Using individual-based movement models to assess inter-patch connectivity for large carnivores in fragmented landscapes
暂无分享,去创建一个
Thorsten Wiegand | Stephanie Kramer-Schadt | T. Wiegand | S. Goyal | S. Kramer‐Schadt | R. Kanagaraj | Rajapandian Kanagaraj | Surendra Prakash Goyal
[1] T. Wiegand,et al. The relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population genetic variation in the red‐cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) , 2010, Molecular ecology.
[2] N. Stenseth,et al. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology , 1993 .
[3] C. Carroll,et al. Spatial viability analysis of Amur tiger Panthera tigris altaica in the Russian Far East: the role of protected areas and landscape matrix in population persistence , 2006 .
[4] T. Wiegand,et al. Assessing habitat suitability for tiger in the fragmented Terai Arc Landscape of India and Nepal , 2011 .
[5] James L. D. Smith,et al. The contribution of variance in lifetime reproduction to effective population size in Tigers , 1991 .
[6] Thorsten Wiegand,et al. Individual movement behavior, matrix heterogeneity, and the dynamics of spatially structured populations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[7] Thorsten Wiegand,et al. Fragmented landscapes, road mortality and patch connectivity: modelling influences on the dispersal of Eurasian lynx , 2004 .
[8] S. Nandy,et al. Monitoring the Chilla–Motichur wildlife corridor using geospatial tools , 2007 .
[9] L. Fahrig. How much habitat is enough , 2001 .
[10] S. Saura,et al. Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation , 2006, Landscape Ecology.
[11] S. L. Lima,et al. SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS , 1999 .
[12] Sarah E. Gergel,et al. Testing assumptions of cost surface analysis—a tool for invasive species management , 2007, Landscape Ecology.
[13] Bruce T. Milne,et al. Detecting Critical Scales in Fragmented Landscapes , 1997 .
[14] Atte Moilanen,et al. SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY , 2002 .
[15] Justin M. Calabrese,et al. A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .
[16] A. N. M. Hossain,et al. Female tiger Panthera tigris home range size in the Bangladesh Sundarbans: the value of this mangrove ecosystem for the species’ conservation , 2011, Oryx.
[17] Volker Grimm,et al. Patterns for parameters in simulation models , 2007 .
[18] Timothy H. Keitt,et al. LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .
[19] M. Elgar,et al. The Use of Corridors by Mammals in Fragmented Australian Eucalypt Forests , 1997 .
[20] Daniel Simberloff,et al. The Contribution of Population and Community Biology to Conservation Science , 1988 .
[21] Jana Verboom,et al. Dispersal and habitat connectivity in complex heterogeneous landscapes: an analysis with a GIS based random walk model , 1996 .
[22] C. Carroll. Connectivity Conservation: Linking connectivity to viability: insights from spatially explicit population models of large carnivores , 2006 .
[23] B. Danielson,et al. Spatially Explicit Population Models: Current Forms and Future Uses , 1995 .
[24] Santiago Saura,et al. A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape , 2010 .
[25] E. Wikramanayake,et al. The Fate of Wild Tigers , 2007 .
[26] Miguel Delibes,et al. Effects of Matrix Heterogeneity on Animal Dispersal: From Individual Behavior to Metapopulation‐Level Parameters , 2004, The American Naturalist.
[27] T. Wiegand,et al. Individual-based movement models reveals sex-biased effects of landscape fragmentation on animal movement , 2012 .
[28] Stephanie Kramer-Schadt,et al. Between ecological theory and planning practice: (Re-) Connecting forest patches for the wildcat in Lower Saxony, Germany , 2012 .
[29] Paul C. Paquet,et al. Conservation Biology and Carnivore Conservation in the Rocky Mountains , 1996 .
[30] Lucas N Joppa,et al. Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions. , 2008, Ecology letters.
[31] Todd R. Lookingbill,et al. Combining a dispersal model with network theory to assess habitat connectivity. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.
[32] Eliot J. B. McIntire,et al. Evaluating functional connectivity with matrix behavior uncertainty for an endangered butterfly , 2013, Landscape Ecology.
[33] M. Sunquist,et al. Ecology behaviour and resilience of the tiger and its conservation needs , 1999 .
