Consideration of Native Coronary Disease Progression in the Decision to Perform Hybrid Coronary Revascularization
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Bell,et al. Multiple arterial grafts improve survival with coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting compared with percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2016, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[2] D. Hoffman,et al. CABG Versus PCI: Greater Benefit in Long-Term Outcomes With Multiple Arterial Bypass Grafting. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[3] L. Räber,et al. The association between in-stent neoatherosclerosis and native coronary artery disease progression: a long-term angiographic and optical coherence tomography cohort study. , 2015, European heart journal.
[4] Braunwald,et al. Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.
[5] M. Zembala,et al. Hybrid revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[6] B. Buxton,et al. Total arterial revascularization with internal thoracic and radial artery grafts in triple-vessel coronary artery disease is associated with improved survival. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[7] T. Vassiliades,et al. Clinical outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus. , 2014, American heart journal.
[8] M. Mack,et al. Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Left Main Disease Treated With Either Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Trial , 2014, Circulation.
[9] Sunil V. Rao,et al. Clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of 1,190 patients. , 2014, American heart journal.
[10] M. Mack,et al. Short-term and long-term clinical impact of stent thrombosis and graft occlusion in the SYNTAX trial at 5 years: Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery trial. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[11] M. Ruel,et al. Correlates of Saphenous Vein Graft Hyperplasia and Occlusion 1 Year After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Analysis From the CASCADE Randomized Trial , 2013, Circulation.
[12] G. Dangas,et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.
[13] T. Vassiliades,et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with significantly improved long-term survival, even among diabetic patients. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[14] D. Hoffman,et al. Arterial grafts protect the native coronary vessels from atherosclerotic disease progression. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[15] A. Laupacis,et al. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[16] David X M Zhao,et al. Do Hybrid Procedures Have Proven Clinical Utility and Are They the Wave of the Future?: Hybrid Procedures Have No Proven Clinical Utility and Are Not the Wave of the Future , 2012, Circulation.
[17] O. Alfieri,et al. Hybrid Procedures Have Proven Clinical Utility and Are the Wave of the Future , 2012, Circulation.
[18] M. Pfisterer,et al. Coronary artery disease progression late after successful stent implantation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[19] W. Hueb,et al. Five-year follow-up of angiographic disease progression after medicine, angioplasty, or surgery , 2010, Journal of cardiothoracic surgery.
[20] P. Kurlansky,et al. Thirty-year follow-up defines survival benefit for second internal mammary artery in propensity-matched groups. , 2010, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[21] Saif Usman,et al. Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Dual-Center Experience in 450 Consecutive Patients , 2009, Circulation.
[22] R. Wynne,et al. Long-term patency of 1108 radial arterial-coronary angiograms over 10 years. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[23] Y. Chatzizisis,et al. Is left coronary system more susceptible to atherosclerosis than right? A pathophysiological insight. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.
[24] A. Kiss,et al. Impact of Patient and Target-Vessel Characteristics on Arterial and Venous Bypass Graft Patency: Insight From a Randomized Trial , 2007, Circulation.
[25] W. Laskey,et al. Clinical Progression of Incidental, Asymptomatic Lesions Discovered During Culprit Vessel Coronary Intervention , 2005, Circulation.
[26] F. Loop,et al. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[27] D. Baim,et al. Beyond Restenosis: Five-Year Clinical Outcomes From Second-Generation Coronary Stent Trials , 2004, Circulation.
[28] M. Bourassa,et al. Native coronary disease progression exceeds failed revascularization as cause of angina after five years in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[29] P. Théroux,et al. Angiographic features of vein grafts versus ungrafted coronary arteries in patients with unstable angina and previous bypass surgery. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[30] E. Alderman. Angiographic correlates of graft patency and relationship to clinical outcomes. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[31] C. Hamm,et al. Angiographic follow-up results of a randomized study on angioplasty versus bypass surgery (GABI trial). GABI Study Group. , 1996, European heart journal.
[32] D. Faxon,et al. Five-year angiographic follow-up of factors associated with progression of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). CASS Participating Investigators and Staff. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[33] T. Craven,et al. Prognostic Significance of Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis , 1993, Circulation.
[34] J. Deckers,et al. Anatomical Progression of Coronary Artery Disease in Humans as Seen by Prospective, Repeated, Quantitated Coronary Angiography: Relation to Clinical Events and Risk Factors , 1992, Circulation.
[35] M. Hwang,et al. Progression of native coronary artery disease at 10 years: insights from a randomized study of medical versus surgical therapy for angina. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[36] R. Singh. Progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Clues to pathogenesis from serial coronary arteriography. , 1984, British heart journal.
[37] R. W. Brower,et al. Long term follow-up after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Progression and regression of disease in native coronary circulation and bypass grafts. , 1983, British heart journal.
[38] B. Buxton,et al. Should all moderate coronary lesions be grafted during primary coronary bypass surgery? An analysis of progression of native vessel disease during a randomized trial of conduits. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[39] Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al. ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2011 .
[40] B. Buxton,et al. Patencies of 2127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[41] B. Buxton,et al. Patencies of 2,127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years , 2004 .