Colloidal fouling in forward osmosis: Role of reverse salt diffusion

a b s t r a c t Colloidal fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) was investigated, focusing on the role of reverse salt diffusion. Two suspensions of silica nanoparticles, with average particle diameters of 24 and 139 nm, were used as model colloidal foulants. To verify the effect of reverse salt diffusion on the colloidal fouling behavior, NaCl and LaCl3 were employed as draw solutions because they exhibit different reverse diffusion rates. Our results suggest that in colloidal fouling of FO, salts diffuse from the draw to the feed solution and accumulate within the colloidal fouling layer that forms on the membrane surface. The accumulated salts result in a marked acceleration of cake-enhanced osmotic pressure (CEOP), which reduces the net osmotic driving force for permeate water flux. Fouling was not observed with the small, 24-nm particles because of the lack of substantial cake formation, but was notable for the 139-nm particles and for a feed containing a mixture of the 24 and 139 nm particles. Our findings further indicate that colloidal fouling is enhanced under solution conditions (ionic strength and pH) within the colloidal cake layer that promote aggregation or destabilization of the silica particles. Colloidal fouling reversibility was also examined by varying the cross-flow velocity during the FO fouling runs. We showed that in the absence of colloidal particle destabilization/aggregation, the permeate flux during colloidal fouling in FO recovered almost completely when the cross-flow velocity was increased from 8.5 to 25.6 cm/s. Our results suggest that reverse salt diffusion in FO is a key mechanism that controls colloidal fouling behavior as well as fouling reversibility. Therefore, minimization of reverse salt diffusion through the selection of proper draw solutes and optimization of FO membrane selectivity are important for minimizing colloidal fouling as well as enhancing FO operation efficiency.

[1]  J. Georgiadis,et al.  Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades , 2008, Nature.

[2]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes by Aluminum Oxide Colloids , 1995 .

[4]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO) , 2010 .

[5]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes : Implications for wastewater reclamation , 2007 .

[6]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Concentration of brine by forward osmosis: Performance and influence of membrane structure , 2008 .

[8]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Relating organic fouling of reverse osmosis membranes to intermolecular adhesion forces. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Combined influence of natural organic matter (NOM) and colloidal particles on nanofiltration membrane fouling , 2005 .

[10]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[11]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[12]  F. Amrani,et al.  Purification of aqueous solutions of metal ions by ultrafiltration , 2007 .

[13]  Dezhong Xiao,et al.  The role of physical and chemical parameters on forward osmosis membrane fouling during algae separa , 2011 .

[14]  Mark D. Williams,et al.  Membrane bioreactor process for removing biodegradable organic matter from water. , 2007, Water research.

[15]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents , 2010 .

[16]  H. Kamiya,et al.  Influence of Particle Diameter on Surface Silanol Structure, Hydration Forces, and Aggregation Behavior of Alkoxide‐Derived Silica Particles , 2004 .

[17]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[18]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[19]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Gypsum scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis: measurements and mechanisms. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Effect of Interparticle Electrostatic Double Layer Interactions on Permeate Flux Decline in Crossflow Membrane Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions: An Experimental Investigation. , 1998, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[21]  Arezou Jafari,et al.  Simulation of Fluid Flow Through a Granular Bed , 2006 .

[22]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Particle Deposition and Aggregation: Measurement, Modelling and Simulation , 1995 .

[23]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes , 2008 .

[24]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Drinking water from sea water by forward osmosis , 1976 .

[25]  E. Matijević,et al.  Stability of colloidal silica: I. Effect of simple electrolytes , 1969 .

[26]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[27]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Qian Yang,et al.  Dual-layer hollow fibers with enhanced flux as novel forward osmosis membranes for water production. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of Crossflow Membrane Filter Geometry and Shear Rate on Colloidal Fouling in Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Separations , 2002 .

[30]  Richard J. Wakeman,et al.  Additional techniques to improve microfiltration , 2002 .

[31]  Gurdev Singh,et al.  Experimental correlations of pH and ionic strength effects on the colloidal fouling potential of silica nanoparticles in crossflow ultrafiltration , 2007 .

[32]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[33]  J. Israelachvili Intermolecular and surface forces , 1985 .

[34]  T. Luxbacher Electrokinetic characterization of flat sheet membranes by streaming current measurement , 2006 .

[35]  Ata M. Hassan,et al.  A demonstration plant based on the new NF-SWRO process , 2000 .

[36]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[37]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: Role of biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure , 2007 .

[38]  Raphael Semiat,et al.  Energy issues in desalination processes. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation , 2006 .

[40]  Gurdev Singh,et al.  Quantifying the effect of ionic strength on colloidal fouling potential in membrane filtration. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[41]  Shuang Liang,et al.  Two-step optimization of pressure and recovery of reverse osmosis desalination process. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  Combining MBR and NF/RO membrane filtration for the removal of trace organics in indirect potable wa , 2010 .