Strength and uncertainty of phytoplankton metrics for assessing eutrophication impacts in lakes

Phytoplankton constitutes a diverse array of short-lived organisms which derive their nutrients from the water column of lakes. These features make this community the most direct and earliest indicator of the impacts of changing nutrient conditions on lake ecosystems. It also makes them particularly suitable for measuring the success of restoration measures following reductions in nutrient loads. This paper integrates a large volume of work on a number of measures, or metrics, developed for using phytoplankton to assess the ecological status of European lakes, as required for the Water Framework Directive. It assesses the indicator strength of these metrics, specifically in relation to representing the impacts of eutrophication. It also examines how these measures vary naturally at different locations within a lake, as well as between lakes, and how much variability is associated with different replicate samples, different months within a year and between years. On the basis of this analysis, three of the strongest metrics (chlorophyll-a, phytoplankton trophic index (PTI), and cyanobacterial biovolume) are recommended for use as robust measures for assessing the ecological quality of lakes in relation to nutrient-enrichment pressures and a minimum recommended sampling frequency is provided for these three metrics.

[1]  A phytoplankton trophic index to assess the status of lakes for the Water Framework Directive , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[2]  Anne Lyche Solheim,et al.  Quantifying uncertainties in biologically-based water quality assessment: a pan-European analysis of lake phytoplankton community metrics , 2013 .

[3]  S. McGowan,et al.  Ancient blue‐green blooms , 1999 .

[4]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton , 2002 .

[5]  Ute Mischke,et al.  Phytoplankton indicator taxa for reference conditions in Northern and Central European lowland lakes , 2012, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  L. Carvalho,et al.  Water colour, phosphorus and alkalinity are the major determinants of the dominant phytoplankton species in European lakes , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[7]  Astrid Schmidt-Kloiber,et al.  The WISER metadatabase: the key to more than 100 ecological datasets from European rivers, lakes and coastal waters , 2012, Hydrobiologia.

[8]  A. Solheim,et al.  Defining Chlorophyll-a Reference Conditions in European Lakes , 2010, Environmental management.

[9]  G. Morabito,et al.  Lago Maggiore oligotrophication as seen from the long-term evolution of its phytoplankton taxonomic size structure , 2009 .

[10]  C. Reynolds.  What factors influence the species composition of phytoplankton in lakes of different trophic status? , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[11]  WISER deliverable D3.1-4: guidance document on sampling, analysis and counting standards for phytoplankton in lakes , 2012 .

[12]  Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz,et al.  Assessment of european streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish : a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress , 2006 .

[13]  S. Larsen,et al.  Using chlorophyll a and cyanobacteria in the ecological classification of lakes , 2011 .

[14]  J. Karr,et al.  Restoring life in running waters : better biological monitoring , 1998 .

[15]  S. Szabó,et al.  Small-scale patchiness of the phytoplankton in a lentic oxbow , 2011 .

[16]  Erik Jeppesen,et al.  Water Framework Directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes , 2005 .

[17]  D. Hering,et al.  The WISER way of organising ecological data from European rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[18]  Jacob Carstensen,et al.  Summer algal blooms in shallow estuaries: Definition, mechanisms, and link to eutrophication , 2007 .

[19]  J. Padisák,et al.  Use of Phytoplankton Assemblages for Monitoring Ecological Status of Lakes within the Water Framework Directive: The Assemblage Index , 2005, Hydrobiologia.

[20]  R. Carlson.  A trophic state index for lakes1 , 1977 .

[21]  H. Bennion.  A diatom-phosphorus transfer function for shallow, eutrophic ponds in southeast England , 1994, Hydrobiologia.

[22]  M. Eismann.  Hyperspectral Remote Sensing , 2012 .

[23]  N. Salmaso,et al.  Morpho-Functional Groups and phytoplankton development in two deep lakes (Lake Garda, Italy and Lake Stechlin, Germany) , 2007, Hydrobiologia.

[24]  Other.  Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of The Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy (Water Framework Directive) , 2000 .

[25]  F. Kelly,et al.  Northern Lake Fish fauna ecological assessment methods: JRC Technical Reports, Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report , 2014 .

[26]  J. Lund.  Studies on Asterionella Formosa Hass: II. Nutrient Depletion and the Spring Maximum , 1950 .

[27]  Anne Courrat,et al.  Three hundred ways to assess Europe's surface waters: An almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive , 2012 .

[28]  S. Fisher,et al.  Global Climate Change and Freshwater Ecosystems , 2011 .

[29]  Daniela Stroppiana,et al.  Assessing remotely sensed chlorophyll-a for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in European perialpine lakes. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  E. Jeppesen,et al.  Top-down control in freshwater lakes: the role of nutrient state, submerged macrophytes and water depth , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[31]  L. Tranvik,et al.  Terrestrial carbon and intraspecific size-variation shape lake ecosystems. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  P. Sandra,et al.  Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report. Part 2: Lakes , 2009 .

[33]  G. Woodward,et al.  Climate change and freshwater ecosystems: impacts across multiple levels of organization , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  R. Margalef,et al.  Limnology now : a paradigm of planetary problems , 1995 .

[35]  Peter D. Hunter,et al.  Hyperspectral remote sensing of cyanobacterial pigments as indicators for cell populations and toxins in eutrophic lakes , 2010 .

[36]  Anne Lyche Solheim,et al.  Lake Ecological Assessment Systems and Intercalibration for the European Water Framework Directive: Aims, Achievements and Further Challenges , 2011 .

[37]  O. Pietiläinen,et al.  Chlorophyll–nutrient relationships of different lake types using a large European dataset , 2008, Aquatic Ecology.

[38]  G. Nygaard.  Quotient hypothesis and some new or little known phytoplankton organisms , 1949 .

[39]  Edward McCauley,et al.  Patterns in phytoplankton taxonomic composition across temperate lakes of differing nutrient status , 1997 .

[40]  O. Pietiläinen,et al.  Chlorophyll reference conditions for European lake types used for intercalibration of ecological status , 2008, Aquatic Ecology.

[41]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton , 1984 .

[42]  Laurence Carvalho,et al.  Cyanobacterial blooms: statistical models describing risk factors for national-scale lake assessment and lake management. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  M. Simona,et al.  Phytoplankton as an Indicator of the Water Quality of the Deep Lakes South of the Alps , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[44]  L. Zarauz,et al.  Testing the usefulness of a simple automatic method for particles abundance and size determination to derive cost-effective biological indicators in large monitoring networks , 2012, Hydrobiologia.

[45]  M. Dokulil,et al.  Cyanobacterial dominance in lakes , 2000, Hydrobiologia.

[46]  P. Nõges,et al.  Why do phytoplankton species composition and “traditional” water quality parameters indicate different ecological status of a large shallow lake? , 2011, Hydrobiologia.

[47]  CAS-No.  Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive and its , 2003 .

[48]  Antonio Dalmiglio,et al.  Reference conditions and WFD compliant class boundaries for phytoplankton biomass and chlorophyll-a in Alpine lakes , 2009, Hydrobiologia.