CT Imaging Techniques for Describing Motions of the Cervicothoracic Junction and Cervical Spine During Flexion, Extension, and Cervical Traction

Study Design. Computerized tomographic study of human cadavers undergoing traction and flexion-extension bending. Objectives. To investigate the feasibility of using computerized tomography techniques to quantify relative vertebral motions of the cervical spine and cervicothoracic junction (CTJ), and to define normative CTJ kinematics. Summary of Background Data. Despite developing an understanding of the mechanical behavior of the cervical spine, little remains known about the cervicothoracic junction. The CTJ is more difficult to image than other cervical regions given the anatomic features of the surrounding bones obstructing CTJ visualization. As such, limited data have been reported describing the responses of the CTJ for motions and loading in the sagittal plane, confounding the clinical assessment of its injuries and surgical treatments used at this region. Methods. Helical CT images of the cervical spine and CTJ were acquired incrementally during each of flexion, extension, and cervical traction. Vertebral surfaces were reconstructed using the specialized image analysis software, 3DVIEWNIX. A mathematical description of relative vertebral motions was derived by computing rigid transformations. Euler angles and translations were calculated. Regional spine stiffness was defined for traction. Results. The CTJ was found to be much stiffer (779 N/mm) than the cervical spine (317 N/mm) in tension. In flexion-extension bending, the CTJ was similar to the lower cervical spine. The CTJ demonstrated significantly less coupled motion than the cervical spine. Conclusions. The CTJ, as a transition region between the cervical and thoracic spines, has unique kinematic characteristics. This application of kinematic CT methods is useful for quantifying unreported normative ranges of motion for the CTJ, difficult by other conventional radiologic means.

[1]  石井 崇大 Kinematics of the Upper Cervical Spine in Rotation In Vivo Three-Dimensional Analysis , 2006 .

[2]  J. Udupa,et al.  Mechanics of the ankle and subtalar joints revealed through a 3D quasi-static stress MRI technique. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  Kinematics of the Subaxial Cervical Spine in Rotation In Vivo Three-Dimensional Analysis , 2004, Spine.

[4]  S. Yerby,et al.  Posterior Stabilization at the Cervicothoracic Junction: A Biomechanical Study , 2002, Spine.

[5]  Barry S Myers,et al.  Importance of nonlinear and multivariable flexibility coefficients in the prediction of human cervical spine motion. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Mechanical Properties of the Human Cervical Spine as Shown by Three-Dimensional Load–Displacement Curves , 2001, Spine.

[7]  E. Panacek,et al.  Distribution and patterns of blunt traumatic cervical spine injury. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 3: minor injuries. , 2001, Clinical Biomechanics.

[9]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  An in vivo analysis of the motion of the peri-talar joint complex based on MR imaging , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  S. Mercer,et al.  Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  C A Van Ee,et al.  Tensile properties of the human muscular and ligamentous cervical spine. , 2000, Stapp car crash journal.

[12]  O. Chan,et al.  Radiography versus spiral CT in the evaluation of cervicothoracic junction injuries in polytrauma patients who have undergone intubation. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[13]  T. Albert,et al.  A plate-rod device for treatment of cervicothoracic disorders: comparison of mechanical testing with established cervical spine in vitro load testing data. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[14]  Å. Nygren,et al.  Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  G. Nappi,et al.  Current methods for cervical spine movement evaluation: a review. , 2000, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[16]  S. Koskinen,et al.  Kinematic magnetic resonance imaging of the upper cervical spine using a novel positioning device. , 1999, Spine.

[17]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  A characterization of the geometric architecture of the peritalar joint complex via MRI, an aid to classification of foot type , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  K. Hayashi,et al.  Motion analysis of cervical vertebrae during whiplash loading. , 1999, Spine.

[19]  J. B. Kneeland,et al.  Analysis of in vivo 3-D internal kinematics of the joints of the foot [MRI analysis] , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  A. Ireland,et al.  Do supine oblique views provide better imaging of the cervicothoracic junction than swimmer's views? , 1998, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[21]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Whiplash Produces an S‐Shaped Curvature of the Neck With Hyperextension at Lower Levels , 1997, Spine.

[22]  J. Lotz,et al.  Instrumentation of the Cervicothoracic Junction After Destabilization , 1995, Spine.

[23]  Dewey Odhner,et al.  3DVIEWNIX: an open, transportable, multidimensional, multimodality, multiparametric imaging software system , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[24]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Cervical Human Vertebrae Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy of the Middle and Lower Regions , 1991, Spine.

[25]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Whiplash injuries and the potential for mechanical instability , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[26]  W C Hayes,et al.  Variations of stiffness and strength along the human cervical spine. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  A Breen,et al.  A digital videofluoroscopic technique for spine kinematics. , 1989, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[28]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Cervical spine motion in the sagittal plane: kinematic and geometric parameters. , 1982, Journal of Biomechanics.