What Have We Learned from Highly Time-Resolved Measurements during EPA’s Supersites Program and Related Studies?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Solomon,et al. Secondary Particulate Matter in the United States: Insights from the Particulate Matter Supersites Program and Related Studies , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
[2] Judith C. Chow,et al. Source Apportionment: Findings from the U.S. Supersites Program , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
[3] Constantinos Sioutas,et al. Continuous and Semicontinuous Monitoring Techniques for Particulate Matter Mass and Chemical Components: A Synthesis of Findings from EPA’s Particulate Matter Supersites Program and Related Studies , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
[4] P. T. Roberts,et al. Wintertime Vertical Variations in Particulate Matter (PM) and Precursor Concentrations in the San Joaquin Valley during the California Regional Coarse PM/Fine PM Air Quality Study , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
[5] A. Robinson,et al. Application of the Pseudo-Deterministic Receptor Model to Resolve Power Plant Influences on Air Quality in Pittsburgh , 2006 .
[6] Kenneth L. Demerjian,et al. Measurements of ambient ammonia using a tunable diode laser absorption spectrometer: Characteristics of ambient ammonia emissions in an urban area of New York City , 2006 .
[7] C I Davidson,et al. Semicontinuous measurements of organic carbon and acidity during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: implications for acid-catalyzed organic aerosol formation. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.
[9] A. Wexler,et al. Identification of sources of atmospheric PM at the Pittsburgh Supersite, Part I: Single particle analysis and filter-based positive matrix factorization , 2006 .
[10] A. Wexler,et al. Identification of sources of atmospheric PM at the Pittsburgh Supersite—Part II: Quantitative comparisons of single particle, particle number, and particle mass measurements , 2006 .
[11] D. R. Worsnop,et al. Hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols in Pittsburgh: insights into sources and processes of organic aerosols , 2005 .
[12] J. Smith,et al. A criterion for new particle formation in the sulfur-rich Atlanta atmosphere , 2005 .
[13] James N. Smith,et al. Chemical composition of atmospheric nanoparticles during nucleation events in Atlanta , 2005 .
[14] B. Turpin,et al. Fine particle emission profile for a large coke production facility based on highly time-resolved fence line measurements , 2005 .
[15] J. Schwartz,et al. Short term effects of particulate matter on cause specific mortality: effects of lags and modification by city characteristics , 2005, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
[16] Debbie A. Niemeier,et al. Evolution of particle number distribution near roadways. Part III: Traffic analysis and on-road size resolved particulate emission factors , 2005 .
[17] A. Fried,et al. Summertime ambient formaldehyde in five U.S. metropolitan areas: Nashville, Atlanta, Houston, Philadelphia, and Tampa. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.
[18] M. Molina,et al. Characterization of ambient aerosols in Mexico City during the MCMA-2003 campaign with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry - Part II: overview of the results at the CENICA supersite and comparison to previous studies , 2005 .
[19] Qi Zhang,et al. Deconvolution and quantification of hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass spectrometry. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.
[20] R. Brook,et al. Acute Blood Pressure Responses in Healthy Adults During Controlled Air Pollution Exposures , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.
[21] Dimitrios V. Vayenas,et al. Simulation of the thermodynamics and removal processes in the sulfate-ammonia-nitric acid system during winter: Implications for PM2.5 control strategies , 2005 .
[22] A. Wexler,et al. Size‐resolved fine and ultrafine particle composition in Baltimore, Maryland , 2005 .
[23] J. Ondov,et al. Highly time-resolved organic and elemental carbon measurements at the Baltimore Supersite in 2002 , 2005 .
[24] J. Ondov,et al. A new pseudodeterministic multivariate receptor model for individual source apportionment using highly time-resolved ambient concentration measurements : Particulate matter supersites , 2005 .
[25] C. Stanier,et al. Modeling of in situ ultrafine atmospheric particle formation in the eastern United States , 2005 .
[26] Qi Zhang,et al. Time- and size-resolved chemical composition of submicron particles in Pittsburgh: Implications for aerosol sources and processes , 2005 .
[27] Richard L. Verrier,et al. Association of Air Pollution with Increased Incidence of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias Recorded by Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.
[28] Jean Ferrières,et al. Ozone Air Pollution Is Associated With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2005, Circulation.
[29] C. Stanier,et al. Water content of ambient aerosol during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study : Particulate matter supersites , 2005 .
[30] Yifang Zhu,et al. Evolution of particle number distribution near roadways. Part II: the 'Road-to-Ambient' process , 2004 .
[31] Anthony S. Wexler,et al. Evolution of particle number distribution near roadways—Part I: analysis of aerosol dynamics and its implications for engine emission measurement , 2004 .
[32] D. Worsnop,et al. Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Composition During the PMTACS-NY 2001 Using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Part I: Mass Concentrations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .
[33] Kenneth L. Demerjian,et al. Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Composition During the PMTACS-NY 2001 Using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Part II: Chemically Speciated Mass Distributions Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .
[34] K. Strawbridge,et al. Towards an understanding of the fine particle variations in the LFV: integration of chemical, physical and meteorological observations , 2004 .
[35] A. Wexler,et al. The character of single particle sulfate in Baltimore , 2004 .
[36] C. Davidson,et al. Modeling the diurnal variation of nitrate during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study , 2004 .
[37] Qi Zhang,et al. Insights into the chemistry of new particle formation and growth events in Pittsburgh based on aerosol mass spectrometry. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.
