Understanding the survival of Zika virus in a vector interconnected sexual contact network

The recent outbreaks of the insect-vectored Zika virus have demonstrated its potential to be sexually transmitted, which complicates modeling and our understanding of disease dynamics. Autochthonous outbreaks in the US mainland may be a consequence of both modes of transmission, which affect the outbreak size, duration, and virus persistence. We propose a novel individual-based interconnected network model that incorporates both insect-vectored and sexual transmission of this pathogen. This model interconnects a homogeneous mosquito vector population with a heterogeneous human host contact network. The model incorporates the seasonal variation of mosquito abundance and characterizes host dynamics based on age group and gender in order to produce realistic projections. We use a sexual contact network which is generated on the basis of real world sexual behavior data. Our findings suggest that for a high relative transmissibility of asymptomatic hosts, Zika virus shows a high probability of sustaining in the human population for up to 3 months without the presence of mosquito vectors. Zika outbreaks are strongly affected by the large proportion of asymptomatic individuals and their relative transmissibility. The outbreak size is also affected by the time of the year when the pathogen is introduced. Although sexual transmission has a relatively low contribution in determining the epidemic size, it plays a role in sustaining the epidemic and creating potential endemic scenarios.

[1]  Marko Kolenc,et al.  Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Olga Wilhelmi,et al.  On the Seasonal Occurrence and Abundance of the Zika Virus Vector Mosquito Aedes Aegypti in the Contiguous United States , 2016, PLoS currents.

[3]  Sebastian Funk,et al.  Transmission Dynamics of Zika Virus in Island Populations: A Modelling Analysis of the 2013–14 French Polynesia Outbreak , 2016, bioRxiv.

[4]  G. Lothian,et al.  Spectral Analysis , 1971, Nature.

[5]  L. Meyers,et al.  Assessing real-time Zika risk in the United States , 2016, bioRxiv.

[6]  Y. A. Terefe,et al.  Mathematics of a model for Zika transmission dynamics , 2018, Theory in Biosciences.

[7]  Ondrej Maxian,et al.  Zika virus dynamics: When does sexual transmission matter? , 2017, Epidemics.

[8]  B. Hubert,et al.  Late sexual transmission of Zika virus related to persistence in the semen , 2016, The Lancet.

[9]  Joanne Turner,et al.  Global risk model for vector-borne transmission of Zika virus reveals the role of El Niño 2015 , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Faryad Darabi Sahneh,et al.  GEMFsim: A stochastic simulator for the generalized epidemic modeling framework , 2016, J. Comput. Sci..

[11]  Sourav Kumar Sasmal,et al.  Modeling the Spread of Zika Virus in a Stage-Structured Population: Effect of Sexual Transmission , 2018, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[12]  Jessen T. Havill,et al.  Networks , 1995, Discovering Computer Science.

[13]  S. Cauchemez,et al.  Reassessing Serosurvey-Based Estimates of the Symptomatic Proportion of Zika Virus Infections , 2018, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[15]  Vijay Kumar Chattu,et al.  The Emergence of Zika Virus as a Global Health Security Threat: A Review and a Consensus Statement of the INDUSEM Joint working Group (JWG) , 2016, Journal of global infectious diseases.

[16]  L. Amaral,et al.  The web of human sexual contacts , 2001, Nature.

[17]  A. Gumel,et al.  Sex-biased prevalence in infections with heterosexual, direct, and vector-mediated transmission: A theoretical analysis. , 2017, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[18]  Ted Cohen,et al.  The dynamics of sexual contact networks: effects on disease spread and control. , 2012, Theoretical population biology.

[19]  S. Merler,et al.  First outbreak of Zika virus in the continental United States: a modelling analysis , 2017, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[20]  Gerardo Chowell,et al.  Asymptomatic Transmission and the Dynamics of Zika Infection , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Raúl Toral,et al.  Simulating non-Markovian stochastic processes. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Farhad Nili,et al.  Theoretical Analysis , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[23]  L. P. Lounibos,et al.  Spatial and temporal patterns of abundance of Aedes aegypti L. (Stegomyia aegypti) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) [Stegomyia albopictus (Skuse)] in southern Florida , 2013, Medical and veterinary entomology.

[24]  D. Musso,et al.  Potential Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus , 2015, Emerging infectious diseases.

[25]  Faryad Darabi Sahneh,et al.  Effect of coupling on the epidemic threshold in interconnected complex networks: A spectral analysis , 2012, 2013 American Control Conference.

[26]  C. M. Saad-Roy,et al.  The effect of sexual transmission on Zika virus dynamics , 2018, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[27]  M. Keeling,et al.  Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals , 2007 .

[28]  W. Fagan,et al.  Mathematical model of Zika virus with vertical transmission , 2017, Infectious Disease Modelling.

[29]  Gerardo Chowell,et al.  Prevention and Control of Zika as a Mosquito-Borne and Sexually Transmitted Disease: A Mathematical Modeling Analysis , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Sharon Bewick,et al.  Mathematical model for Zika virus dynamics with sexual transmission route , 2017 .

[31]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  A Gillespie Algorithm for Non-Markovian Stochastic Processes , 2016, SIAM Rev..

[32]  C. Kribs,et al.  Effects of multiple transmission pathways on Zika dynamics , 2018, Infectious Disease Modelling.

[33]  Eric D'Ortenzio,et al.  Evidence of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  Michael G. Rossmann,et al.  The 3.8 angstrom resolution cryo-EM structure of Zika virus. , 2016 .

[35]  T. Pierson,et al.  The 3.8 Å resolution cryo-EM structure of Zika virus , 2016, Science.

[36]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Spread of Zika virus in the Americas , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  B. Althouse,et al.  The risk of sustained sexual transmission of Zika is underestimated , 2017, bioRxiv.

[38]  Daniel Janies,et al.  Zika Virus: Medical Countermeasure Development Challenges , 2016, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.