Investigation of advanced counterrotation blade configuration concepts for high speed turboprop systems. Task 5: Unsteady counterrotation ducted propfan analysis. Computer program user's manual

The primary objective of this study was the development of a time-marching three-dimensional Euler/Navier-Stokes aerodynamic analysis to predict steady and unsteady compressible transonic flows about ducted and unducted propfan propulsion systems employing multiple blade rows. The computer codes resulting from this study are referred to as ADPAC-AOACR (Advanced Ducted Propfan Analysis Codes-Angle of Attack Coupled Row). This report is intended to serve as a computer program user's manual for the ADPAC-AOACR codes developed under Task 5 of NASA Contract NAS3-25270, Unsteady Counterrotating Ducted Propfan Analysis. The ADPAC-AOACR program is based on a flexible multiple blocked grid discretization scheme permitting coupled 2-D/3-D mesh block solutions with application to a wide variety of geometries. For convenience, several standard mesh block structures are described for turbomachinery applications. Aerodynamic calculations are based on a four-stage Runge-Kutta time-marching finite volume solution technique with added numerical dissipation. Steady flow predictions are accelerated by a multigrid procedure. Numerical calculations are compared with experimental data for several test cases to demonstrate the utility of this approach for predicting the aerodynamics of modern turbomachinery configurations employing multiple blade rows.

[1]  Yuichi Matsuo,et al.  Predicted flow field around the advanced propeller at take-off , 1988 .

[2]  Mark L. Celestina,et al.  A Numerical Simulation of the Inviscid Flow Through a Counterrotating Propeller , 1986 .

[3]  Edward J. Hall,et al.  3D Euler analysis of ducted propfan flowfields , 1990 .

[4]  L. J. Bober,et al.  Euler Analysis of Transonic Propeller Flows , 1987 .

[5]  W. N. Dawes,et al.  A Comparison of the Measured and Predicted Flow Field in a Modern Fan-Bypass Configuration , 1993 .

[6]  H. Wainauski,et al.  Aerodynamic performance of a counter rotating Prop-Fan , 1986 .

[7]  J. Sullivan,et al.  A comparison of numerical simulation and experimental measurements of flow through propellers , 1988 .

[8]  William N. Dawes Multi-Blade Row Navier-Stokes Simulations of Fan-Bypass Configurations , 1991 .

[9]  Rodrick V. Chima,et al.  An unconditionally stable Runge-Kutta method for unsteady flows , 1989 .

[10]  David L. Whitfield,et al.  Three-dimensional unsteady Euler solutions for propfans and counter-rotating propfans in transonic flow , 1987 .

[11]  Luigi Martinelli,et al.  Calculations of viscous flows with a multigrid method , 1987 .

[12]  André Pierre Saxer,et al.  A numerical analysis of 3-D inviscid stator/rotor interactions using non-reflecting boundary conditions , 1992 .

[13]  Chuichi Arakawa,et al.  Navier-Stokes computations for flowfield of an advanced turboprop , 1988 .

[14]  R. V. Chima,et al.  Inviscid and viscous flows in cascades with an explicit multiple-grid algorithm , 1985 .

[15]  R. A. Delaney,et al.  Viscous Analysis of Three-Dimensional Turbomachinery Flows on Body Conforming Grids Using an Implicit Solver , 1991 .

[16]  Makoto Kobayakawa Flow field around a propeller by Navier-Stokes equation analysis , 1988 .