Inducible XIST-dependent X-chromosome inactivation in human somatic cells is reversible

During embryogenesis, the XIST RNA is expressed from and localizes to one X chromosome in females and induces chromosome-wide silencing. Although many changes to inactive X heterochromatin are known, the functional relationships between different modifications are not well understood, and studies of the initiation of X-inactivation have been largely confined to mouse. We now present a model system for human XIST RNA function in which induction of an XIST cDNA in somatic cells results in localized XIST RNA and transcriptional silencing. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and immunohistochemistry shows that this silencing need only be accompanied by a subset of heterochromatic marks and that these can differ between integration sites. Surprisingly, silencing is XIST-dependent, remaining reversible over extended periods. Deletion analysis demonstrates that the first exon of human XIST is sufficient for both transcript localization and the induction of silencing and that, unlike the situation in mice, the conserved repeat region is essential for both functions. In addition to providing mechanistic insights into chromosome regulation and formation of facultative heterochromatin, this work provides a tractable model system for the study of chromosome silencing and suggests key differences from mouse embryonic X-inactivation.

[1]  J. Mcneil,et al.  The X chromosome is organized into a gene-rich outer rim and an internal core containing silenced nongenic sequences , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Andrew J. Bannister,et al.  Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain , 2001, Nature.

[3]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Inheritance of a pre-inactivated paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos , 2003, Nature.

[4]  J. Rossant,et al.  Imprinted X-inactivation in extra-embryonic endoderm cell lines from mouse blastocysts , 2005, Development.

[5]  Prim B. Singh,et al.  HP1: facts, open questions, and speculation. , 2002, Journal of structural biology.

[6]  N. Benvenisty,et al.  Gene trap as a tool for genome annotation and analysis of X chromosome inactivation in human embryonic stem cells. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  M. Egholm,et al.  PNA interference mapping demonstrates functional domains in the noncoding RNA Xist , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  H. Willard,et al.  The spreading of X inactivation into autosomal material of an x;autosome translocation: evidence for a difference between autosomal and X-chromosomal DNA. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Ubiquitinated proteins including uH2A on the human and mouse inactive X chromosome: enrichment in gene rich bands , 2004, Chromosoma.

[10]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Characterization of expression at the human XIST locus in somatic, embryonal carcinoma, and transgenic cell lines. , 2003, Genomics.

[11]  B. Migeon.  X chromosome inactivation: theme and variations , 2003, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[12]  H. Willard,et al.  Barring gene expression after XIST: maintaining facultative heterochromatin on the inactive X. , 2003, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[13]  J. Lawrence,et al.  An ectopic human XIST gene can induce chromosome inactivation in postdifferentiation human HT-1080 cells , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Hematopoietic Precursor Cells Transiently Reestablish Permissiveness for XInactivation , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[15]  A. Sharp,et al.  Molecular and cytogenetic analysis of the spreading of X inactivation in X;autosome translocations. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[16]  E. Heard.  Delving into the diversity of facultative heterochromatin: the epigenetics of the inactive X chromosome. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[17]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  A shift from reversible to irreversible X inactivation is triggered during ES cell differentiation. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[18]  J. Lawrence,et al.  X‐Inactivation Status Varies in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines , 2005, Stem cells.

[19]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Unbalanced X;autosome translocations provide evidence for sequence specificity in the association of XIST RNA with chromatin. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[20]  Prim B. Singh,et al.  Histones H3/H4 form a tight complex with the inner nuclear membrane protein LBR and heterochromatin protein 1 , 2001, EMBO reports.

[21]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Long-range cis effects of ectopic X-inactivation centres on a mouse autosome , 1997, Nature.

[22]  Jian-Bing Fan,et al.  Human embryonic stem cells have a unique epigenetic signature. , 2006, Genome research.

[23]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[24]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  The human X-inactivation centre is not required for maintenance of X-chromosome inactivation , 1994, Nature.

[25]  T. Gingeras,et al.  Detection of deleted genomic DNA using a semiautomated computational analysis of GeneChip data. , 2000, Genome research.

[26]  T B Nesterova,et al.  Characterization of the genomic Xist locus in rodents reveals conservation of overall gene structure and tandem repeats but rapid evolution of unique sequence. , 2001, Genome research.

[27]  B. Migeon.  Is Tsix repression of Xist specific to mouse? , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[28]  Wolfgang A. Schulz,et al.  Hypomethylation of the XIST gene promoter in prostate cancer. , 2005, Oncology research.

[29]  E. Heard,et al.  A novel role for Xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced. , 2006, Genes & development.