Psychometric properties of non-specific electrodermal response frequency for a sample of male students.

In the present study data on the frequency of non-specific electrodermal responses (NSRs) are presented for a large and, with regard to sex, age and educational level, homogeneous sample of male students (n = 590). These data were obtained in 9 independent experiments in which NSRs were recorded under equivalent conditions. NSRs were scored as skin conductance changes greater than 0.02 muSiemens. A recording period of 5 min prior to experimental manipulations was chosen. A systematic comparison between the 9 studies, the distribution of NSRs for the total sample, as well as descriptive data for stabile and labile subgroups are presented. For 213 subjects NSR-frequency was recorded twice, with a retest interval of one day. For these subjects retest analyses and data on the degree of stability of the classification into stabile and labile groups are also presented. In the discussion the necessity to develop standardized scoring criteria for NSRs is emphasized.

[1]  P. Venables,et al.  Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. , 1981 .

[2]  G. Vossel.  Electrodermal lability, errors, and reaction times: an examination of the motor impulsivity hypothesis. , 1988, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[3]  Michael E. Dawson,et al.  Electrodermal lability and rapid vigilance decrement in a degraded stimulus continuous performance task. , 1987 .

[4]  G Vossel,et al.  Individual differences in resting heart rate and spontaneous electrodermal activity as predictors of attentional processes: effects on anticipatory heart rate deceleration and task performance. , 1990, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[5]  C. Horneman,et al.  Consistency of individual differences in non-specific electrodermal activity , 1979, Biological Psychology.

[6]  J. E. Lloyd,et al.  Electrodermal lability and dichotic listening. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[7]  P. Venables,et al.  Direct measurement of skin conductance: a proposal for standardization. , 1971, Psychophysiology.

[8]  M. Dawson,et al.  Psychophysiological correlates of electrodermal lability. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Esteve Freixa i Baqué,et al.  Reliability of electrodermal measures: a compilation , 1982, Biological Psychology.

[10]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  Electrodermal lability predicts presentation rate effects and stimulant drug effects on paired associate learning in hyperactive children. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[11]  Scoring criteria for electrodermal habituation: further research. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[12]  E. Katkin.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANIFEST ANXIETY AND TWO INDICES OF AUTONOMIC RESPONSE TO STRESS. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  K. G. Wilson,et al.  Electrodermal lability and visual information processing. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[14]  P. H. Venables,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – Mechanisms, Instrumentation, Recording Techniques, and Quantification of Responses , 1973 .

[15]  P. Venables.  Psychophysiology and Psychometrics , 1978 .