Sequence elements critical for efficient RNA editing of a tobacco chloroplast transcript in vivo and in vitro

In tobacco chloroplast transcripts 34 nt are efficiently edited to U. No common consensus region is present around all editing sites; however, sites can be grouped in clusters that share short common sequences. Transgene transcripts carrying either the wild-type −31/+22 or −31/+60 sequence near NTrpoB C473, an editing site within tobacco rpoB transcripts, or three different mutated sequences, were all highly edited in vivo. Endogenous transcripts of rpoB, psbL and rps14, all of which contain common sequences S1, S2 and S3 5′ to NTrpoB C473, NTpsbL C2 and NTrps14 C80, were less edited in transgenic plants that over-express transcripts from NTrpoB C473 transgenes. Extent of reduction of endogenous editing differed between transgenic lines expressing mutated −31/+22 regions, depending on the abundance of the transgene transcripts. The −20/−5 sequence contains critical 5′ sequence elements. Synthetic RNA templates with alterations within this 5′ region were less efficiently edited in vitro than wild-type templates, by either tobacco or maize chloroplast extracts. The tobacco chloroplast extract supports both RNA editing and processing of 3′ transcript termini. We conclude that within the −20/−5 region, sequences common to editing sites in the transcripts of rpoB, psbL and rps14 are critical for efficient NTrpoB C473 editing.

[1]  M. W. Gray,et al.  RNA editing in plant mitochondria and chloroplasts , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[2]  P. Maliga,et al.  High-frequency plastid transformation in tobacco by selection for a chimeric aadA gene. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R. Bock,et al.  Transfer of plastid RNA-editing activity to novel sites suggests a critical role for spacing in editing-site recognition. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Hanson,et al.  A single alteration 20 nt 5' to an editing target inhibits chloroplast RNA editing in vivo. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  T. G. Owens,et al.  Expression of complementary RNA from chloroplast transgenes affects editing efficiency of transgene and endogenous chloroplast transcripts , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  M. Hanson,et al.  A guide to RNA editing. , 1997, RNA.

[7]  P. Covello,et al.  On the evolution of RNA editing. , 1993, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[8]  Hiro Iguchi,et al.  Chloroplast RNA Editing Required for Functional Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase in Plants* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  A. Brennicke,et al.  RNA editing in Arabidopsis mitochondria effects 441 C to U changes in ORFs. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. Farré,et al.  Different patterns in the recognition of editing sites in plant mitochondria. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  M. Sugiura,et al.  Involvement of a site‐specific trans‐acting factor and a common RNA‐binding protein in the editing of chloroplast mRNAs: development of a chloroplast in vitro RNA editing system , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[12]  Junichi Obokata,et al.  A site-specific factor interacts directly with its cognate RNA editing site in chloroplast transcripts , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Y. Notsu,et al.  The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) mitochondrial genome: frequent DNA sequence acquisition and loss during the evolution of flowering plants , 2002, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[14]  M. Sugiura,et al.  Comparative Analysis of RNA Editing Sites in Higher Plant Chloroplasts , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[15]  A. Brennicke,et al.  RNA editing sites in plant mitochondria can share cis‐elements , 2006, FEBS letters.

[16]  R. Herrmann,et al.  The plastid chromosome of Atropa belladonna and its comparison with that of Nicotiana tabacum: the role of RNA editing in generating divergence in the process of plant speciation. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  P. Maliga,et al.  Efficient targeting of foreign genes into the tobacco plastid genome. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  H. Carrer,et al.  Site‐specific factor involved in the editing of the psbL mRNA in tobacco plastids. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[19]  M. Sugiura,et al.  Recognition of RNA Editing Sites Is Directed by Unique Proteins in Chloroplasts: Biochemical Identification of cis-Acting Elements and trans-Acting Factors Involved in RNA Editing in Tobacco and Pea Chloroplasts , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[20]  E. Babiychuk,et al.  Pigment Deficiency in Nightshade/Tobacco Cybrids Is Caused by the Failure to Edit the Plastid ATPase α-Subunit mRNAw⃞ , 2005, The Plant Cell Online.

[21]  J. Nickelsen,et al.  RNA-protein interactions at transcript 3′ ends and evidence for trnK-psbA cotranscription in mustard chloroplasts , 1991, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[22]  M. Hanson,et al.  Substrate and cofactor requirements for RNA editing of chloroplast transcripts in Arabidopsis in vitro. , 2005, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[23]  F. Zito,et al.  Mutations of cytochrome b6 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii disclose the functional significance for a proline to leucine conversion by petB editing in maize and tobacco , 2004, Plant Molecular Biology.

[24]  G. Link,et al.  The 54 kDa RNA-binding protein from mustard chloroplasts mediates endonucleolytic transcript 3' end formation in vitro. , 1993, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[25]  R. Bock,et al.  Introduction of a heterologous editing site into the tobacco plastid genome: the lack of RNA editing leads to a mutant phenotype. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[26]  A. Brennicke,et al.  In Vitro RNA Editing in Pea Mitochondria Requires NTP or dNTP, Suggesting Involvement of an RNA Helicase* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  Maureen R. Hanson,et al.  Cross-Competition in Transgenic Chloroplasts Expressing Single Editing Sites Reveals Shared cis Elements , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  M. Hanson,et al.  Edited transcripts compete with unedited mRNAs for trans-acting editing factors in higher plant chloroplasts. , 2001, Gene.

[29]  G. Link,et al.  Structure and expression of a split chloroplast gene from mustard (Sinapis alba): ribosomal protein gene rps16 reveals unusual transcriptional features and complex RNA maturation , 2004, Current Genetics.

[30]  M. Hanson,et al.  Developmental co-variation of RNA editing extent of plastid editing sites exhibiting similar cis-elements. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  A. Brennicke,et al.  An in vitro RNA editing system from cauliflower mitochondria: editing site recognition parameters can vary in different plant species. , 2005, RNA.

[32]  M. Hanson,et al.  A heterologous maize rpoB editing site is recognized by transgenic tobacco chloroplasts , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[33]  M. Hanson,et al.  Transcript abundance supercedes editing efficiency as a factor in developmental variation of chloroplast gene expression. , 2002, RNA.

[34]  R. Mulligan,et al.  Nucleotide specificity of the RNA editing reaction in pea chloroplasts. , 2005, Journal of plant physiology.