Current state of ethics literature synthesis: a systematic review of reviews

BackgroundModern standards for evidence-based decision making in clinical care and public health still rely solely on eminence-based input when it comes to normative ethical considerations. Manuals for clinical guideline development or health technology assessment (HTA) do not explain how to search, analyze, and synthesize relevant normative information in a systematic and transparent manner. In the scientific literature, however, systematic or semi-systematic reviews of ethics literature already exist, and scholarly debate on their opportunities and limitations has recently bloomed.MethodsA systematic review was performed of all existing systematic or semi-systematic reviews for normative ethics literature on medical topics. The study further assessed how these reviews report on their methods for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis of ethics literature.ResultsWe identified 84 reviews published between 1997 and 2015 in 65 different journals and demonstrated an increasing publication rate for this type of review. While most reviews reported on different aspects of search and selection methods, reporting was much less explicit for aspects of analysis and synthesis methods: 31 % did not fulfill any criteria related to the reporting of analysis methods; for example, only 25 % of the reviews reported the ethical approach needed to analyze and synthesize normative information.ConclusionsWhile reviews of ethics literature are increasingly published, their reporting quality for analysis and synthesis of normative information should be improved. Guiding questions are: What was the applied ethical approach and technical procedure for identifying and extracting the relevant normative information units? What method and procedure was employed for synthesizing normative information? Experts and stakeholders from bioethics, HTA, guideline development, health care professionals, and patient organizations should work together to further develop this area of evidence-based health care.

[1]  Simon du Plock.  Doing your Literature Review , 2014 .

[2]  T. Shibre,et al.  Ethical and professional challenges in mental health care in low- and middle-income countries , 2010, International review of psychiatry.

[3]  Catherine McGeehin Heilferty.  Ethical considerations in the study of online illness narratives: a qualitative review. , 2011, Journal of advanced nursing.

[4]  Judith Garrard,et al.  Health Sciences Literature Review Made Easy: The Matrix Method , 1999 .

[5]  W. Rogowski,et al.  What is personalized medicine: sharpening a vague term based on a systematic literature review , 2013, BMC Medical Ethics.

[6]  B. Osimani,et al.  Disability, Human Rights, and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Systematic Review , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[7]  J. Ives,et al.  A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies , 2015, BMC Medical Ethics.

[8]  K. Chung,et al.  A Systematic Review of Ethical Principles in the Plastic Surgery Literature , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[10]  J. Cassiman,et al.  Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers , 2006, Clinical genetics.

[11]  R. Whittemore,et al.  The integrative review: updated methodology. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[12]  Neiva Francenely Cunha Vieira,et al.  Ethical dilemmas experienced by nurses presented in nursing publications. , 2008, Revista latino-americana de enfermagem.

[13]  Jill K. Jesson,et al.  Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques , 2011 .

[14]  D. Strech,et al.  Inclusion of Ethical Issues in Dementia Guidelines: A Thematic Text Analysis , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[15]  J. Coverdale,et al.  Constructing a systematic review for argument-based clinical ethics literature: the example of concealed medications. , 2007, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[16]  Jesmin,et al.  Engaging researchers on developing , using and improving knowledge synthesis methods : Introduction to a series of articles describing the results of a scoping review on emerging knowledge synthesis methods , 2016 .

[17]  Michele Tarsilla.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[18]  Margrit Schreier,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice , 2012 .

[19]  B. Hofmann.  Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[20]  Daniel Strech,et al.  How to write a systematic review of reasons , 2011, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[21]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2013 .

[22]  J. V. van Delden,et al.  Reconsidering the ethics of sham interventions in an era of emerging technologies. , 2015, Surgery.

[23]  D. Brock.  Truth or Consequences: The Role of Philosophers in Policy-Making , 1987, Ethics.

[24]  J. Higgins.  Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[25]  Verina Wild,et al.  Systematically evaluating the impact of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) on health care delivery: a matrix of ethical implications. , 2014, Health policy.

[26]  Laura A. Levit,et al.  COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH , 2011 .

[27]  D. Strech,et al.  Systematic and transparent inclusion of ethical issues and recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: a six-step approach , 2014, Implementation Science.

[28]  S. Zwijsen,et al.  Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: An overview of the literature , 2011, Aging & mental health.

[29]  J. Vergnes,et al.  Ethics in systematic reviews , 2010, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[30]  D. Strech,et al.  The Need for Systematic Reviews of Reasons , 2011, Bioethics.

[31]  J. Coverdale,et al.  Argument-based medical ethics: a formal tool for critically appraising the normative medical ethics literature. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  R. McDougall.  Reviewing Literature in Bioethics Research: Increasing Rigour in Non‐Systematic Reviews , 2015, Bioethics.

[33]  F. Dobbels,et al.  Could minors be living kidney donors? A systematic review of guidelines, position papers and reports , 2013, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[34]  M. Kölch,et al.  Safeguarding children's rights in psychopharmacological research: ethical and legal issues. , 2010, Current pharmaceutical design.

[35]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[36]  D. Strech,et al.  Did we describe what you meant? Findings and methodological discussion of an empirical validation study for a systematic review of reasons , 2014, BMC Medical Ethics.

[37]  Philipp Mayring.  Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken , 2003 .

[38]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[39]  C. Gastmans,et al.  A Review and Taxonomy of Argument-Based Ethics Literature regarding Conscientious Objections to End-of-Life Procedures , 2010 .

[40]  A. Tricco,et al.  Introduction: Engaging researchers on developing, using, and improving knowledge synthesis methods: a series of articles describing the results of a scoping review on emerging knowledge synthesis methods. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[41]  J. Bornman,et al.  A systematic review of ethics knowledge in audiology (1980-2010). , 2014, American journal of audiology.

[42]  D. Brock.  Truth or consequences: the role of philosophers in policy-making. , 1987, Ethics.

[43]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Nursing ethical values and definitions: A literature review , 2013, Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research.

[44]  D. Chadwick,et al.  Implications of socio-cultural contexts for the ethics of clinical trials. , 1997, Health technology assessment.

[45]  S. Yoder.  The nature of ethical expertise. , 1998, The Hastings Center report.

[46]  L. Caplan,et al.  Ethics in the rheumatology literature: a systematic review. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[47]  E. Tacconelli.  Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .

[48]  Sarah Kate Bennett,et al.  Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care: A Practical Guide , 2012 .

[49]  R. McDougall,et al.  Overriding parents’ medical decisions for their children: a systematic review of normative literature , 2013, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[50]  D. Sulmasy,et al.  Methods in Medical Ethics , 2010 .

[51]  Laura A. Levit,et al.  Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews , 2011 .

[52]  Kris Dierickx,et al.  To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts , 2012, European Journal of Human Genetics.