[38] A. Wexler,et al. Number concentrations of fine and ultrafine particles containing metals , 2004 .
[39] PM data analysis: a comparison of two urban areas: Fresno and Atlanta , 2004 .
[40] A. Wexler,et al. Ultrafine nitrate particle events in Baltimore observed by real-time single particle mass spectrometry , 2004 .
[41] Cliff I. Davidson,et al. Semi-continuous PM2.5 inorganic composition measurements during the Pittsburgh air quality study , 2004 .
[42] Andrey Khlystov,et al. Ambient aerosol size distributions and number concentrations measured during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS) , 2004 .
[43] Charles E. Kolb,et al. Chase Studies of Particulate Emissions from in-use New York City Vehicles , 2004 .
[44] Allen L. Robinson,et al. Estimating the Secondary Organic Aerosol Contribution to PM2.5 Using the EC Tracer Method Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .
[45] J. Smith,et al. Measurements of Mexico City nanoparticle size distributions: Observations of new particle formation and growth , 2004 .
[46] J. Seinfeld,et al. Evolution of nanoparticle size and mixing state near the point of emission , 2004 .
[47] Douglas R. Worsnop,et al. Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory , 2004 .
[48] A. Wexler,et al. Mass spectrometry of individual particles between 50 and 750 nm in diameter at the Baltimore Supersite. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.
[49] A. Wexler,et al. Size‐resolved ultrafine particle composition analysis 2. Houston , 2003 .
[50] A. Wexler,et al. Size-resolved ultrafine particle composition analysis, 1. Atlanta , 2003 .
[51] D. Murphy,et al. Nitrate and oxidized organic ions in single particle mass spectra during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project , 2003 .
[52] P. Solomon,et al. Intercomparison of near real time monitors of PM2.5 nitrate and sulfate at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Atlanta Supersite , 2003 .
[53] S. Slanina,et al. Continuous wet denuder measurements of atmospheric nitric and nitrous acids during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite , 2003 .
[54] P. Dasgupta,et al. Pulsed excitation source multiplexed fluorometry for the simultaneous measurement of multiple analytes. Continuous measurement of atmospheric hydrogen peroxide and methyl hydroperoxide. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.
[55] R. Weber,et al. Short-Term Temporal Variation in PM2.5 Mass and Chemical Composition during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment, 1999 , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
[56] B. Turpin,et al. Origins of primary and secondary organic aerosol in Atlanta: results of time-resolved measurements during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.
[57] Yifang Zhu,et al. Study of ultrafine particles near a major highway with heavy-duty diesel traffic , 2002 .
[58] Yifang Zhu,et al. Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles Near a Major Highway , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
[59] Günter Oberdörster,et al. Ultrafine particles in the urban air: to the respiratory tract--and beyond? , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.
[60] A. Wexler,et al. Atmospheric aerosol models for systems including the ions H+, NH4+, Na+, SO42−, NO3−, Cl−, Br−, and H2O , 2002 .
[61] G. Cass,et al. An evaluation of the thermodynamic equilibrium assumption for fine particulate composition: Nitrate and ammonium during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Experiment , 2002 .
[62] William F. Smith,et al. Field measurement of acid gases and soluble anions in atmospheric particulate matter using a parallel plate wet denuder and an alternating filter-based automated analysis system. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.
[63] Xin Wang,et al. The Relationship between Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring Particle Density , 2002 .
[64] J. Chow,et al. A wintertime PM2.5 episode at the Fresno, CA, supersite , 2002 .
[65] P. Mcmurry,et al. Size distributions of 3-100-nm urban Atlanta aerosols: measurement and observations. , 2002, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.
[66] Da-Ren Chen,et al. Measurement of Atlanta Aerosol Size Distributions: Observations of Ultrafine Particle Events , 2001 .
[67] Rodney J. Weber,et al. A Particle-into-Liquid Collector for Rapid Measurement of Aerosol Bulk Chemical Composition , 2001 .
[68] Da-Ren Chen,et al. Size distributions of 3–10 nm atmospheric particles: implications for nucleation mechanisms , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[69] B. Turpin,et al. Evaluation of Time-Resolved PM2.5 Data in Urban/Suburban Areas of New Jersey , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
[70] J F Louis,et al. Guidance for the Performance Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Air Quality Modeling Systems for Particulate Matter and Visibility , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
[71] Paul A. Solomon,et al. Comparison of scientific findings from major ozone field studies in North America and Europe , 2000 .
[72] K. Coakley,et al. Novel method to classify aerosol particles according to their mass-to-charge ratio—Aerosol particle mass analyser , 1996 .
[73] B. Turpin,et al. Identification of secondary organic aerosol episodes and quantitation of primary and secondary organic aerosol concentrations during SCAQS , 1995 .
[74] A. Wexler,et al. Growth laws for atmospheric aerosol particles: An examination of the bimodality of the accumulation mode , 1995 .
[75] Harold J. Annegarn,et al. Source profiles by unique ratios (SPUR) analysis: Determination of source profiles from receptor-site streaker samples , 1992 .
[76] M. Cheng,et al. The effect of sampling duration on the ability to resolve source types using factor analysis , 1989 .
[77] G. Gordon,et al. Receptor models. , 1988, Environmental science & technology.
[78] R. Stull. An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .
[79] D. Ensor,et al. Size Distribution of Fine Particles from Coal Combustion , 1982, Science.