Noninvasive identification of atrial fibrillation drivers: Simulation and patient data evaluation

Identification of atrial drivers as singularity points by using the inverse problem of electrocardiography is being used to guide atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the ability of the inverse problem to reconstruct fibrillation patterns and identify AF drivers has not been validated. Position of AF drivers was compared between recorded and inverse computed EGMs by making use of (1) realistic mathematical models and (2) simultaneous endocardial and body surface recordings during AF ablation procedures. Atrial drivers were defined as the areas with the highest dominant frequencies (HDF) or at the sites with a higher incidence of long-lasting phase singularities (PS). On simulation data, HDF analysis allowed the identification of the chamber that harboured the AF source in 30 out of 30 of the models evaluated vs. 26 out of 30 models for PS analysis. On patient data, solution of the inverse problem only allowed identifying atrial drivers on the correct atrial chamber by HDF analysis (2 out of 2 patients vs. 0 out of 2 patients for PS analysis). Identification of atrial sources by solving the inverse problem of the electrocardiography is more reliably accomplished based HDF than on PS detection.

[1]  Omer Berenfeld,et al.  Rotor meandering contributes to irregularity in electrograms during atrial fibrillation. , 2008, Heart rhythm.

[2]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources: CONFIRM (Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation) trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  T. Chao,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Catheter Ablation in Patients With Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results of 3-Year Follow-Up , 2012, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[4]  José Millet-Roig,et al.  Adaptive step ODE algorithms for the 3D simulation of electric heart activity with graphics processing units , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[5]  J. Millet,et al.  Noninvasive Localization of Maximal Frequency Sites of Atrial Fibrillation by Body Surface Potential Mapping , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[6]  Ashok J. Shah,et al.  Driver Domains in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation , 2014, Circulation.

[7]  Gunnar Seemann,et al.  In Silico Screening of the Key Cellular Remodeling Targets in Chronic Atrial Fibrillation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  D. Lin,et al.  Long-Term Outcome After Successful Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[9]  Elia Biganzoli,et al.  Updated Worldwide Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety of Catheter Ablation for Human Atrial Fibrillation , 2005, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[10]  J. Millet,et al.  Noninvasive Estimation of Epicardial Dominant High‐Frequency Regions During Atrial Fibrillation , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[11]  Omer Berenfeld,et al.  Body surface localization of left and right atrial high-frequency rotors in atrial fibrillation patients: a clinical-computational study. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[12]  Javier Moreno,et al.  Activation of Inward Rectifier Potassium Channels Accelerates Atrial Fibrillation in Humans: Evidence for a Reentrant Mechanism , 2006, Circulation.

[13]  Mathias Wilhelms,et al.  Computational modeling of the human atrial anatomy and electrophysiology , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.