Social informatics: Perspectives, examples, and trends

Les AA. definissent ce qu'est l'informatique sociale et passent en revue la litterature recente sur le sujet, les tendances actuelles et emergentes, les opportunites et les questions encore non explorees, notamment pour l'enseignement et la pratique professionnelle. L'importance du contexte social et le pluralisme methodologique sont les deux principes de l'informatique sociale. Les resultats communs issus de la recherche concernent les effets paradoxaux de l'utilisation des technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC) ; comment l'utilisation des TIC avantage certains groupes plus que d'autres et les consequences ethiques et morales de ces differences ; la relation reciproque entre la conception, l'implementation, l'utilisation des TIC et le contexte dans lequel cela se produit.

[1]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[2]  Rob Kling,et al.  Learning About Information Technologies and Social Change: The Contribution of Social Informatics , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[3]  Michael D. McNeese,et al.  Augmenting group sense making in ill-defined, emerging situations: Experiences, lessons learned and issues for future development , 1997, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[6]  Nicholas Argyres,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Coordination: Evidence From the B-2 , 1999 .

[7]  P D Chatzoglou.  Use of methodologies: an empirical analysis of their impact on the economics of the development process , 1997 .

[8]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use , 2000, MIS Q..

[9]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Supporting Articulation Work , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[10]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[11]  Rob Kling,et al.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[12]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Socio-technical Design: An Unfulfilled Promise or a Future Opportunity , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[13]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Teledemocracy in local government , 1999, CACM.

[14]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  The Merchant of Prato - Revisited: Toward a Third Rationality of Information Systems , 1998, MIS Q..

[15]  Elfreda A. Chatman,et al.  The impoverished life‐world of outsiders , 1996 .

[16]  M. Angela Sasse,et al.  Users are not the enemy , 1999, CACM.

[17]  Valerie Frissen.  ICTs in the Rush Hour of Life , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[18]  Sanna Talja,et al.  The production of context in information seeking research: a metatheoretical view , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[19]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  The distribution of computing: the knowledge markets of distributed technical support specialists , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.

[20]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  IT and changing professional identity: micro-studies and macro-theory , 1998 .

[21]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[22]  Chris Halonen,et al.  Collaboration and conflict in the development of a computerized dispatch facility , 1998 .

[23]  Leyland Pitt,et al.  The Impact of Individual and Organizational Factors on Problem Perception: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the Marketing-Technical Dyad , 1998 .

[24]  Matthew Jones,et al.  The Moving Finger: The Use of Social Theory in WG 8.2 Conference Papers, 1975-1999 , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[25]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not Just a Matter of Time: Field Differences and the Shaping of Electronic Media , 1999 .

[26]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Log on education: K-12 and the Internet , 2000, CACM.

[27]  Ann Curry,et al.  Connecting to the Internet: The Challenge for Canada's County and Regional Libraries , 2000 .

[28]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Mis problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective , 1977 .

[29]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[30]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  MIS Problems and failures: a sociotechnical perspective part I: the cause , 1977 .

[31]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[32]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Group Dynamics Meet Cognition: Combining Socio-Technical Concepts and Usability Engineering in the Design of Information Systems , 2000 .

[33]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Electronic Trading and Work Transformation in the London Insurance Market , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization , 1982, Adv. Comput..

[35]  E. Chatman.  A theory of life in the round , 1999 .

[36]  D. Ellis,et al.  Information science and information systems: conjuct subjects disjunct disciplines , 1999 .

[37]  Lisa Covi,et al.  Material Mastery: Situating Digital Library Use in University Research Practices , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[38]  David Robins,et al.  Network organizational development in the public sector: a case study of the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) , 2000 .

[39]  Scott C. Forbes,et al.  Identifying Temporary and Permanent Gaps in Universal Service , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[40]  A. Abbott.  Sequence analysis: new methods for old ideas , 1995 .

[41]  Stana B. Martin.  Information technology, employment, and the information sector: trends in information employment 1970–1995 , 1998 .

[42]  Paul F. Marty.  On-line exhibit design: the sociotechnological impact of building a museum over the World Wide Web , 2000 .

[43]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau.  Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. , 1991 .

[44]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The use of systems development methodologies in practice: a field study , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[45]  Wanda J. Orlikowski.  Learning from Notes: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation , 1993, Inf. Soc..

[46]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communities, A Comparative Analysis , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[48]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Social Informatics in the Information Sciences: Current Activities and Emerging Directions , 2000, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[49]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[50]  Eleanor Herasimchuk Wynn,et al.  Office conversation as an information medium , 1979 .

[51]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Coping with contradictions in business process re-engineering , 1996, Inf. Technol. People.

[52]  Paul Attewell,et al.  Home Computers and School Performance , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[53]  C. Davies,et al.  Organizational Influences on the University Electronic Library , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[54]  Kai R. T. Larsen,et al.  Voting technology implementation , 1999, CACM.

[55]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Growing systems in emergent organizations , 1999, CACM.

[56]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Transforming Work Through Information Technology: A Comparative Case Study of Geographic Information Systems in County Government , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Introduction to This Special Issue on New Agendas for Human-Computer Interaction , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[58]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[59]  K. Pettigrew,et al.  The Use of Theory in Information Science Research. , 2001 .