CASOP: a computational approach for strain optimization aiming at high productivity.

The identification of suitable intervention strategies increasing the productivity of microorganisms is a central issue in metabolic engineering. Here, we introduce a computational framework for strain optimization based on reaction importance measures derived from weighted elementary modes. The objective is to shift the natural flux distribution to synthesis of the desired product with high production rates thereby retaining the ability of the host organism to produce biomass precursors. The stoichiometric approach allows consideration of regulatory/operational constraints and takes product yield and network capacity--the two major determinants of (specific) productivity--explicitly into account. The relative contribution of each reaction to yield and network capacity and thus productivity is estimated by analyzing the spectrum of available conversion routes (elementary modes). A result of our procedure is a reaction ranking suggesting knockout and overexpression candidates. Moreover, we show that the methodology allows for the evaluation of cofactor and co-metabolite requirements in conjunction with product synthesis. We illustrate the proposed method by studying the overproduction of succinate and lactate by Escherichia coli. The metabolic engineering strategies identified in silico resemble existing mutant strains designed for the synthesis of the respective products. Additionally, some non-intuitive intervention strategies are revealed.

[1]  Jens Nielsen,et al.  Evolutionary programming as a platform for in silico metabolic engineering , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[2]  S. Klamt,et al.  Generalized concept of minimal cut sets in biochemical networks. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[3]  D. Fell,et al.  Detection of elementary flux modes in biochemical networks: a promising tool for pathway analysis and metabolic engineering. , 1999, Trends in biotechnology.

[4]  Hyun Uk Kim,et al.  Metabolic engineering of microorganisms: general strategies and drug production. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[5]  Juan Carlos Nuño,et al.  METATOOL: for studying metabolic networks , 1999, Bioinform..

[6]  Mark A. Eiteman,et al.  pH and base counterion affect succinate production in dual-phase Escherichia coli fermentations , 2009, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[7]  F. Srienc,et al.  Elementary mode analysis: a useful metabolic pathway analysis tool for characterizing cellular metabolism , 2009, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[8]  G. Bennett,et al.  Novel pathway engineering design of the anaerobic central metabolic pathway in Escherichia coli to increase succinate yield and productivity. , 2005, Metabolic engineering.

[9]  D. Fell,et al.  Is maximization of molar yield in metabolic networks favoured by evolution? , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  S. Schuster,et al.  Metabolic network structure determines key aspects of functionality and regulation , 2002, Nature.

[11]  A. Burgard,et al.  Optknock: A bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  R. Carlson,et al.  Design, construction and performance of the most efficient biomass producing E. coli bacterium. , 2006, Metabolic engineering.

[13]  Costas D. Maranas,et al.  Maranas production systems OptStrain : A computational framework for redesign of microbial Material Supplemental , 2004 .

[14]  V. Wendisch,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum for biotechnological production of organic acids and amino acids. , 2006, Current opinion in microbiology.

[15]  C. Maranas,et al.  An optimization framework for identifying reaction activation/inhibition or elimination candidates for overproduction in microbial systems. , 2006, Metabolic engineering.

[16]  Steven J Cox,et al.  Development of a metabolic network design and optimization framework incorporating implementation constraints: a succinate production case study. , 2006, Metabolic engineering.

[17]  Xueli Zhang,et al.  Combining metabolic engineering and metabolic evolution to develop nonrecombinant strains of Escherichia coli C that produce succinate and malate , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Structural and functional analysis of cellular networks with CellNetAnalyzer , 2007, BMC Systems Biology.

[19]  Ka-Yiu San,et al.  Batch culture characterization and metabolic flux analysis of succinate-producing Escherichia coli strains. , 2006, Metabolic engineering.

[20]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Minimal cut sets in biochemical reaction networks , 2004, Bioinform..

[21]  Bernhard O Palsson,et al.  Latent Pathway Activation and Increased Pathway Capacity Enable Escherichia coli Adaptation to Loss of Key Metabolic Enzymes* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  B. Palsson,et al.  Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth , 2002, Nature.

[23]  S. Lee,et al.  Metabolic flux analysis and metabolic engineering of microorganisms. , 2008, Molecular bioSystems.

[24]  Ka-Yiu San,et al.  Metabolic engineering of aerobic succinate production systems in Escherichia coli to improve process productivity and achieve the maximum theoretical succinate yield. , 2005, Metabolic engineering.

[25]  F. Blattner,et al.  In silico design and adaptive evolution of Escherichia coli for production of lactic acid. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  F. Srienc,et al.  Hexoses and Pentoses Efficient Production of Ethanol from Cell for the Most Escherichia Coli Minimal Supplemental Material , 2022 .