Spatial compression in ultrasound imaging

High quality three dimensional ultrasound imaging is typically attained by increasing the amount of sensors, resulting in complex hardware. Compressing measurements before sensing addresses this problem, and could enable new clinical applications. We have developed an analogue compression technique, by positioning a plastic coding mask in front of the aperture, which distorts the ultrasound field by inducing varying local echo delays. This results in a compression of the spatial ultrasound field across the sensor surface, while retaining sufficient information for 3D imaging. Using only a single sensor, complementary measurements can be obtained by rotation of the sensor and the mask to increase the conditioning of the reconstruction problem. In this work, we study a method to optimize the shape of the coding mask. To this end, we define an approximate signal model that captures the ultrasound response of the mask, and use it to pose mask shape optimization as a sensor selection problem. We solve it by relaxing it to a convex problem, as well as by using a greedy selection method. Our simulation results show that these approaches are able to outperform the random design strategy, in particular when mask rotations are included in the problem.

[1]  G. Schmitz,et al.  Fast pulse-echo ultrasound imaging employing compressive sensing , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[2]  Faramarz Fekri,et al.  Optimal sensor selection in the presence of noise and interference , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).

[3]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Sundeep Prabhakar Chepuri,et al.  Sparse sensing for estimation with correlated observations , 2015, 2015 49th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[5]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[6]  Pieter Kruizinga,et al.  Compressive 3D ultrasound imaging using a single sensor , 2017, Science Advances.

[7]  Adrian Basarab,et al.  Frequency Domain Compressive Sampling for Ultrasound Imaging , 2012 .

[8]  R.G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing [Lecture Notes] , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  Tareq Y. Al-Naffouri,et al.  Joint sensor placement and power rating selection in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks , 2017, 2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[10]  Ting Sun,et al.  Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[11]  Haris Vikalo,et al.  Greedy sensor selection: Leveraging submodularity , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[12]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Sensor Selection via Convex Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Denis Friboulet,et al.  Pre-beamformed RF signal reconstruction in medical ultrasound using compressive sensing. , 2013, Ultrasonics.

[14]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Near-optimal Observation Selection using Submodular Functions , 2007, AAAI.

[15]  Bo Zhang,et al.  Time domain compressive beam forming of ultrasound signals. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Sundeep Prabhakar Chepuri,et al.  Sparsity-Promoting Sensor Selection for Non-Linear Measurement Models , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.