Image feature analysis for classification of microcalcifications in digital mammography: neural networks and genetic algorithms

We have developed an image feature-based algorithm to classify microcalcifications associated with benign and malignant processes in digital mammograms for the diagnosis of breast cancer. The feature-based algorithm is an alternative approach to image based method for classification of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Microcalcifications can be characterized by a number of quantitative variables describing the underling key features of a suspicious region such as the size, shape, and number of microcalcifications in a cluster. These features are calculated by an automated extraction scheme for each of the selected regions. The features are then used as input to a backpropagation neural network to make a decision regarding the probability of malignancy of a selected region. The initial selection of image features set is a rough estimation that may include redundant and non-discriminant features. A genetic algorithm is employed to select an optimal image feature set from the initial feature set and select an optimized structure of the neural network for the optimal input features. The performance of neural network is compared with that of radiologists in classifying the clusters of microcalcifications. Two set of mammogram cases are used in this study. The first set is from the digital mammography database from the Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS). The second set is from cases collected at Georgetown University Medical Center (GUMC). The diagnostic truth of the cases have been verified by biopsy. The performance of the neural network system is evaluated by ROC analysis. The system of neural network and genetic algorithms improves performance of our previous TRBF neural network. The neural network system was able to classify benign and malignant microcalcifications at a level favorably compared to experienced radiologists. The use of the neural network system can be used to help radiologists reducing the number biopsies in clinical applications. Genetic algorithms are an effective tool to select optimal input features and structure of a backpropagation neural network. The neural network, combined with genetic algorithms, is able to effectively classify benign and malignant microcalcifications. The results of the neural network system can be used to help reducing the number of benign biopsies.

[1]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[2]  J. Connolly,et al.  Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1989, Radiology.

[3]  Matthew T. Freedman,et al.  Classification of microcalcifications in digital mammograms for the diagnosis of breast cancer , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[4]  E A Sickles,et al.  Mammographic detectability of breast microcalcifications. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  W A Murphy,et al.  Isolated clustered microcalcifications in the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1978, Radiology.

[6]  F. Hall,et al.  Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. , 1988, Radiology.

[7]  D. Sanders Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Breast Calcifications , 1988 .

[8]  J W BLACK,et al.  A RADIOLOGICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE INCIDENCE OF CALCIFICATION IN DISEASES OF THE BREAST AND NEOPLASMS OF OTHER TISSUES. , 1965, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  B. Fisher,et al.  The pathology of invasive breast cancer A Syllabus Derived from Findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (Protocol No. 4) , 1975, Cancer.

[10]  R. Egan,et al.  Intramammary calcifications without an associated mass in benign and malignant diseases. , 1980, Radiology.

[11]  I S Simor,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a preliminary report from five centers. , 1986, Radiology.

[12]  A. G. Cooper,et al.  Milk of calcium in breast microcysts: manifestation as a solitary focal disease. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Mammography 1982: A statement of the american cancer society , 1982, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[14]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Mammography guidelines 1983: Background statement and update of cancer‐related checkup guidelines for breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women age 40 to 49 , 1983, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[16]  I Andersson What can we learn from interval carcinomas? , 1984, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[17]  M Moskowitz,et al.  Occult breast cancer: prevalence and radiographic detectability. , 1987, Radiology.

[18]  L. Baker,et al.  Breast cancer detection demonstration project: Five‐year summary report , 1982, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[19]  S. Feig,et al.  Decreased breast cancer mortality through mammographic screening: results of clinical trials. , 1988, Radiology.

[20]  M. Vazquez,et al.  The risk of carcinoma in wire localization biopsies for mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. , 1991, Surgery.

[21]  A. Stacey,et al.  The detection and significance of calcifications in the breast: a radiological and pathological study. , 1976, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  S. Grossberg Neural Networks and Natural Intelligence , 1988 .

[23]  M. Moskowitz,et al.  Breast cancer missed by mammography. , 1979, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  James A. Anderson,et al.  Neurocomputing: Foundations of Research , 1988 .

[25]  L. Bassett,et al.  Breast Cancer Detection: Mammography and Other Methods in Breast Imaging , 1987 .