Knowledge Transfer through Congenital Learning: Spin-Out Generation, Growth and Survival

This paper examines the role of knowledge as a driver of an organization's formation, and as a subsequent source of its competitive advantage. We investigate the parent-progeny knowledge transfer relationship, and the impact of this congenital learning on the evolution and performance of a spin-out (an entrepreneurial venture by an ex-employee). Using data from the disk drive industry, we show that incumbent knowledge capabilities, related to technology and market pioneering, predict spin-out formation. Parent's capabilities at the time of spin-out founding positively affect spin-out knowledge capabilities, and result in spin-outs having higher probabilities of survival relative to other entrants.

[1]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[2]  David J. Teece,et al.  Capturing Value from Technological Innovation: Integration, Strategic Partnering, and Licensing Decisions , 1988 .

[3]  G. Day.  The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[4]  Henry Chesbrough.  Arrested Development: The Experience of European Hard Disk Drive Firms in Comparison with Us and Japanese Firms , 1999 .

[5]  R. Deshpandé,et al.  Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the Research Agenda , 1989 .

[6]  Vance H. Fried,et al.  Toward a Model of Venture Capital Investment Decision Making , 1994 .

[7]  Allen M. Weiss,et al.  Marketing in Technology-Intensive Markets: Toward a Conceptual Framework , 1999 .

[8]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[9]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[10]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality , 1991 .

[11]  C. Fornell,et al.  Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages in Consumer Goods Industries , 1985 .

[12]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Contingency Value of Complementary Capabilities in Product Development , 1999 .

[13]  S. Shane.  Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[14]  Russell M. Knight,et al.  Technological innovation in Canada: A comparison of independent entrepreneurs and corporate innovators , 1989 .

[15]  P. Bierly,et al.  Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[16]  Andrew D. Henderson,et al.  Firm Strategy and Age Dependence: A Contingent View of the Liabilities of Newness, Adolescence, and Obsolescence , 1999 .

[17]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[18]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[19]  K. Seltman.  Marketing for management. , 2004, Marketing health services.

[20]  P. Allison.  Survival analysis using the SAS system : a practical guide , 1995 .

[21]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[22]  Arthur L. Stinchcombe,et al.  Interorganizational Relations and Careers in Computer Software Firms , 1988 .

[23]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[24]  R. Coff.  Human Assets and Management Dilemmas: Coping With Hazards On the Road to Resource-Based Theory , 1997 .

[25]  S. Klepper,et al.  Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations , 1982 .

[26]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Managing Culture as a Competitive Resource: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[27]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[28]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Duynamics of Interorganizational Attachments: Auditor-Client Relationships , 1988 .

[29]  Jérôme Doutriaux,et al.  Emerging high-tech firms: How durable are their comparative start-up advantages?☆ , 1992 .

[30]  Joachim Schwalbach,et al.  Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison , 1991 .

[31]  Birgit Benkhoff.  A test of the HRM model: good for employers and employees , 1997 .

[32]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  OPPORTUNITY AND CONSTRAINT: ORGANIZATIONS’ LEARNING FROM THE OPERATING AND COMPETITIVE EXPERIENCE OF INDUSTRIES , 1997 .

[33]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Order of Market Entry: Established Empirical Generalizations, Emerging Empirical Generalizations, and Future Research , 1995 .

[34]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965 , 1996 .

[35]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[36]  M. Schulz.  THE UNCERTAIN RELEVANCE OF NEWNESS: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE FLOWS , 2001 .

[37]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF NEW ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS , 1991 .

[38]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Speeding Products to Market: Waiting Time to First Product Introduction in New Firms. , 1990 .

[39]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Information, market imperfections and strategy , 1993 .

[40]  A. Kirkman.  Ties That Bind , 2001, Journal of lesbian studies.

[41]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications , 1990 .

[42]  Åsa Lindholm Dahlstrand,et al.  Growth and inventiveness in technology-based spin-off firms , 1997 .

[43]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[44]  C. Hilsum,et al.  Revolution in Miniature , 1979 .

[45]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[46]  Sherwin Rosen,et al.  Learning and Experience in the Labor Market , 1972 .

[47]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[48]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[49]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[50]  David A. Garvin,et al.  Spin-offs and the New Firm Formation Process , 1983 .

[51]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link , 1990 .

[52]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[53]  G. Tellis,et al.  Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend? , 1993 .

[54]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[55]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[56]  W. Boeker.  Executive Migration and Strategic Change: The Effect of Top Manager Movement on Product-Market Entry , 1997 .

[57]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality , 1992 .

[58]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries , 1998 .

[59]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[60]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[61]  U. Zander.  Exploiting a technical edge : voluntary and involuntary dissemination of technology , 1991 .

[62]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[63]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[64]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[65]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  Person, Process, Choice: The Psychology of New Venture Creation , 1992 .

[66]  April Franco,et al.  Knowledge Diffusion through Employee Mobility , 2000 .

[67]  R. Kellogg,et al.  RUNNING HEAD : AFFILIATIONS , ENDORSEMENTS , AND IPO SUCCESS GETTING OFF TO A GOOD START : THE EFFECTS OF UPPER ECHELON AFFILIATIONS ON INTERORGANIZATIONAL ENDORSEMENTS AND IPO SUCCESS , 2002 .

[68]  Stanley F. Slater,et al.  Developing a customer value-based theory of the firm , 1997 .

[69]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[70]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[71]  Hubert Gatignon,et al.  Order of Entry as a Moderator of the Effect of the Marketing Mix on Market Share , 1996 .

[72]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[73]  Monica C. Higgins,et al.  Getting Off to a Good Start: The Effects of Upper Echelon Affiliations on Interorganizational Endorsements , 2003 .

[74]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[75]  Mark Simon,et al.  Corporate versus independent new ventures: Resource, strategy, and performance differences , 1997 .

[76]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Marketing's Role in the Implementation of Business Strategies: A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework , 1987 .

[77]  S. Venkataraman,et al.  The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor''s perspective , 1997 .

[78]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Where do organizational forms come from? , 1985 .

[79]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Environments of Organizations , 1976 .

[80]  S. Winter.  On Coase, Competence, and the Corporation , 1988 .

[81]  J. Lerner.  An Empirical Exploration of a Technology Race , 1997 .

[82]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Rigid Disk Drive Industry: A History of Commercial and Technological Turbulence , 1993, Business History Review.

[83]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[84]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[85]  J. Allen.  Private Information and Spin-Off Performance , 2001 .

[86]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[87]  M. Lambkin.  Order of entry and performance in new markets , 1988 .

[88]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .