A novel technique to enable experimental validation of deformable dose accumulation.

PURPOSE To propose a novel technique to experimentally validate deformable dose algorithms by measuring 3D dose distributions under the condition of deformation using deformable gel dosimeters produced by a novel gel fabrication method. METHOD Five gel dosimeters, two rigid control gels and three deformable gels, were manufactured and treated with the same conformal plan that prescribed 400 cGy to the isocenter. The control gels were treated statically; the deformable gels were treated while being compressed by an actuation device to simulate breathing motion (amplitude of compression  = 1, 1.5, and 2 cm, respectively; frequency  =  16 rpm). Comparison between the dose measured by the control gels and the corresponding static dose distribution calculated in the treatment planning system (TPS) has determined the intrinsic dose measurement uncertainty of the gel dosimeters. Doses accumulated using MORFEUS, a biomechanical model-based deformable registration and dose accumulation algorithm, were compared with the doses measured by the deformable gel dosimeters to verify the accuracy of MORFEUS using dose differences at each voxel as well as the gamma index test. Flexible plastic wraps were used to contain and protect the deformable gels from oxygen infiltration, which inhibits the gels' dose sensitizing ability. Since the wraps were imperfect oxygen barrier, dose comparison between MORFEUS and the deformable gels was performed only in the central region with a received dose of 200 cGy or above to exclude the peripheral region where oxygen penetration had likely affected dose measurements. RESULTS Dose measured with the control gels showed that the intrinsic dose measurement uncertainty of the gel dosimeters was 11.8 cGy or 4.7% compared to the TPS. The absolute mean voxel-by-voxel dose difference between the accumulated dose and the dose measured with the deformable gels was 4.7 cGy (SD = 36.0 cGy) or 1.5% (SD = 13.4%) for the three deformable gels. The absolute mean vector distance between the 250, 300, 350, and 400 cGy isodose surfaces on the accumulated and measured distributions was 1.2 mm (SD < 1.5 mm). The gamma index test that used the dose measurement precision of the control gels as the dose difference criterion and 2 mm as the distance criterion was performed, and the average pass rate of the accumulated dose distributions for all three deformable gels was 92.7%. When the distance criterion was relaxed to 3 mm, the average pass rate increased to 96.9%. CONCLUSION This study has proposed a novel technique to manufacture deformable volumetric gel dosimeters. By comparing the doses accumulated in MORFEUS and the doses measured with the dosimeters under the condition of deformation, the study has also demonstrated the potential of using deformable gel dosimetry to experimentally validate algorithms that include deformations into dose computation. Since dose less than 200 cGy was not evaluated in this study, future investigations will focus more on low dose regions by either using bigger gel dosimeters or prescribing a lower dose to provide a more complete experimental validation of MORFEUS across a wider dose range.

[1]  A Sarvazyan,et al.  Soft tissue elastometer. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  George Starkschall,et al.  Potential dosimetric benefits of four-dimensional radiation treatment planning. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  J Moseley,et al.  Contact surface and material nonlinearity modeling of human lungs , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Cumulative lung dose for several motion management strategies as a function of pretreatment patient parameters. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Improving image-guided target localization through deformable registration , 2008, Acta oncologica.

[6]  C Baldock,et al.  A basic study of some normoxic polymer gel dosimeters. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Estimation of the delivered patient dose in lung IMRT treatment based on deformable registration of 4D-CT data and Monte Carlo simulations , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  N. Merchant,et al.  Coronary venous oximetry using MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Eugene Wong,et al.  Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  H Gustavsson,et al.  Verification of dynamic radiotherapy: the potential for 3D dosimetry under respiratory-like motion using polymer gel. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  K. Brock,et al.  A magnetic resonance imaging study of prostate deformation relative to implanted gold fiducial markers. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  C De Wagter,et al.  The fundamental radiation properties of normoxic polymer gel dosimeters: a comparison between a methacrylic acid based gel and acrylamide based gels , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  C Baldock,et al.  Dose-response stability and integrity of the dose distribution of various polymer gel dosimeters. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  J L Bedford,et al.  Commissioning and quality assurance of the Pinnacle(3) radiotherapy treatment planning system for external beam photons. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  Hualiang Zhong,et al.  Monte Carlo dose mapping on deforming anatomy , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  G. Wright,et al.  T2 Accuracy on a whole‐body imager , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Respiratory correlated cone beam CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[19]  Stefano Gianolini,et al.  Introducing gel dosimetry in a clinical environment: customization of polymer gel composition and magnetic resonance imaging parameters used for 3D dose verifications in radiosurgery and intensity modulated radiotherapy. , 2007, Medical physics.

[20]  George Starkschall,et al.  Comparing the accuracy of four-dimensional photon dose calculations with three-dimensional calculations using moving and deforming phantoms. , 2009, Medical physics.

[21]  K. Brock,et al.  Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration. , 2005, Medical physics.

[22]  P J Keall,et al.  Radiological properties of normoxic polymer gel dosimeters. , 2005, Medical physics.

[23]  G. Wright,et al.  Optimized spiral imaging for measurement of myocardial T2 relaxation , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Michael Flentje,et al.  Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Targets in the Lung and Liver , 2001, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[25]  L. Sakelliou,et al.  Dose verification in clinical IMRT prostate incidents. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Randall K Ten Haken,et al.  Alterations in normal liver doses due to organ motion. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  J. Dempsey,et al.  Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method. , 2003, Medical physics.

[28]  D L McShan,et al.  Inclusion of organ deformation in dose calculations. , 2003, Medical physics.

[29]  Abbas Samani,et al.  Measuring the elastic modulus of ex vivo small tissue samples. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Do-Hoon Kim,et al.  Clinical experience using hypofractionated radiation schedules in breast cancer. , 2008, Seminars in radiation oncology.