Data-driven model comparing the effects of glial scarring and interface interactions on chronic neural recordings in non-human primates

OBJECTIVE We characterized electrode stability over twelve weeks of impedance and neural recording data from four chronically-implanted Utah arrays in two rhesus macaques, and investigated the effects of glial scarring and interface interactions at the electrode recording site on signal quality using a computational model. APPROACH A finite-element model of a Utah array microelectrode in neural tissue was coupled with a multi-compartmental model of a neuron to quantify the effects of encapsulation thickness, encapsulation resistivity, and interface resistivity on electrode impedance and waveform amplitude. The coupled model was then reconciled with the in vivo data. Histology was obtained seventeen weeks post-implantation to measure gliosis. MAIN RESULTS From week 1-3, mean impedance and amplitude increased at rates of 115.8 kΩ/week and 23.1 μV/week, respectively. This initial ramp up in impedance and amplitude was observed across all arrays, and is consistent with biofouling (increasing interface resistivity) and edema clearing (increasing tissue resistivity), respectively, in the model. Beyond week 3, the trends leveled out. Histology showed that thin scars formed around the electrodes. In the model, scarring could not match the in vivo data. However, a thin interface layer at the electrode tip could. Despite having a large effect on impedance, interface resistivity did not have a noticeable effect on amplitude. SIGNIFICANCE This study suggests that scarring does not cause an electrical problem with regard to signal quality since it does not appear to be the main contributor to increasing impedance or significantly affect amplitude unless it displaces neurons. This, in turn, suggests that neural signals can be obtained reliably despite scarring as long as the recording site has sufficiently low impedance after accumulating a thin layer of biofouling. Therefore, advancements in microelectrode technology may be expedited by focusing on improvements to the recording site-tissue interface rather than elimination of the glial scar.

[1]  S S Stensaas,et al.  The reaction of the cerebral cortex to chronically implanted plastic needles. , 1976, Acta neuropathologica.

[2]  D. Kipke,et al.  Repeated voltage biasing improves unit recordings by reducing resistive tissue impedances , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[4]  D. Edell,et al.  Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Nicholas Hatsopoulos,et al.  Decoding continuous and discrete motor behaviors using motor and premotor cortical ensembles. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  David C. Martin,et al.  Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays , 2005, Experimental Neurology.

[7]  Kevin J. Otto,et al.  Effects of adsorbed proteins, an antifouling agent and long-duration DC voltage pulses on the impedance of silicon-based neural microelectrodes , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  Daryl R. Kipke,et al.  Voltage pulses change neural interface properties and improve unit recordings with chronically implanted microelectrodes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Christof Koch,et al.  Electrical Interactions via the Extracellular Potential Near Cell Bodies , 1999, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[10]  Justin C. Williams,et al.  Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  N. Logothetis,et al.  In Vivo Measurement of Cortical Impedance Spectrum in Monkeys: Implications for Signal Propagation , 2007, Neuron.

[12]  C. Bédard,et al.  Modeling extracellular field potentials and the frequency-filtering properties of extracellular space. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Review of signal distortion through metal microelectrode recording circuits and filters , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Cerebral Astrocyte Response to Micromachined Silicon Implants , 1999, Experimental Neurology.

[15]  J.P. Donoghue,et al.  Reliability of signals from a chronically implanted, silicon-based electrode array in non-human primate primary motor cortex , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Failure mode analysis of silicon-based intracortical microelectrode arrays in non-human primates , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  David C. Martin,et al.  In vivo studies of polypyrrole/peptide coated neural probes. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[18]  W. Grill,et al.  Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[20]  P. Tresco,et al.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  A model of spike initiation in neocortical pyramidal neurons , 1995, Neuron.

[22]  Michael W. Reimann,et al.  A Biophysically Detailed Model of Neocortical Local Field Potentials Predicts the Critical Role of Active Membrane Currents , 2013, Neuron.

[23]  H Kalvøy,et al.  A finite element model of needle electrode spatial sensitivity , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[24]  Rajmohan Bhandari,et al.  Long-term reliability of Al2O3 and Parylene C bilayer encapsulated Utah electrode array based neural interfaces for chronic implantation , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  Scott F. Lempka,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of the Local Field Potential in Deep Brain Stimulation Applications , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  Kevin J. Otto,et al.  Resistive and reactive changes to the impedance of intracortical microelectrodes can be mitigated with polyethylene glycol under acute in vitro and in vivo settings , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[27]  Nigel H Lovell,et al.  Substrate dependent stability of conducting polymer coatings on medical electrodes. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[28]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices , 2003, Brain Research.

[29]  Steven M Chase,et al.  Control of a brain–computer interface without spike sorting , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[30]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Seven Years of Recording from Monkey Cortex with a Chronically Implanted Multiple Microelectrode , 2010, Front. Neuroeng..

[31]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Intracellular features predicted by extracellular recordings in the hippocampus in vivo. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Vikash Gilja,et al.  Long-term Stability of Neural Prosthetic Control Signals from Silicon Cortical Arrays in Rhesus Macaque Motor Cortex , 2010 .

[33]  Justin C. Sanchez,et al.  Abiotic-biotic characterization of Pt/Ir microelectrode arrays in chronic implants , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[34]  David J. Ewins,et al.  Protein adsorption on materials for recording sites on implantable microelectrodes , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[35]  D. Kipke,et al.  Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. , 1999, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[36]  Henrik Jörntell,et al.  Implant Size and Fixation Mode Strongly Influence Tissue Reactions in the CNS , 2011, PloS one.

[37]  Victor Krauthamer,et al.  Rapid evaluation of the durability of cortical neural implants using accelerated aging with reactive oxygen species , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[38]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of the Current-Density and Electric Field Generated by Metal Microelectrodes , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  J. Haueisen,et al.  The Influence of Brain Tissue Anisotropy on Human EEG and MEG , 2002, NeuroImage.

[40]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Neural control of cursor trajectory and click by a human with tetraplegia 1000 days after implant of an intracortical microelectrode array , 2011 .

[41]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[42]  Daryl R. Kipke,et al.  Flavopiridol reduces the impedance of neural prostheses in vivo without affecting recording quality , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[43]  Justin C. Sanchez,et al.  Quantifying long-term microelectrode array functionality using chronic in vivo impedance testing , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[44]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Theoretical analysis of intracortical microelectrode recordings , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[45]  Craig T. Nordhausen,et al.  Single unit recording capabilities of a 100 microelectrode array , 1996, Brain Research.

[46]  M. Moffitt,et al.  Model-based analysis of cortical recording with silicon microelectrodes , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[47]  Wei Wang,et al.  Collaborative Approach in the Development of High‐Performance Brain–Computer Interfaces for a Neuroprosthetic Arm: Translation from Animal Models to Human Control , 2014, Clinical and translational science.

[48]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Incorporation of the electrode–electrolyte interface into finite-element models of metal microelectrodes , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[49]  Pascal Mailley,et al.  A New 3-D Finite-Element Model Based on Thin-Film Approximation for Microelectrode Array Recording of Extracellular Action Potential , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.