[34] Mark V. Lomolino,et al. CORRIDORS AND MAMMAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ACROSS A FRAGMENTED, OLD‐GROWTH FOREST LANDSCAPE , 2000 .
[35] James L. D. Smith,et al. Landscape Analysis of Tiger Distribution and Habitat Quality in Nepal , 1998 .
[36] Raman Sukumar,et al. The Asian Elephant: Ecology and Management , 1990 .
[37] P. Ferreras. Landscape structure and asymmetrical inter-patch connectivity in a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx , 2001 .
[38] Atte Moilanen,et al. On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology , 2001 .
[39] P. Nikolakaki,et al. A GIS site-selection process for habitat creation: estimating connectivity of habitat patches , 2004 .
[40] Hans Van Dyck,et al. Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal , 2007, Landscape Ecology.
[41] Andrew Fall,et al. Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: An application of graph theory , 2006 .
[42] L. Fahrig,et al. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity , 2000 .
[43] Heather Fry,et al. A user’s guide , 2003 .
[44] E. Revilla,et al. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[45] Eric J. Gustafson,et al. The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch Colonization , 1996 .
[46] I. Hanski. A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .
[47] Volker Grimm,et al. Using pattern-oriented modeling for revealing hidden information: a key for reconciling ecological theory and application , 2003 .
[48] Thorsten Wiegand,et al. Dealing with Uncertainty in Spatially Explicit Population Models , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.
[49] Séverine Vuilleumier,et al. Animal dispersal modelling: handling landscape features and related animal choices , 2006 .
[50] Stephanie Kramer-Schadt,et al. What you see is where you go? Modeling dispersal in mountainous landscapes , 2007, Landscape Ecology.
[51] A. Morzillo,et al. An integration of habitat evaluation, individual based modeling, and graph theory for a potential black bear population recovery in southeastern Texas, USA , 2010, Landscape Ecology.
[52] L. Fahrig,et al. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .
[53] Hugh P Possingham,et al. Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. , 2006, Ecology letters.
[54] Quantifying Landscape Connectivity: Key Patches And Key Corridors , 2003 .
[55] Sean C. Ahearn,et al. TIGMOD: an individual-based spatially explicit model for simulating tiger/human interaction in multiple use forests , 2001 .
[56] S. Goyal,et al. Conservation status of the Chila-Motichur corridor for elephant movement in Rajaji-Corbett national parks area, India , 1990 .
[57] J. Tracey. Connectivity Conservation: Individual-based modeling as a tool for conserving connectivity , 2006 .
[58] Larry B. Crowder,et al. An individual-based, spatially-explicit simulation model of the population dynamics of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker, Picoides borealis , 1998 .
[59] E. Revilla,et al. Lynx reintroductions in fragmented landscapes of Germany : Projects with a future or misunderstood wildlife conservation? , 2005 .
[60] Justin S. Brashares,et al. Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: do least‐cost models reflect how animals use landscapes? , 2011 .
[61] James L. D. Smith. The Role of Dispersal in Structuring the Chitwan Tiger Population , 1993 .
[62] Karin Frank,et al. Analyzing the effect of stepping stones on target patch colonisation in structured landscapes for Eurasian lynx , 2011, Landscape Ecology.
[63] Eric J. Gustafson,et al. Simulating dispersal of reintroduced species within heterogeneous landscapes , 2004 .
[64] Kevin R. Crooks,et al. Connectivity Conservation: Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature , 2006 .
[65] Karin Frank,et al. Breaking Functional Connectivity into Components: A Novel Approach Using an Individual-Based Model, and First Outcomes , 2011, PloS one.
[66] Erik Matthysen,et al. The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .
[67] Steven F. Railsback,et al. Individual-based modeling and ecology , 2005 .
[68] Jianguo Wu,et al. Population viability of the Siberian Tiger in a changing landscape: Going, going and gone? , 2011 .
[69] E. Wikramanayake,et al. Designing a Conservation Landscape for Tigers in Human‐Dominated Environments , 2004 .
[70] Thorsten Wiegand,et al. Expansion of Brown Bears (Ursus arctos) into the Eastern Alps: A Spatially Explicit Population Model , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.
[71] Thorsten Wiegand,et al. RULE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF SUITABLE HABITAT AND PATCH CONNECTIVITY FOR THE EURASIAN LYNX , 2002 .