International patent families: from application strategies to statistical indicators

This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the characteristics of international patent families, including their domestic component. We exploit a relatively under-studied feature of patent families, namely the number of patents covering the same invention within a given jurisdiction. Using this information, we highlight common patterns in the structure of international patent families, which reflect both the patenting strategies of innovators and the peculiarities of the different patent systems. While the literature has extensively used family size, i.e. the number of countries in which a given invention is protected, as a measure of patent value, our results suggest that the number of patent filings in the priority country within a patent family as well as the timespan between the first and last filings within a family are other insightful indicators of the value of patented innovations.

[1]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Pioneering Inventors or Thicket-Builders: Which Firms Use Continuations in Patenting? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[3]  Ufuk Akcigit,et al.  Patent Value and Citations: Creative Destruction or Strategic Disruption? , 2013 .

[4]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  The links between competitiveness, firms' innovative activities and public R&D support in Germany: an empirical analysis , 1997 .

[5]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.

[6]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[7]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Scale, Scope and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Ethical Drug Discovery , 2015 .

[8]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Recent Research on the Economics of Patents , 2012 .

[9]  James E. Bessen,et al.  Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk , 2008 .

[10]  John R. Allison,et al.  The Business Method Patent Myth , 2003 .

[11]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[12]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology output , 2001 .

[13]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[14]  K. Pavitt,et al.  R&D Patenting and Innovative Activities : A Statistical Exploration : Research Policy , 1982 .

[15]  Joshua Lerner,et al.  Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It , 2011 .

[16]  P. Aghion,et al.  Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry , 2012, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Deepak Hegde,et al.  What is a Patent Worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent “Lottery” , 2017 .

[18]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Determinants of Opposition against EPO Patent Grants – The Case of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals ∗ , 2002 .

[19]  M. Glachant,et al.  Invention and Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies : A Global Analysis Prepared for the Review of Environmental Economics and Policy , 2010 .

[20]  S. Athey,et al.  Investment and Market Dominance , 2001 .

[21]  Dominique Guellec,et al.  Claiming More: The Increased Voluminosity of Patent Applications and its Determinants , 2006 .

[22]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[23]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Ending Abuse of Patent Continuations , 2003 .

[24]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[25]  Deepak Hegde,et al.  The Bright Side of Patents , 2016 .

[26]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[27]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Reprinted Article The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995 , 2009 .

[28]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  The Worldwide Count of Priority Patents: A New Indicator of Inventive Activity , 2012 .

[29]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  A brief history of space and time: The scope-year index as a patent value indicator based on families and renewals , 2008, Scientometrics.

[30]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[31]  Catalina Martínez,et al.  Insight into Different Types of Patent Families , 2010 .

[32]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems , 2005, Scientometrics.

[33]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms , 2001 .

[34]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Transnational patents and international markets , 2009, Scientometrics.

[35]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[36]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[37]  Catalina Martínez,et al.  Patent families: When do different definitions really matter? , 2010, Scientometrics.

[38]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[39]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Filing strategies and patent value , 2011 .

[40]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Applications, grants and the value of patent , 2000 .

[41]  Nicolas van Zeebroeck,et al.  The puzzle of patent value indicators , 2011 .

[42]  D. Harhoff,et al.  The Value of European Patents , 2008 .

[43]  Mark Rogers,et al.  The value of intellectual property rights to firms and society , 2007 .

[44]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems , 2004 .

[45]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  Measuring the globalisation of technology: An approach based on patent data , 2004 .

[46]  Bronwyn H Hall.  Exploring the Patent Explosion , 2004, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[47]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  National Systems of Innovation in Comparison: Structure and Performance Indicators for Knowledge Societies , 2006 .

[48]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement , 1999 .

[49]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[50]  Janusz A. Ordover,et al.  A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion , 1991 .

[51]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition , 2001 .

[52]  Ashish Arora,et al.  The Value of International Patent Rights , 2001 .

[53]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Unified and Integrated European Patent Litigation System, Final Report to the European Commission , 2009 .

[54]  Deepak Hegde,et al.  Examiner Citations, Applicant Citations, and the Private Value of Patents , 2009 .

[55]  M. Reitzig.  Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales , 2004 .

[56]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Rate of Obsolescence of Knowledge, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources , 1979 .

[57]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Foundations of the economics of innovation : theory, measurement and practice , 1998 .

[58]  J. Davidson Frame,et al.  Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data , 1994 .

[59]  J Vanderdrift,et al.  Statistics of European patents on legal status and granting data , 1988 .

[60]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  The vulnerability of patent value determinants , 2011 .

[61]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Innovation , 1997 .

[63]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Technological Structures and Performance as Reflected by Patent Indicators , 2006 .

[64]  Ulrich Schmoch.  The Technological Output of Scientific Institutions , 2004 .

[65]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  THE INSTITUTIONAL SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE AND THE VALUE OF ACADEMIC PATENTS , 2007 .