Comparison of the wet and dry fatigue properties of all ceramic crowns

The purpose of this paper was to investigate the influence of fatigue on the fracture strength of In ceram, optimal pressable ceramic (OPCTM) and IPS Empress in both wet and dry environments. Twenty-six crown shapes 8 mm in diameter and 8.5 mm in height were fabricated for each ceramic system. For each ceramic system, ten specimens were tested for fracture strength without fatiguing. The second group was submitted to a fatigue and fracture test in a dry (eight specimens) and a third group in a wet (eight specimens) environment using an Instron testing machine. The results were statistically analysed using a Mann–Whitney test. The results indicated that: (i) the fracture strength for In ceram was significantly stronger than OPCTM and IPS Empress (p<0.05) – no difference was found between OPCTM and IPS Empress; (ii) fatiguing and fracture testing showed a significant decrease in the fracture strength for In ceram and IPS Empress in the wet environment and no difference was found in the dry environment – no difference was found for OPCTM; and (iii) when fatigued in a dry environment, In ceram crown shapes were significantly stronger than OPCTM and IPS Empress (p<0.05) – the same statistical differences were found when fatigued in a wet environment.

[1]  V Piddock,et al.  In vitro comparison of conventional crowns and a new all-ceramic system. , 1993, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  W. G. Richards,et al.  Metallurgy and plastics for engineers: by Merle C. Nutt, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1977. ISBN 0-08-021684-6, 250 X 176 mm, xv + 550 pages, 396 illus., hard cover £12.50 , 1980 .

[3]  H. Knode,et al.  [Strength of the In-Ceram system under mechanical loads and thermocycling in artificial saliva]. , 1991, Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift.

[4]  S. Campbell,et al.  A comparative strength study of metal ceramic and all-ceramic esthetic materials: modulus of rupture. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  C. E. Brukl,et al.  Compressive strengths of conventional, twin foil, and all-ceramic crowns. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  J. W. Ergle,et al.  Fatigue characteristics of a high-strength porcelain. , 1994, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[7]  W. Ledoux,et al.  A Bond Strength Study of Luted Castable Ceramic Restorations , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[8]  G. Øilo Adaption of luting cement to enamel, dentin and restorative material. , 1978 .

[9]  E. S. Smyd The role of torque, torsion, and bending in prosthodontic failures , 1961 .

[10]  C. A. Sherrill,et al.  Transverse Strength of Aluminous and Feldspathic Porcelain , 1974 .

[11]  C J Goodacre,et al.  The effect of tooth preparation design on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns: 3. , 1990, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[12]  H. T. Shillingburg,et al.  Effect of luting media on the compressive strengths of two types of all-ceramic crown. , 1993, Quintessence International.

[13]  W. Douglas,et al.  Corrosion-fatigue of the bond between nickel-chrome casting alloys and porcelain. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.