Measurement Duration but Not Distance, Angle, and Neighbour-Proximity Affects Precision in Enteric Methane Emissions when Using the Laser Methane Detector Technique in Lactating Dairy Cows

Simple Summary Methane that is breathed out and eructed from ruminants is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. Although metabolic chambers are the “gold standard” for measuring methane from livestock, their application in production farms is very limited. There is a need to develop proxy methods that can be applied in such production environments. The proprietary Laser Methane Detector (LMD) has been trialed for the previous decade and has demonstrated its usefulness as a non-invasive and portable instrument to determine methane output from ruminants. In validating the reliability and stability of the data generated by the LMD, the current study gives answers to some very practical assumptions used in the use of the LMD and enhances the confidence in its use in ruminants. Abstract The laser methane detector (LMD), is a proprietary hand-held open path laser measuring device. Its measurements are based on infrared absorption spectroscopy using a semiconductor laser as a collimated excitation source. In the current study, LMD measurements were carried out in two experiments using 20 and 71 lactating dairy cows in Spain and Scotland, respectively. The study aimed at testing four assumptions that may impact on the reliability and repeatability of the LMD measurements of ruminants. The study has verified that there is no difference in enteric methane measurements taken from a distance of 3 m than from those taken at a distance of 2 m; there was no effect to the measurements when the measurement angle was adjusted from 90° to 45°; that the presence of an adjacent animal had no effect on the methane measurements; and that measurements lasting up to 240 s are more precise than those taken for a shorter duration. The results indicate that angle, proximity to other animals, and distance had no effects and that measurements need to last a minimum of 240 s to maintain precision.

[1]  D. Sorg Measuring Livestock CH4 Emissions with the Laser Methane Detector: A Review , 2021, Methane.

[2]  David G. Voelz,et al.  Effects of temperature inversion in the lower atmosphere on dispersion and angle of arrival of highly directional beams , 2020 .

[3]  Hermann Swalve,et al.  Comparison of a laser methane detector with the GreenFeed and two breath analysers for on-farm measurements of methane emissions from dairy cows , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[4]  R. Roessler,et al.  Using a portable laser methane detector in goats to assess diurnal, diet- and position-dependent variations in enteric methane emissions , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[5]  P. Koerkamp,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of the breath methane concentration method to determine methane production of dairy cows. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  T. Yan,et al.  Towards a robust protocol for enteric methane measurements using a hand held Laser Methane Detector in Ruminents , 2017 .

[7]  J. Hyslop,et al.  Evaluation of the laser methane detector to estimate methane emissions from ewes and steers. , 2014, Journal of Animal Science.

[8]  T. Yan,et al.  Measurement of enteric methane from ruminants using a hand-held laser methane detector , 2013 .

[9]  Jing Ma,et al.  Effect of the outer scale on the angle of arrival variance for free-space-laser beam corrugated by non-Kolmogorov turbulence , 2009 .

[10]  D. J. Roberts,et al.  On the use of a laser methane detector in dairy cows , 2009 .

[11]  Vinod Yadava,et al.  Laser beam machining—A review , 2008 .

[12]  M. Miyaji A Portable Remote Methane Detector Using a Tunable Diode Laser , 2003 .

[13]  L. Andrews,et al.  Laser Beam Scintillation with Applications , 2001 .

[14]  S. Tenney Respiration in mammals , 1970 .

[15]  M. Kleiber,et al.  Bloat in Cattle and Composition of Rumen Gases , 1943 .