Voronoi residual analysis of spatial point process models with applications to California earthquake forecasts

Many point process models have been proposed for describing and forecasting earthquake occurrences in seismically active zones such as California, but the problem of how best to compare and evaluate the goodness of fit of such models remains open. Existing techniques typically suffer from low power, especially when used for models with very volatile conditional intensities such as those used to describe earthquake clusters. This paper proposes a new residual analysis method for spatial or spatial-temporal point processes involving inspecting the differences between the modeled conditional intensity and the observed number of points over the Voronoi cells generated by the observations. The resulting residuals can be used to construct diagnostic methods of greater statistical power than residuals based on rectangular grids. Following an evaluation of performance using simulated data, the suggested method is used to compare the Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model to the Hector Mine earthquake catalog. The proposed residuals indicate that the ETAS model with uniform background rate appears to slightly but systematically underpredict seismicity along the fault and to overpredict seismicity in along the periphery of the fault.

[1]  A. Helmstetter,et al.  Adaptive Spatiotemporal Smoothing of Seismicity for Long‐Term Earthquake Forecasts in California , 2012 .

[2]  L. Meijering,et al.  INTERFACE AREA, EDGE LENGTH, AND NUMBER OF VERTICES IN CRYSTAL AGGREGATES WITH RANDOM NUCLEATION , 2014 .

[3]  Y. Kagan,et al.  High-resolution Time-independent Grid-based Forecast for M ≥ 5 Earthquakes in California , 2007 .

[4]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  Score, pseudo-score and residual diagnostics for goodness-of-fit of spatial point process models , 2010 .

[5]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Discussion article on the paper Residual analysis for spatial point processes by A. Baddeley, R. Turner, J. Moller and M. Hazelton , 2005 .

[6]  Y. Ogata Significant improvements of the space-time ETAS model for forecasting of accurate baseline seismicity , 2011 .

[7]  F. Schoenberg,et al.  Residual analysis methods for space--time point processes with applications to earthquake forecast models in California , 2011, 1202.6487.

[8]  F. Schoenberg,et al.  Point process modeling of wildfire hazard in Los Angeles County, California , 2011, 1108.0754.

[9]  David A. Rhoades,et al.  Efficient testing of earthquake forecasting models , 2011 .

[10]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Residual analysis for spatial point processes (with discussion) , 2005 .

[11]  Thordis L. Thorarinsdottir Calibration diagnostics for point process models via the probability integral transform , 2013 .

[12]  Yongtao Guan A goodness-of-fit test for inhomogeneous spatial Poisson processes , 2008 .

[13]  Frederic Paik Schoenberg,et al.  Multidimensional Residual Analysis of Point Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences , 2003 .

[14]  M. Moore,et al.  Monte carlo estimates of the distributions of the poisson voronoi tessellation , 1999 .

[15]  J. D. Zechar,et al.  Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models I: First-Order Results , 2013 .

[16]  Edward H. Field,et al.  Overview of the Working Group for the Development of Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) , 2005 .

[17]  Frederic Paik Schoenberg,et al.  Transforming Spatial Point Processes into Poisson Processes , 1999 .

[18]  Andrew B. Lawson,et al.  A Deviance Residual for Heterogeneous Spatial Poisson Processes , 1993 .

[19]  F. Schoenberg,et al.  Assessment of Point Process Models for Earthquake Forecasting , 2013, 1312.5934.

[20]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Monte carlo estimates of the distributions of the random polygons of the voronoi tessellation with respect to a poisson process , 1980 .

[21]  T. Jordan Earthquake Predictability, Brick by Brick , 2006 .

[22]  Jon E. Keeley,et al.  The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity , 2009 .

[23]  F. Massey The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[24]  M. Tanemura Statistical Distributions of Poisson Voronoi Cells in Two and Three Dimensions , 2003 .

[25]  B. Ripley The Second-Order Analysis of Stationary Point Processes , 1976 .

[26]  Daryl J. Daley,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes , 2013 .

[27]  J. D. Zechar,et al.  Likelihood-Based Tests for Evaluating Space–Rate–Magnitude Earthquake Forecasts , 2009 .

[28]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Present position and potential developments: some personal views , 1984 .

[29]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Testable Earthquake Forecasts for 1999 , 1999 .

[30]  J. Møller,et al.  Aalborg Universitet Properties of residuals for spatial point processes , 2022 .

[31]  Giada Adelfio,et al.  Point process diagnostics based on weighted second-order statistics and their asymptotic properties , 2009 .

[32]  Frederic Paik Schoenberg,et al.  Facilitated Estimation of ETAS , 2013 .

[33]  Frederic Paik Schoenberg,et al.  Evaluation of space–time point process models using super‐thinning , 2011 .

[34]  Qiang Du,et al.  Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations: Applications and Algorithms , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[35]  A. F. Smith Present Position and Potential Developments: Some Personal Views Bayesian Statistics , 1984 .

[36]  Jiancang Zhuang,et al.  Basic Models of Seismicity: Temporal Models , 2012 .

[37]  Y. Ogata Space-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences , 1998 .

[38]  Frederic Paik Schoenberg,et al.  Assessing Spatial Point Process Models Using Weighted K-functions: Analysis of California Earthquakes , 2006 .

[39]  Danijel Schorlemmer,et al.  First Results of the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models Experiment , 2010 .

[40]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Practical Maximum Pseudolikelihood for Spatial Point Patterns , 1998, Advances in Applied Probability.

[41]  S. Wiemer,et al.  Earthquake Likelihood Model Testing , 2007 .

[42]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  Score, Pseudo-Score and Residual Diagnostics for Spatial Point Process Models , 2011, 1205.3918.

[43]  B. Malamud,et al.  Characterizing wildfire regimes in the United States. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Claudia Czado,et al.  Predictive Model Assessment for Count Data , 2009, Biometrics.

[45]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Residual analysis for spatial point processes (with discussion) , 2005 .

[46]  Danijel Schorlemmer,et al.  RELM Testing Center , 2007 .

[47]  P. Meyer,et al.  Demonstration simplifiee d'un theoreme de Knight , 1971 .

[48]  F. Schoenberg,et al.  On the Voronoi estimator for the intensity of an inhomogeneous planar Poisson process , 2010 .

[49]  E. Johnson,et al.  Forest fires : behavior and ecological effects , 2001 .

[50]  Lucile M. Jones,et al.  When and where the aftershock activity was depressed: Contrasting decay patterns of the proximate large earthquakes in southern California , 2003 .