Abstract Previous research has shown that Ti–6Al–4V exhibits pronounced stress ratio effects under high cycle fatigue (HCF) loading. At high stress ratios ( R >0.7), a transition of failure mode occurs from traditional surface fatigue crack initiation and growth to bulk-dominated damage initiation and coalescence of multiple microcracks consistent with a ductile tensile test. At these high stress ratios, ratchetting was shown to occur (Int. J. Fatigue 21 (1999) 679; Mech. Time-Dependent Mater. 2 (1999) 195), leading to progressive strain accumulation until final failure. This study explores the microstructural origins of this stress ratio transition in HCF using computational micromechanics. The material being studied is a two-phase Ti–6Al–4V plate forging, consisting of a duplex microstructure with a hexagonal close-packed (hcp) α-phase and lamellar grains with layers of body-centered cubic (bcc) β-phase and secondary hcp α-phase. Crystallographic slip is the dominant mode of plastic deformation in this material. A 2-D crystal plasticity model that incorporates nonlinear kinematic and isotropic hardening at the slip system level is implemented into the finite element method to simulate the cyclic plasticity behavior. The finite element model is used to qualitatively understand the distribution of microplasticity in this alloy under various loading conditions. For typical HCF stress amplitudes, it is shown that microstructure scale ratchetting becomes dominant at R =0.8, but is insignificant at R =0.1 and 0.5. Reversed cyclic microplasticity is insignificant at all three stress ratios. The effects of phase morphology and orientation distribution are shown to affect the microscale plastic strain distribution in terms of the location and magnitudes of the plastic shear bands that form within clusters or chains of primary α grains. The results of the finite element modeling are also considered in light of previous experimental results.
[1]
S. V. Harren,et al.
Nonuniform deformations in polycrystals and aspects of the validity of the Taylor model
,
1989
.
[2]
D. McDowell,et al.
Multiscale Polycrystal Plasticity
,
1999
.
[3]
David L. McDowell,et al.
Frequency and stress ratio effects in high cycle fatigue of Ti-6Al-4V
,
1999
.
[4]
David L. McDowell,et al.
Strain Accumulation in Ti-6Al-4V during Fatigue at High Mean Stress
,
1998
.
[5]
Mica Grujicic,et al.
Combined atomistic–crystal plasticity analysis of the effect of beta phase precipitates on deformation and fracture of lamellar γ + α2 titanium aluminide
,
1999
.
[6]
G. Lütjering.
Influence of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of (α+β) titanium alloys
,
1998
.
[7]
H. Margolin,et al.
Void nucleation and strain hardening
,
1989
.
[8]
L. Wagner,et al.
Microtextural effects on mechanical properties of duplex microstructures in (α+β) titanium alloys
,
1999
.
[9]
K. T. Ramesh,et al.
The high-strain-rate response of alpha-titanium: experiments, deformation mechanisms and modeling
,
1998
.
[10]
B. Hillberry,et al.
Load history effects on fatigue crack growth threshold for Ti–6Al–4V and Ti-17 titanium alloys
,
2001
.
[11]
Michael Ortiz,et al.
Computational modelling of single crystals
,
1993
.