Results of the first air ion spectrometer calibration and intercomparison workshop

Abstract. The Air Ion Spectrometer (AIS) measures mobility and size distributions of atmospheric ions. The Neutral cluster and Air Ion Spectrometer (NAIS) can additionally measure neutral particles. The number of the (N)AIS instruments in the world is only 11. Nevertheless, they are already widely used in atmospheric ion studies, particularly related to the initial steps of new particle formation. There is no standard method applicable for calibrating the ion spectrometers in the sub-3 nm ion range. However, recent development of high resolution DMAs has enabled the size separation of small ions with good mobility resolution. For the first time, the ion spectrometers were intercompared and calibrated in a workshop, held in January–February 2008 in Helsinki, Finland. The overall goal was to experimentally determine the (N)AIS transfer functions. Monomobile mobility standards, 241-Am charger ions and silver particles were generated and used as calibration aerosols. High resolution DMAs were used to size-separate the smaller (1–10 nm) ions, while at bigger diameters (4–40 nm) the size was selected with a HAUKE-type DMA. Negative ion mobilities were detected by (N)AISs with slightly better accuracy than positive, nonetheless, both were somewhat overestimated. A linear fit of slope of one to the whole dataset of mobilities suggested that (N)AISs measured the negative mobilities 1.36±0.16 times larger compared with the reference instruments. Similarly, positive mobilities were measured 1.39±0.15 times larger compared with the reference instruments. The completely monomobile mobility standards were measured with the best accuracy. The (N)AIS concentrations were compared with an aerosol electrometer (AE) and a condensation particle counter (CPC). At sizes below 1.5 nm (positive) and 3 nm (negative) the ion spectrometers detected higher concentrations while at bigger sizes they showed similar concentrations as the reference instruments. The total particle concentrations measured by the NAISs were within ±50% of the reference CPC concentration at 4–40 nm sizes. The lowest cut-off size of the NAIS in neutral particle measurements was determined to be between 1.5 and 3 nm, depending on the measurement conditions and the polarity.

[1]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Basic characteristics of atmospheric particles, trace gases and meteorology in a relatively clean Southern African Savannah environment , 2008 .

[2]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Heterogeneous Nucleation Experiments Bridging the Scale from Molecular Ion Clusters to Nanoparticles , 2008, Science.

[3]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Toward Direct Measurement of Atmospheric Nucleation , 2007, Science.

[4]  H. Tammet.  Continuous scanning of the mobility and size distribution of charged clusters and nanometer particles in atmospheric air and the Balanced Scanning Mobility Analyzer BSMA , 2006 .

[5]  A. Venäläinen,et al.  Scavenging of ultrafine particles by rainfall at a boreal site: observations and model estimations , 2006 .

[6]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Atmospheric sulphuric acid and aerosol formation: implications from atmospheric measurements for nucleation and early growth mechanisms , 2006 .

[7]  M. Kulmala,et al.  Cluster activation theory as an explanation of the linear dependence between formation rate of 3nm particles and sulphuric acid concentration , 2006 .

[8]  S. Rosser,et al.  Vienna-Type DMA of High Resolution and High Flow Rate , 2005 .

[9]  J. Mora,et al.  Molecular monodisperse mobility and mass standards from electrosprays of tetra-alkyl ammonium halides , 2005 .

[10]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Initial steps of aerosol growth , 2004 .

[11]  Hanna Vehkamäki,et al.  Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations , 2004 .

[12]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Effect of condensation rate enhancement factor on 3‐nm (diameter) particle formation in binary ion‐induced and homogeneous nucleation , 2003 .

[13]  L. Pirjola,et al.  Model studies on ion‐induced nucleation in the atmosphere , 2002 .

[14]  R. Turco,et al.  Ultrafine aerosol formation via ion‐mediated nucleation , 2000 .

[15]  J. Mora,et al.  Differential mobility analysis of molecular ions and nanometer particles , 1998 .

[16]  J. F. D. L. Mora,et al.  High resolution size analysis of nanoparticles and ions , 1998 .

[17]  M. Kulmala,et al.  A wide-range multi-channel Air Ion Spectrometer , 2007 .

[18]  M. Kulmala,et al.  Indoor and outdoor air ions and aerosol particles in the urban atmosphere of Helsinki: characteristics, sources and formation , 2007 .

[19]  R. Hillamo,et al.  Charged particle size distributions and analysis of particle formation events at the Finnish Antarctic research station Aboa , 2007 .

[20]  S. Haapanala,et al.  Hot-air balloon as a platform for boundary layer profile measurements during particle formation , 2007 .

[21]  R. Hillamo,et al.  Air Ion Measurements During a Cruise from Europe to Antarctica , 2007 .

[22]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Ion and particle number concentrations and size distributions along the Trans-Siberian railroad , 2007 .

[23]  K. Sellegri,et al.  Nucleation events detected at the high altitude site of the Puy de Dôme Research Station, France , 2007 .

[24]  S. Schiavon,et al.  Climate change 2007 : the physical science basis : contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[25]  H. Hakola,et al.  Ions and Charged Aerosol Particles in a Native Australian Eucalypt Forest , 2007 .

[26]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  On the existence of neutral atmospheric clusters , 2005 .

[27]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Performance of Vienna Type Differential Mobility Analyzer at 1.2-20 Nanometer , 1997 .

[28]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  MEASURED ATMOSPHERIC NEW PARTICLE FORMATION RATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEATION MECHANISMS , 1996 .

[29]  A. Berner,et al.  A new electromobility spectrometer for the measurement of aerosol size distributions in the size range from 1 to 1000 nm , 1991 .