Digital Science: Cyberinfrastructure, e-Science and Citizen Science

Digital change and scientific development have mutual implications. On one hand, science and technology development has been a major factor to digital change. On the other hand, the digital era has brought major changes to scientific knowledge production. First, there is a cyberinfrastructure—not only infrastructure for computing, but a major virtual lab where all professionals in science and technology (e.g., researchers, engineers, technicians) can collaborate and exchange data, information, and knowledge. In Europe, this new infrastructure is referred to as e-science. Second, the digital era has increased coproduction beyond frontiers of traditional players, bringing other participants to scientific development. Such kind of co-work is central to both citizen science and transdisciplinary knowledge coproduction, where non-academic players engage in activities such as planning, data gathering, and impact assessment of science. In this chapter, we define digital science as a convergent phenomenon of cyberinfrastructure, e-science, citizen science and transdisciplinarity. We examine how digital science has been a disruptive factor to traditional scientific development, changing productivity, expanding frontiers and challenging traditional processes in science, such as planning and assessment.

[1]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[2]  Marie K. Harder,et al.  What lies beneath the surface? The hidden complexities of organizational change for sustainability in higher education , 2015 .

[3]  Wayne G. Lutters,et al.  (Re)defining Land Change Science through Synthetic Research Practices , 2015, CSCW.

[4]  Vickie Curtis,et al.  Online citizen science projects : an exploration of motivation, contribution and participation , 2015 .

[5]  David Ribes,et al.  Sociotechnical Studies of Cyberinfrastructure and e-Research: Current Themes and Future Trajectories , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[6]  Rick Bonney,et al.  The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement , 2012 .

[7]  James Wang Wei,et al.  Citizen Science and the Urban Ecology of Birds and Butterflies — A Systematic Review , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  Chris Mattmann,et al.  Software reuse methods to improve technological infrastructure for e-Science , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration.

[9]  A. Irwin Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1995 .

[10]  M. Gorman,et al.  The challenge of funding interdisciplinary research: A look inside public research funding agencies , 2016 .

[11]  Bill Spencer,et al.  CSCW and cyberinfrastructure: opportunities and challenges , 2004, CSCW.

[12]  S. Fawcett,et al.  Data Science, Predictive Analytics, and Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform Supply Chain Design and Management , 2013 .

[13]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Research: Implications of Uncertainty , 2017, CSCW.

[14]  Robert Frodeman Sustainable Knowledge: A Theory of Interdisciplinarity , 2013 .

[15]  Antoine H. C. van Kampen,et al.  Science Gateway Canvas: A business reference model for Science Gateways , 2015, SCREAM@HPDC.

[16]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[17]  E. Seltzer,et al.  Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing , 2013 .

[18]  Anne E. Trefethen,et al.  The UK e-Science Core Programme and the Grid , 2002, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[19]  Alison Donnelly,et al.  The role of citizen science in monitoring biodiversity in Ireland , 2014, International Journal of Biometeorology.

[20]  Geoffrey C. Fox,et al.  Examining the Challenges of Scientific Workflows , 2007, Computer.

[21]  R. Denhardt,et al.  The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering , 2002 .

[22]  Adam J. Mills,et al.  Crowdsourcing and brand control , 2017 .

[23]  Marina Jirotka,et al.  Supporting Scientific Collaboration: Methods, Tools and Concepts , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[24]  I. Foster,et al.  The grid: computing without bounds. , 2003, Scientific American.

[25]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Synergizing in Cyberinfrastructure Development , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[26]  C. Lintott,et al.  Galaxy Zoo: Exploring the Motivations of Citizen Science Volunteers. , 2009, 0909.2925.

[27]  R. Bonney,et al.  Next Steps for Citizen Science , 2014, Science.

[28]  Regina Lenart-Gansiniec Crowd Capital – Conceptualisation Attempt , 2016 .

[29]  Giri Narasimhan,et al.  CyberBridges A Model Collaboration Infrastructure for e-Science , 2007, CCGRID.

[30]  Juma Hemed Lungo,et al.  Citizen sensors or extreme publics? Transparency and accountability interventions on the mobile geoweb , 2014, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[31]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms , 2012, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[32]  Mohammad Gharesifard,et al.  Towards benchmarking citizen observatories: Features and functioning of online amateur weather networks. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  Kihyeon Cho A test of the interoperability of grid middleware for the Korean High Energy Physics Data Grid system , 2007 .