Reliability of segmental accelerations measured using a new wireless gait analysis system.

The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability, and stride-to-stride reliability, of an accelerometer-based gait analysis system which measured 3D accelerations of the upper and lower body during self-selected slow, preferred and fast walking speeds. Eight subjects attended two testing sessions in which accelerometers were attached to the head, neck, lower trunk, and right shank. In the initial testing session, two different examiners attached the accelerometers and performed the same testing procedures. A single examiner repeated the procedure in a subsequent testing session. All data were collected using a new wireless gait analysis system, which features near real-time data transmission via a Bluetooth network. Reliability for each testing condition (4 locations, 3 directions, 3 speeds) was quantified using a waveform similarity statistic known as the coefficient of multiple determination (CMD). CMD's ranged from 0.60 to 0.98 across all test conditions and were not significantly different for inter-examiner (0.86), intra-examiner (0.87), and stride-to-stride reliability (0.86). The highest repeatability for the effect of location, direction and walking speed were for the shank segment (0.94), the vertical direction (0.91) and the fast walking speed (0.91), respectively. Overall, these results indicate that a high degree of waveform repeatability was obtained using a new gait system under test-retest conditions involving single and dual examiners. Furthermore, differences in acceleration waveform repeatability associated with the reapplication of accelerometers were small in relation to normal motor variability.

[1]  R. Moe-Nilssen Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometry during standing and walking. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  K R Westerterp,et al.  Physical activity pattern of children assessed by triaxial accelerometry , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[3]  B M Nigg,et al.  A method for inverse dynamic analysis using accelerometry. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  R S Barrett,et al.  Upper body accelerations during walking in healthy young and elderly men. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[5]  R. Moe-Nilssen,et al.  A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. Part 2: Gait analysis. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  Karl M Newell,et al.  The dynamics of resting and postural tremor in Parkinson's disease , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  D. Winter Foot trajectory in human gait: a precise and multifactorial motor control task. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[8]  Kuan Zhang,et al.  Measurement of human daily physical activity. , 2003, Obesity research.

[9]  R. Moe-Nilssen,et al.  Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[10]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking on level and irregular surfaces. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[11]  J. Hamill,et al.  Shock attenuation and stride frequency during running , 1995 .

[12]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Age-related differences in walking stability. , 2003, Age and ageing.

[13]  R. Barrett,et al.  Swing phase mechanics of healthy young and elderly men. , 2001, Human movement science.

[14]  A. Hof,et al.  Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[15]  David G Lloyd,et al.  Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R. Moe-Nilssen,et al.  A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. Part 1: The instrument. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Tardive dyskinesia and coupling constraints in inter-limb tremor , 1996 .

[18]  K. Aminian,et al.  Physical activity monitoring based on accelerometry: validation and comparison with video observation , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[19]  Jorunn L Helbostad,et al.  Estimation of gait cycle characteristics by trunk accelerometry. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  R C Wagenaar,et al.  Effects of walking velocity on relative phase dynamics in the trunk in human walking. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  H. K. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  W. Zijlstra,et al.  Estimation of hip abduction moment based on body fixed sensors. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  G. Lyons,et al.  The use of accelerometry to detect heel contact events for use as a sensor in FES assisted walking. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  Masatoshi Naito,et al.  Lateral thrust of anterior cruciate ligament-insufficient knees and posterior cruciate ligament-insufficient knees , 2002, International Orthopaedics.

[25]  A. Voloshin,et al.  An in vivo study of low back pain and shock absorption in the human locomotor system. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  P. Beek,et al.  Pelvis-thorax coordination in the transverse plane during gait. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[27]  J. Kavanagh,et al.  Coordination of head and trunk accelerations during walking , 2005, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[28]  K. An,et al.  Repeated measures of adult normal walking using a video tracking system 1 Presented in part at the 1 , 1997 .