Viability of Aquatic Plant Fragments following Desiccation

Abstract Desiccation following prolonged air exposure challenges survival of aquatic plants during droughts, water drawdowns, and overland dispersal. To improve predictions of plant response to air exposure, we observed the viability of vegetative fragments of 10 aquatic plant species (Cabomba caroliniana, Ceratophyllum demersum, Elodea canadensis, Egeria densa, Myriophyllum aquaticum, Myriophyllum heterophyllum, Myriophyllum spicatum, Potamogeton crispus, Potamogeton richardsonii, and Hydrilla verticillata) following desiccation. We recorded mass loss, desiccation rate, and plant fragment survival across a range of air exposures. Mass loss accurately predicted viability of aquatic plant fragments upon reintroduction to water. However, similar periods of air exposure differentially affected viability between species. Understanding viability following desiccation can contribute to predicting dispersal, improving eradication protocols, and disposing of aquatic plants following removal from invaded lakes or contaminated equipment. Nomenclature: Brazilian egeria, Egeria densa Planch., common elodea, Elodea canadensis Michx., coontail, Ceratophyllum demersum L., curlyleaf pondweed, Potamogeton crispus L., Eurasian watermilfoil, Myriophyllum spicatum L., fanwort, Cabomba caroliniana Gray, hydrilla, Hydrilla verticillata (L. f.) Royle, parrotfeather, Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc., Richardson's pondweed, Potamogeton richardsonii (A. Bennett) Rydb., variable-leaf watermilfoil, Myriophyllum heterophyllum Michx Management Implications: A framework for assessing the vulnerability of ecosystems to invasion by aquatic weeds must consider many aspects of species invasions: which species will arrive, how will they get there, and will they establish and generate impacts following introduction. Knowledge about physiological responses to stressors provides critical input to such a framework. In our study, we compared the viability of vegetative fragments of 10 aquatic plant species following variable periods of desiccation. We found that while desiccation expectedly decreased plant viability, desiccation rates and tolerances differed significantly between plant species. The species-specific nature of desiccation warrants species-specific management actions. Our results suggest that boat launch inspection programs should be extra vigilant in their search for species that are relatively desiccation-resistant or –tolerant, such as emergent Myriophyllum aquaticum. On the other hand, our finding that some common invasive plants (Ceratophyllum demersum, Hydrilla verticillata) are comparatively intolerant to air exposure suggests that for these species, greater attention should be given to specific situations that promote insulation of vegetative material (e.g., entrainment in nets or anchor wells, burial in sediments), plant propagules that are more tolerant or resistant to desiccation (e.g., seeds or tubers), and alternative invasion pathways (e.g., water garden contaminants).

[1]  Xavier Robin,et al.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[2]  P. M. Wade,et al.  Influences of environmental conditions on macrophyte communities in drought‐affected headwater streams , 2006 .

[3]  D. Richardson,et al.  Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  P. Alpert The discovery, scope, and puzzle of desiccation tolerance in plants , 2000, Plant Ecology.

[5]  Jeffrey C. Kimbel Factors influencing potential intralake colonization by Myriophyllum spicatum L. , 1982 .

[6]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Aquatic Invasive Species Transport via Trailered Boats: What is Being Moved, Who is Moving it, and What Can Be Done , 2010 .

[7]  A. Green,et al.  How frequent is external transport of seeds and invertebrate eggs by waterbirds? A study in Doñana , SW Spain , 2002 .

[8]  C. Howard-Williams,et al.  The role of recreational boat traffic in interlake dispersal of macrophytes: a New Zealand case study. , 1985 .

[9]  Q. Zhang,et al.  Tolerance of Sargassum thunbergii germlings to thermal, osmotic and desiccation stress , 2012 .

[10]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Eurasian watermilfoil fitness loss and invasion potential following desiccation during simulated overland transport. , 2012 .

[11]  B. Vanschoenwinkel,et al.  Dispersal of freshwater invertebrates by large terrestrial mammals: a case study with wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Mediterranean wetlands , 2008 .

[12]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[13]  J. Bewley Physiological Aspects of Desiccation Tolerance , 1979 .

[14]  H. Griffiths,et al.  Plant responses to water stress. , 2002, Annals of botany.

[15]  Anthony Ricciardi,et al.  Overland dispersal of aquatic invasive species: a risk assessment of transient recreational boating. , 2001 .

[16]  J. Olden,et al.  A management framework for preventing the secondary spread of aquatic invasive species , 2008 .

[17]  M. Barrat-Segretain,et al.  Response of invasive macrophyte species to drawdown: The case of Elodea sp. , 2007 .