On the Optimal Duration of Spectrum Leases in Exclusive License Markets With Stochastic Demand

This paper addresses the following question which is of interest in designing efficient exclusive-use spectrum licenses sold through spectrum auctions. Given a system model in which customer demand, revenue, and bids of wireless operators are characterized by stochastic processes and an operator is interested in joining the market only if its expected revenue is above a threshold and the lease duration is below a threshold, what is the optimal lease duration which maximizes the net customer demand served by the wireless operators? Increasing or decreasing lease duration has many competing effects; while shorter lease duration may increase the efficiency of spectrum allocation, longer lease duration may increase market competition by incentivizing more operators to enter the market. We formulate this problem as a two-stage Stackelberg game consisting of the regulator and the wireless operators and design efficient algorithms to find the Stackelberg equilibrium of the entire game. These algorithms can also be used to find the Stackelberg equilibrium under some generalizations of our model. Using these algorithms, we obtain important numerical results and insights that characterize how the optimal lease duration varies with respect to market parameters in order to maximize the spectrum utilization. A few of our numerical results are non-intuitive as they suggest that increasing market competition may not necessarily improve spectrum utilization. To the best of our knowledge, this paper presents the first mathematical approach to optimize the lease duration of spectrum licenses.

[1]  Harald Gruber Spectrum Limits and Competition in Mobile Markets: The Role of Licence Fees , 2000 .

[2]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[3]  François Jeanjean,et al.  The Impact of License Duration on Tangible Investments of Mobile Operators , 2018, Telecommunications Policy.

[4]  Robert Wilson,et al.  Optimal Contract Period for Priority Service , 1990, Oper. Res..

[5]  Xia Zhou,et al.  eBay in the Sky: strategy-proof wireless spectrum auctions , 2008, MobiCom '08.

[6]  Umberto Spagnolini,et al.  Spectrum Leasing to Cooperating Secondary Ad Hoc Networks , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Timothy X. Brown,et al.  The dynamic policy license , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[8]  Huynh Trung Luong,et al.  Measure of bullwhip effect in supply chains with autoregressive demand process , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Yunfei Chen,et al.  A Survey of Measurement-Based Spectrum Occupancy Modeling for Cognitive Radios , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  I-Jeng Wang,et al.  Characterization of Spectrum Activities in the U.S. Public Safety Band for Opportunistic Spectrum Access , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[11]  Chonho Lee,et al.  Auction Approaches for Resource Allocation in Wireless Systems: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  P. A. Blight The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction , 1991 .

[13]  Bala Srinivasan,et al.  Exclusive Use Spectrum Access Trading Models in Cognitive Radio Networks: A Survey , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[14]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Sharpe ratio based pricing of Cognitive Radio access , 2011, 2011 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[15]  XiaoHua Xu,et al.  TODA: Truthful Online Double Auction for Spectrum Allocation in Wireless Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN).

[16]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  Toward Practical Spectrum Permits , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking.

[17]  Raymond Y. C. Tse Lag vacancy, effective rents and optimal lease term , 1999 .

[18]  Alhussein A. Abouzeid,et al.  Optimal Duration of Spectrum Lease: A Mathematical Approach , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[19]  Fan Wu,et al.  A Strategy-Proof Radio Spectrum Auction Mechanism in Noncooperative Wireless Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[20]  Joarder Kamruzzaman,et al.  Reputation and User Requirement Based Price Modeling for Dynamic Spectrum Access , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[21]  Alexander Mackay,et al.  The Structure of Costs and the Duration of Supplier Relationships ∗ , 2016 .

[22]  J. Kiefer,et al.  Sequential minimax search for a maximum , 1953 .

[23]  Nicholas Kalouptsidis,et al.  Marginal value-based pricing of additional spectrum assigned to cellular telephony operators , 2002, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[24]  Qian Zhang,et al.  FlexAuc: Serving Dynamic Demands in a Spectrum Trading Market With Flexible Auction , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[25]  Hai Jiang,et al.  Dynamic Spectrum Leasing With Two Sellers , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[26]  Dan McCloskey,et al.  Chicago spectrum occupancy measurements & analysis and a long-term studies proposal , 2006, TAPAS '06.

[27]  Alia Asheralieva,et al.  Prediction based bandwidth allocation for cognitive LTE network , 2013, 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[28]  Chang Liu,et al.  Competition with licensed shared spectrum , 2014, 2014 48th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS).

[29]  Hidekazu Murata,et al.  Joint Dynamics of Spectrum Allocation and User Behavior in Spectrum Markets , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.