. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  J. G. Ziegler,et al.  Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers , 1942, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[13]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[14]  P A Gowland,et al.  Cerebral activation during a simple force production task: changes in the time course of the haemodynamic response , 2001, Neuroreport.

[15]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  MR Compatibility of Mechatronic Devices: Design Criteria , 1999, MICCAI.

[16]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  Dynamics and control of an MRI compatible master-slave system with hydrostatic transmission , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[18]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[19]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[20]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Learning to move amid uncertainty. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Yasmin L. Hashambhoy,et al.  Neural Correlates of Reach Errors , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Vaillancourt,et al.  Neural Basis for the Processes That Underlie Visually-guided and Internally-guided Force Control in Humans , 2003 .

[23]  T. Milner Adaptation to destabilizing dynamics by means of muscle cocontraction , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Detecting and adjusting for artifacts in fMRI time series data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[25]  Hiroshi Imamizu,et al.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool , 2000, Nature.

[26]  E. Evarts,et al.  Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Y. Perriard,et al.  fMRI compatible haptic interface actuated with traveling wave ultrasonic motor , 2005, Fourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005..

[28]  Computer-Assisted Intervention,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI’99 , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[29]  R. Gassert,et al.  MRI/fMRI-compatible robotic system with force feedback for interaction with human motion , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[30]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  MR compatible force sensing system for real-time monitoring of wrist moments during fMRI testing , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum , 2000 .

[32]  Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.  A High Performance Pneumatic Force Actuator System: Part I—Nonlinear Mathematical Model , 2000 .

[33]  Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.  A High Performance Pneumatic Force Actuator System: Part II—Nonlinear Controller Design , 2000 .