External knowledge sourcing in biotechnology through acquisition versus alliance: A KBV approach

Knowledge sourcing is important for firms, especially in fast-paced industries. However, few studies explore the effects of knowledge-based predictors on the comparative choice of employing acquisitions versus alliances for sourcing external knowledge. This study extends the limited existing research on this topic. It simultaneously examines the effects of knowledge domain attributes, seeker and source experience-based knowledge, and dyad knowledge similarity and digestibility on whether a firm chooses an acquisition or alliance when sourcing external knowledge. Data is comprised of 209 research-driven acquisitions and alliances of biotechnology firms based in North America. Our findings reveal that external knowledge sourcing through acquisition is more likely when the knowledge domain is more complex and valuable. Acquisition is also preferred when the seeker has greater acquisition experience and when the source has accumulated a moderate level of alliance experience. Alliance, in contrast, is the chosen mode for accessing external knowledge when the knowledge is high in specificity and when the seeker has prior alliance experience. In addition, increasing similarity and digestibility of the dyad's knowledge bases strengthen the relationship between knowledge value and the probability of acquisition versus alliance. These results extend understanding of how firms decide to augment their knowledge resources in a knowledge-intensive industry. They also demonstrate that a multilevel KBV approach emphasizing knowledge characteristics uncovers important predictors of strategy and structure in research-driven organizations.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  Carl P. Zeithaml,et al.  Measuring organizational knowledge: a conceptual and methodological framework , 2003 .

[3]  Sabine Reddy,et al.  The choice between mergers/acquisitions and joint ventures : The case of Japanese investors in the United States , 1997 .

[4]  Timothy B. Folta.  Governance and uncertainty: the trade‐off between administrative control and commitment , 1998 .

[5]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[6]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Transfer of Marketing Know-How in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Investigation of the Role and Antecedents of Knowledge Ambiguity , 1999 .

[7]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Close to You? Bias and Precision in Patent-Based Measures of Technological Proximity , 2007 .

[8]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[9]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  On The Performance Of Technology-Sourcing Partnerships: The Interaction Between Partner Interdependence And Technology Attributes , 2000 .

[10]  R. David,et al.  A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics , 2004 .

[11]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Firm-Specificity in Corporate Applied R&D , 1994 .

[12]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres,et al.  Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries : Theory and evidence , 1989 .

[13]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[14]  Joanne E. Oxley,et al.  The Scope and Governance of International R&D Alliances , 2003 .

[15]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[16]  Vivienne Shaw,et al.  Knowledge Transfers in Acquisitions - An Exploratory Study and Model , 2005 .

[17]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Acquisition or greenfield start-up? Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences , 2000 .

[18]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[19]  Taewon Suh,et al.  Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: a meta-analytical review , 2004 .

[20]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry , 1999 .

[21]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences , 2008 .

[22]  Rachelle C. Sampson.  Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances , 2005 .

[23]  Peter J. Buckley,et al.  An Economic Model of International Joint Venture Strategy , 1996 .

[24]  R. Gulati.  Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[25]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[26]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Transaction cost-enhanced entry mode choices and firm performance. , 2003 .

[27]  Andrew C. Inkpen.  Learning Through Joint Ventures: A Framework Of Knowledge Acquisition , 2000 .

[28]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Managing the Post-acquisition Integration Process: How the Human Iintegration and Task Integration Processes Interact to Foster Value Creation , 2000 .

[29]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm , 1998 .

[30]  Terry L. Amburgey,et al.  Knowledge Sourcing in Foreign Direct Investments: An Empirical Examination of Target Profiles , 2005 .

[31]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Mergers and acquisitions : their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries , 2006 .

[32]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[33]  N. Rajagopalan,et al.  The Influence of Acquisition Experience and Performance on Acquisition Behavior: Evidence From the U.S. Commercial Banking Industry , 2006 .

[34]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[35]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Boundaries of the Firm: Insights From International Entry Mode Research , 2007 .

[36]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[37]  Niels Noorderhaven,et al.  External Technology Sourcing Through Alliances or Acquisitions: An Analysis of the Application-Specific Integrated Circuits Industry , 2002 .

[38]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset Stock Accumulation and the Sustainability of Competitive Advantage: Reply , 1989 .

[39]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[40]  B. Kogut,et al.  Capabilities as Real Options , 2001 .

[41]  H. Barkema,et al.  Learning Through Acquisitions , 2001 .

[42]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  When to ally & when to acquire. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[43]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[44]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[45]  D. D. Carolis,et al.  Competencies and Imitability in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of Their Relationship with Firm Performance , 2003 .

[46]  Bernard L. Simonin.  The Importance of Collaborative Know-How: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization , 1997 .

[47]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[48]  Niron Hashai,et al.  R&D Intensity, Value Appropriation and Integration Patterns within Organizational Boundaries , 2008 .

[49]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[50]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[51]  Dimo Dimov,et al.  Internal Knowledge Development and External Knowledge Access in Venture Capital Investment Performance , 2008 .

[52]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Technological Knowledge Base, R&D Organization Structure and Alliance Formation: Evidence from the Biopharmaceutical Industry , 2007 .

[53]  E. Zajac,et al.  Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations , 2007 .

[54]  S. Balakrishnan,et al.  Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint-ventures* Theory and evidence , 1993 .

[55]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[56]  Werner H. Hoffmann,et al.  Acquire or Ally? -- A Strategy Framework for Deciding between Acquisition and Cooperation , 2001 .

[57]  Jun Xia,et al.  Mimetic entry and bandwagon effect: the rise and decline of international equity joint venture in China , 2008 .

[58]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[59]  B. Chakravarthy,et al.  The persistence of knowledge‐based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge , 2002 .

[60]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[61]  A. Madhok.  COST, VALUE AND FOREIGN MARKET ENTRY MODE: THE TRANSACTION AND THE FIRM , 1997 .

[62]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-Based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or- Buy Decisions in Information Services , 1997 .

[63]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/mde.1126 Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle , 2022 .

[64]  A. McGahan,et al.  The choice among acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures , 2005 .

[65]  X. Martin,et al.  Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation , 2003 .

[66]  G. Ahuja.  The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[67]  Ellen R. Auster.  The Relationship of Industry Evolution to Patterns of Technological Linkages, Joint Ventures, and Direct Investment Between U.S. and Japan , 1992 .

[68]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Acquisition Integration and Productivity Losses in the Technical Core: Disruption of Inventors in Acquired Companies , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[69]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[70]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  How do firms’ knowledge bases affect intra-industry heterogeneity? ☆: An analysis of the Spanish pharmaceutical industry , 2005 .

[71]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[72]  Douglas J. Miller,et al.  An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm , 2003 .

[73]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[74]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[75]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[76]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[77]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[78]  A. Madhok.  Crossroads---The Organization of Economic Activity: Transaction Costs, Firm Capabilities, and the Nature of Governance , 1996 .

[79]  J. Hennart,et al.  The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: an empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the united states , 1991 .

[80]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .