Cortical ignition dynamics is tightly linked to the core organisation of the human connectome

The capability of cortical regions to flexibly sustain an “ignited” state of activity has been discussed in relation to conscious perception or hierarchical information processing. Here, we investigate how the intrinsic propensity of different regions to get ignited is determined by the specific topological organisation of the structural connectome. More specifically, we simulated the resting-state dynamics of mean-field whole-brain models and assessed how dynamic multi-stability and ignition differ between a reference model embedding a realistic human connectome, and alternative models based on a variety of randomised connectome ensembles. We found that the strength of global excitation needed to first trigger ignition in a subset of regions is substantially smaller for the model embedding the empirical human connectome. Furthermore, when increasing the strength of excitation, the propagation of ignition outside of this initial core –which is able to self-sustain its high activity– is way more gradual than for any of the randomised connectomes, allowing for graded control of the number of ignited regions. We explain both these assets in terms of the exceptional weighed core-shell organisation of the empirical connectome, speculating that this topology of human structural connectivity may be attuned to support an enhanced ignition dynamic. Author summary The activity of the cortex in mammals constantly fluctuates in relation to cognitive tasks, but also during rest. The ability of brain regions to display ignition, a fast transition from low to high activity is central for the emergence of conscious perception and decision making. Here, using a biophysically inspired model of cortical activity, we show how the structural organization of human cortex supports and constrains the rise of this ignited dynamics in spontaneous cortical activity. We found that the weighted core-shell organization of the human connectome allows for a uniquely graded ignition. This graded ignition implies a smooth control of the ignition in cortical areas tuned by the global excitability. The smooth control cannot be replicated by surrogate connectomes, even though they conserve key local or global network properties. Indeed, the first trigger of ignition in the human cortex has the lowest global excitability and corresponds with the strongest interconnected areas, the ignition core. Finally, we suggest developmental and evolutionary constraints of the mesoscale organization that support this enhanced ignition dynamics in cortical activity.

[1]  Habib Benali,et al.  Relating Structure and Function in the Human Brain: Relative Contributions of Anatomy, Stationary Dynamics, and Non-stationarities , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  Marc Timme,et al.  Dynamic information routing in complex networks , 2015, Nature Communications.

[3]  G. Deco,et al.  Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  The dynamics of resting fluctuations in the brain: metastability and its dynamical cortical core , 2016, bioRxiv.

[5]  Leonardo L. Gollo,et al.  Dwelling quietly in the rich club: brain network determinants of slow cortical fluctuations , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  Quantifying High-order Interdependencies via Multivariate Extensions of the Mutual Information , 2019, Physical review. E.

[7]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[8]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  The modulation of neural gain facilitates a transition between functional segregation and integration in the brain , 2017, bioRxiv.

[9]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[10]  Viviana Betti,et al.  Cortical cores in network dynamics , 2018, NeuroImage.

[11]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Resting state networks in empirical and simulated dynamic functional connectivity , 2016, NeuroImage.

[12]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Inter-areal Balanced Amplification Enhances Signal Propagation in a Large-Scale Circuit Model of the Primate Cortex , 2017, Neuron.

[13]  T. Prescott,et al.  The brainstem reticular formation is a small-world, not scale-free, network , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  O. Sporns Discovering the Human Connectome , 2012 .

[15]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Noise during Rest Enables the Exploration of the Brain's Dynamic Repertoire , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  C. E. Schroeder,et al.  Ignition’s glow: Ultra-fast spread of global cortical activity accompanying local “ignitions” in visual cortex during conscious visual perception , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Dynamic Brain: From Spiking Neurons to Neural Masses and Cortical Fields , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  Sebastiano Stramaglia,et al.  Interaction Information Along Lifespan of the Resting Brain Dynamics Reveals a Major Redundant Role of the Default Mode Network , 2018, bioRxiv.

[19]  Karin Schwab,et al.  Modeling Brain Resonance Phenomena Using a Neural Mass Model , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Jean Paul Maidana,et al.  Chaos versus noise as drivers of multistability in neural networks. , 2018, Chaos.

[21]  D. C. Essen,et al.  The Mouse Cortical Connectome, Characterized by an Ultra-Dense Cortical Graph, Maintains Specificity by Distinct Connectivity Profiles , 2018, Neuron.

[22]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Identification of Optimal Structural Connectivity Using Functional Connectivity and Neural Modeling , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  T. Ossandón,et al.  Commentary: Amplification and Suppression of Distinct Brainwide Activity Patterns by Catecholamines , 2019, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[24]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[25]  Annette Witt,et al.  Dynamic Effective Connectivity of Inter-Areal Brain Circuits , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  S. Bressler,et al.  Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  Amanda V. Utevsky,et al.  Precuneus Is a Functional Core of the Default-Mode Network , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[31]  Zoltán Toroczkai,et al.  The role of long-range connections on the specificity of the macaque interareal cortical network , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[33]  Yuval Shavitt,et al.  A model of Internet topology using k-shell decomposition , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  R. Vertes,et al.  Projections of the central medial nucleus of the thalamus in the rat: Node in cortical, striatal and limbic forebrain circuitry , 2012, Neuroscience.

[35]  O. Sporns,et al.  Rich Club Organization of Macaque Cerebral Cortex and Its Role in Network Communication , 2012, PloS one.

[36]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Functional connectivity dynamics: Modeling the switching behavior of the resting state , 2015, NeuroImage.

[37]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Fundamentals of Brain Network Analysis , 2016 .

[38]  J. Changeux,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Approaches to Conscious Processing , 2011, Neuron.

[39]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Emerges from Structurally and Dynamically Shaped Slow Linear Fluctuations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[41]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Hierarchy of Information Processing in the Brain: A Novel ‘Intrinsic Ignition’ Framework , 2017, Neuron.

[43]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  A Low Dimensional Description of Globally Coupled Heterogeneous Neural Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  K. Gurney,et al.  Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence , 2008, PloS one.

[45]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  M. Breakspear,et al.  The connectomics of brain disorders , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[47]  Diego Lombardo,et al.  Modular slowing of resting-state dynamic functional connectivity as a marker of cognitive dysfunction induced by sleep deprivation , 2020, NeuroImage.

[48]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Alexander Bailey,et al.  Automatic generation of graph models for complex networks by genetic programming , 2012, GECCO '12.

[50]  V. Calhoun,et al.  The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.

[51]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[52]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural Systems , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[54]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Spontaneous Fluctuations and Non-linear Ignitions: Two Dynamic Faces of Cortical Recurrent Loops , 2015, Neuron.

[55]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Cooperative and Competitive Spreading Dynamics on the Human Connectome , 2015, Neuron.

[56]  A. Owen,et al.  Are There Levels of Consciousness? , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  The Ubiquity of Small-World Networks , 2011, Brain Connect..

[58]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Connectivity and Brain Networks in Schizophrenia , 2010 .

[59]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Diversity of meso-scale architecture in human and non-human connectomes , 2017, Nature Communications.

[60]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Resting brains never rest: computational insights into potential cognitive architectures , 2013, Trends in Neurosciences.

[61]  Lev Muchnik,et al.  Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks , 2010, 1001.5285.

[62]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  A Unifying Framework for Measuring Weighted Rich Clubs , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[63]  M. Kramer,et al.  Beyond the Connectome: The Dynome , 2014, Neuron.

[64]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Consciousness as a graded and an all-or-none phenomenon: A conceptual analysis , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[65]  Christopher W. Lynn,et al.  The physics of brain network structure, function and control , 2018, Nature Reviews Physics.