Reorienting Driver Attention with Dynamic Tactile Cues

A series of three experiments was designed to investigate whether the presentation of moving tactile warning signals that are presented in a particular spatiotemporal configuration may be particularly effective in terms of facilitating a driver's response to a target event. In the experiments reported here, participants' visual attention was manipulated such that they were either attending to the frontal object that might occasionally approach them on a collision course, or else they were distracted by a color discrimination task presented from behind. We measured how rapidly participants were able to initiate a braking response to a looming visual target following the onset of vibrotactile warning signals presented from around their waist. The vibrotactile warning signals consisted of single, double, and triple upward moving cues (Experiment 1), triple upward and downward moving cues (Experiment 2), and triple random cues (Experiment 3). The results demonstrated a significant performance advantage following the presentation of dynamic triple cues over the static single tactile cues, regardless of the specific configuration of the triple cues. These findings point to the potential benefits of embedding dynamic information in warning signals for dynamic target events. These findings have important implications for the design of future vibrotactile warning signals.

[1]  Charles Spence,et al.  Drive safely with neuroergonomics , 2012 .

[2]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Charles Spence,et al.  The Multisensory Driver: Implications for Ergonomic Car Interface Design , 2012 .

[4]  Lorna M. Brown,et al.  Multidimensional tactons for non-visual information presentation in mobile devices , 2006, Mobile HCI.

[5]  C. Spence,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[6]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Driver Reaction Time to Tactile and Auditory Rear-End Collision Warnings While Talking on a Cell Phone , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Dynamic and predictive links between touch and vision , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Christian A. Müller,et al.  Multimodal Input in the Car, Today and Tomorrow , 2011, IEEE MultiMedia.

[9]  J. Driver,et al.  Looming sounds enhance orientation sensitivity for visual stimuli on the same side as such sounds , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Lateral Control Assistance for Car Drivers: A Comparison of Motor Priming and Warning Systems , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Hendrik A. H. C. van Veen,et al.  Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt , 2005, TAP.

[12]  Rob Gray,et al.  Looming Auditory Collision Warnings for Driving , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[13]  J C Stevens,et al.  Spatial acuity of the body surface over the life span. , 1996, Somatosensory & motor research.

[14]  Lynette A. Jones,et al.  Tactile display and vibrotactile pattern recognition on the torso , 2006, Adv. Robotics.

[15]  John D. Lee,et al.  Driver Distraction : Theory, Effects, and Mitigation , 2008 .

[16]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes , 2005 .

[17]  J. V. Erp,et al.  Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system , 2004 .

[18]  Keith Redmill,et al.  Systems for Safety and Autonomous Behavior in Cars: The DARPA Grand Challenge Experience , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Using Peripersonal Warning Signals to Orient a Driver’s Gaze , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[20]  D. Moore,et al.  Auditory Neuroscience: The Salience of Looming Sounds , 2003, Current Biology.

[21]  C. A. Pickering The search for a safer driver interface: a review of gesture recognition human machine interface , 2005 .