Interoperating Geographic Information Systems

The OpenGIS Consortium, OGC, has over one hundred and fifty members drawn from both the user and vendor communities and seeks to develop specifications for providing interoperability for geospatial data access and geoprocessing. This paper unashamedly adopts a biased perspective, that of a vendor active in the OGC. It attempts to explain the importance of the OGC in raising issues that go far beyond the writing of specifications. Unlike many of the papers included here, the subject of this paper does not readily submit to a rigorous academic analysis. Issues are argued by example rather than by proof. To many vendors, the worth of the OGC lies in its recognition of key commercial realities. Since the OGC does concern itself with implementation and because it is trying to use the best of emerging technologies but is not tied to one particular platform, it faces many of the same problems that a vendor encounters. It is familiar with the compromise and pragmatism required to make progress. Consequently it provides one of the few forums where these issues are discussed. This paper gives time to underlying issues that, although raised in the commercial world, impinge directly on technical developments. Many of these issues remain current and deserve a wider audience. They represent tales of the OpenGIS process, both past and present, told by a vendor located in a small market town.

[1]  Vipul Kashyap,et al.  Domain Specific Ontologies for Semantic Information Brokering on the Global Information Infrastructure , 1998 .

[2]  Julian L. Simon,et al.  Basic research methods in social science , 1985 .

[3]  James E. Rumbaugh,et al.  OMT: The Object Model , 1995, J. Object Oriented Program..

[4]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations , 1973 .

[5]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[6]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  On Automatic Reasoning for Schema Integration , 1993, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[7]  Vipul Kashyap,et al.  So Far (Schematically) yet So Near (Semantically) , 1992, DS-5.

[8]  George A. Miller,et al.  Nouns in WordNet: A Lexical Inheritance System , 1990 .

[9]  Susan Darling Urban,et al.  Resolving semantic heterogeneity through the explicit representation of data model semantics , 1991, SGMD.

[10]  Martin J. Dürst,et al.  The design and analysis of spatial data structures. Applications of spatial data structures: computer graphics, image processing, and GIS , 1991 .

[11]  Stephen C. Guptill,et al.  An enhanced digital line graph design , 1990 .

[12]  Arnon Rosenthal,et al.  A Metadata Resource to Promote Data Integration , 1999 .

[13]  Robert Meersman,et al.  Introduction: An Essay on the Role and Evolution of Data(base) Semantics , 1997 .

[14]  G. Miller,et al.  Contextual correlates of semantic similarity , 1991 .

[15]  Fèlix Saltor,et al.  Overcoming Schematic Discrepancies in Interoperable Databases , 1992, DS-5.

[16]  Monika Sester,et al.  Linking Objects of Different Spatial Data Sets by Integration and Aggregation , 1998, GeoInformatica.

[17]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .

[18]  Heinz Schweppe,et al.  Abstraction and Decomposition in Interoperable GIS , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Stefano Spaccapietra,et al.  Conflicts and correspondence assertions in interoperable databases , 1991, SGMD.

[20]  John Murphy,et al.  Using WordNet as a Knowledge Base for Measuring Semantic Similarity between Words , 1994 .

[21]  Roy Rada,et al.  Development and application of a metric on semantic nets , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[22]  Hanan Samet,et al.  Ranking in Spatial Databases , 1995, SSD.

[23]  Uma Srinivasan A Framework for Conceptual Integration of Heterogeneous Databases , 1997 .

[24]  Douglas Comer,et al.  Ubiquitous B-Tree , 1979, CSUR.

[25]  Hanan Samet,et al.  A consistent hierarchical representation for vector data , 1986, SIGGRAPH.

[26]  Walid G. Aref,et al.  Extending a DBMS with Spatial Operations , 1991, SSD.

[27]  Jim Woodcock,et al.  Software engineering mathematics , 1988 .

[28]  Kristin Stock,et al.  THE REPRESENTATION OF GEOGRAPHIC OBJECT SEMANTICS USING INCLUSION RULES , 1998 .

[29]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Changing Focus on Interoperability in Information Systems:From System, Syntax, Structure to Semantics , 1999 .

[30]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Robert Weibel,et al.  Overcoming the Knowledge Acquisition Bottleneck in Map Generalization: The Role of Interactive Systems and Computational Intelligence , 1995, COSIT.