Spatial benefits on speech intelligibility in real classroom acoustics under energetic and informational masking noise

Challenging acoustic conditions, i.e. high noise and long reverberation time, negatively affect speech intelligibility. This is particularly true for school environments where learning is delivered, and students of every age develop their cognitive abilities. Research has primarily focused on the effect of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility and on the spatial release from masking under laboratory conditions, whereas few studies considered these aspects ecologically. Also, the effect of noise on speech intelligibility was widely investigated considering its energetic rather than its informative content. This work deepens the extent to which the spatial release from masking is affected by reverberation and noise under real classroom acoustics, in order to help the design of learning environments to enhance speech intelligibility. Binaural room impulse responses were acquired at increasing speaker-to-listener distances, with noise sources at 0°, 120° and 180° from the listener’s head, in classrooms with reverberation times ranging from 0.4 s to 3.5 s, as to represent the typical conditions of Italian schools. Then, listening tests were performed: the impulse responses were convolved with speech and noise anechoic stimuli, and presented via headphone to a selected panel of normal hearing adults. Further analyses are now in progress; preliminary results reveal that speech intelligibility is worse under higher reverberation times and, averagely, under informational masking noise, as expected. As far as the spatial release from masking is concerned, when longer reverberation times are present in the room there is a tendency to have greater benefits under informational noise.

[1]  A. Duquesnoy Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  E. C. Cmm,et al.  on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .

[3]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Young-Ji Choi,et al.  Effects of periodic type diffusers on classroom acoustics , 2013 .

[5]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Effect of the orientation of the speaker's head and azimuth of a noise source on the speech reception threshold for sentences , 1980 .

[6]  Adam Westermann,et al.  The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R Plomp,et al.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Assessment of indoor ambient noise level in school classrooms , 2015 .

[9]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  Evaluation of internationally compatible speech test in noise for the pediatric population , 2017 .

[11]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[12]  Irwin Pollack,et al.  Auditory informational masking , 1975 .

[13]  W. Hartmann,et al.  The role of reverberation in release from masking due to spatial separation of sources for speech identification , 2005 .

[14]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Four-day-follow-up study on the voice monitoring of primary school teachers: Relationships with conversational task and classroom acoustics. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Andrea Gasparella,et al.  Using listening effort assessment in the acoustical design of rooms for speech , 2018 .

[16]  D D Dirks,et al.  The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  Pasquale Bottalico,et al.  Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  A. Bronkhorst The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[19]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  Optimal classroom acoustic design with sound absorption and diffusion for the enhancement of speech intelligibility , 2017 .

[20]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Acustica delle aule scolastiche. Requisiti prestazionali, soluzioni di progetto, verifiche a calcolo e in opera. , 2010 .

[21]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Influence of classroom acoustics on the reading speed: A case study on Italian second-graders. , 2018, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[23]  Nicola Prodi,et al.  On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: ranking of noise interference and of age influence. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Four-day Follow-up Study on the Self-reported Voice Condition and Noise Condition of Teachers: Relationship Between Vocal Parameters and Classroom Acoustics. , 2017, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.