Differential 18F-FDG and 3′-Deoxy-3′-18F-Fluorothymidine PET Responses to Pharmacologic Inhibition of the c-MET Receptor in Preclinical Tumor Models

The ability of PET to image functional changes in tumors is increasingly being used to evaluate response and predict clinical benefit to conventional and novel cancer therapies. Although the use of 18F-FDG PET is well established, 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET has potential advantages as a more specific marker of cellular proliferation. c-MET signaling is frequently dysregulated in cancer and is therefore an attractive therapeutic target. Crizotinib (PF-2341066) is a novel adenosine triphosphate–competitive c-MET kinase inhibitor with antitumor activity in a range of tumor models. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of PET of glucose metabolism and cell proliferation to monitor tumor response to crizotinib in 2 cell lines with aberrant c-MET signaling. Methods: Mice bearing GTL-16 or U87MG xenografts were evaluated for changes in tumor volume and 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT uptake after daily oral treatment with up to 50 mg/kg crizotinib. GTL-16 and U87MG cells were treated with crizotinib in vitro and analyzed for 3H-2-deoxyglucose uptake and expression of activated MET, AKT, and ERK by immunoblotting. Results: Treatment of c-MET–amplified GTL-16 xenografts with 50 mg/kg crizotinib caused tumor regression that was associated with a slow reduction in 18F-FDG uptake (P < 0.05, day 13) and reduced expression of the glucose transporter 1, GLUT-1. Although baseline 18F-FDG uptake into U87MG tumors was substantially higher than in GTL-16 tumors, 18F-FDG uptake into U87MG tumors remained unchanged on treatment at 50 mg/kg crizotinib, despite tumor growth inhibition of 93% on day 8 of treatment. These findings were confirmed in vitro, where treatment of U87MG cells with 1 μM crizotinib had no demonstrable effect on glucose uptake. Furthermore, these cells demonstrated constitutive, crizotinib-independent phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway signaling as demonstrated by phosphorylated AKT and ribosomal protein S6. Both U87MG and GTL-16 tumors showed high baseline uptake of 18F-FLT, which was reduced by 50% and 53% on days 4 and 8 of treatment, respectively. Conclusion: While the results provide a strong rationale to investigate the use of 18F-FLT PET as a clinical biomarker for monitoring tumor response to c-MET inhibition, 18F-FDG PET may be a less robust marker.

[1]  C. Paweletz,et al.  MK-2461, a novel multitargeted kinase inhibitor, preferentially inhibits the activated c-Met receptor. , 2010, Cancer research.

[2]  Stephen K Burley,et al.  SGX523 is an exquisitely selective, ATP-competitive inhibitor of the MET receptor tyrosine kinase with antitumor activity in vivo , 2009, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[3]  G. V. Vande Woude,et al.  Novel Therapeutic Inhibitors of the c-Met Signaling Pathway in Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  John O. Prior,et al.  Early prediction of response to sunitinib after imatinib failure by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Roman K. Thomas,et al.  Early Detection of Erlotinib Treatment Response in NSCLC by 3′-Deoxy-3′-[18F]-Fluoro-L-Thymidine ([18F]FLT) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) , 2008, PloS one.

[6]  John C Gore,et al.  Molecular Imaging of Therapeutic Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Blockade in Colorectal Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  P. Workman,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of cell proliferation following mitogenic extracellular kinase inhibition by PD0325901 , 2008, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[8]  M. Phelps,et al.  Changes in Tumor Metabolism as Readout for Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Kinase Inhibition by Rapamycin in Glioblastoma , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  K. Rex,et al.  c-Met Inhibitors with Novel Binding Mode Show Activity against Several Hereditary Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma-related Mutations* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Kevin Brindle,et al.  New approaches for imaging tumour responses to treatment , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[11]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Preclinical Efficacy of the c-Met Inhibitor CE-355621 in a U87 MG Mouse Xenograft Model Evaluated by 18F-FDG Small-Animal PET , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Shinji Yamazaki,et al.  An orally available small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, PF-2341066, exhibits cytoreductive antitumor efficacy through antiproliferative and antiangiogenic mechanisms. , 2007, Cancer research.

[13]  R. Salgia,et al.  c-Met Is a Potentially New Therapeutic Target for Treatment of Human Melanoma , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  M. Westphal,et al.  A Novel One-Armed Anti-c-Met Antibody Inhibits Glioblastoma Growth In vivo , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  H. Barthel,et al.  Redistribution of nucleoside transporters to the cell membrane provides a novel approach for imaging thymidylate synthase inhibition by positron emission tomography. , 2006, Cancer research.

[16]  Saroj P. Mathupala,et al.  Hexokinase II: Cancer's double-edged sword acting as both facilitator and gatekeeper of malignancy when bound to mitochondria , 2006, Oncogene.

[17]  Jilin Sun,et al.  Fully human monoclonal antibodies to hepatocyte growth factor with therapeutic potential against hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met-dependent human tumors. , 2006, Cancer research.

[18]  David Binns,et al.  Multi-tracer small animal PET imaging of the tumour response to the novel pan-Erb-B inhibitor CI-1033 , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  J. Christensen,et al.  c-Met as a target for human cancer and characterization of inhibitors for therapeutic intervention. , 2005, Cancer letters.

[20]  R. Blasberg,et al.  Proliferation-dependent changes in amino acid transport and glucose metabolism in glioma cell lines , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  J. Christensen,et al.  c-Met: Structure, functions and potential for therapeutic inhibition , 2003, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[22]  W. Birchmeier,et al.  Met, metastasis, motility and more , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[23]  J Nuyts,et al.  18FDG-Positron emission tomography for the early prediction of response in advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with imatinib mesylate (Glivec). , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[24]  B. Davidson,et al.  The FASEB Journal express article 10.1096/fj.01-0421fje. Published online November 29, 2001. , 2022 .

[25]  J. Laterra,et al.  Signaling pathways in the induction of c‐met receptor expression by its ligand scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor in human glioblastoma , 2001, Journal of neurochemistry.

[26]  Otto Muzik,et al.  Imaging proliferation in vivo with [F-18]FLT and positron emission tomography , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[27]  T. A. Smith,et al.  FDG uptake, tumour characteristics and response to therapy: A review , 1998, Nuclear medicine communications.

[28]  M. Weinand,et al.  Scatter factor expression and regulation in human glial tumors , 1996, International journal of cancer.

[29]  C. Cooper,et al.  Tyrosine kinase receptor indistinguishable from the c-met protein , 1989, Nature.

[30]  J. Sarkaria,et al.  An orally bioavailable c-Met kinase inhibitor potently inhibits brain tumor malignancy and growth. , 2010, Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry.

[31]  E. Lengyel,et al.  An orally available small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, PF-2341066, reduces tumor burden and metastasis in a preclinical model of ovarian cancer metastasis. , 2010, Neoplasia.