Cross-cultural quality comparison of online health information for elderly care on yahoo! answers

Given the increase in global aging population, popularity of social Q&A sites and the level of geriatric health concerns from family caregivers, it raises the uncertainty about the quality of health information on community Q&A sites for family caregivers of elderly. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of geriatric health information on social Questions and Answers (Q&A) sites: Yahoo! Answers from registered nurses’ perspective. A total of 60 question-andanswer sets are retrieved from regional Yahoo! Answers sites, including Australia, Canada, UK & Ireland, US, Hong Kong, Mainland China and Taiwan. A total of 126 English answers and 112 Chinese answers were examined by registered nurses and library professionals. Results show that the overall information quality provided in the Chinese group is relatively poorer than those of English especially in information quality dimensions such as Verifiability, Commercialisation and Completeness. Questioners form both the English and Chinese groups might possibly miss the best pieces of information and advices regarding the health concerns of their elderly family members since about 40% of the best answers they selected did not match health professionals’ picks.

[1]  V. Venable,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of the quality of online health-related information regarding schizophrenia. , 2011, Health & social work.

[2]  Peter Williams,et al.  Surfing for health: user evaluation of a health information website. Part one: Background and literature review. , 2002, Health information and libraries journal.

[3]  Y. Aharoni.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1992 .

[4]  Victoria L. Rubin,et al.  Discourse structure differences in lay and professional health communication , 2012, J. Documentation.

[5]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  L. A. Marshall,et al.  Health information: does quality count for the consumer? , 2006, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Jennie A. Abrahamson,et al.  Lay information mediary behavior uncovered: exploring how nonprofessionals seek health information for themselves and others online. , 2008, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[8]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  A model for online consumer health information quality , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Khalid S Khan,et al.  Quality of web-based medical information on stable COPD: comparison of non-commercial and commercial websites. , 2002, Health information and libraries journal.

[10]  Ruth A. Riley,et al.  Quality of Internet Geriatric Health Information: The GeriatricWeb Project , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[11]  Pnina Shachaf,et al.  The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library? , 2009, J. Documentation.

[12]  Adam Worrall,et al.  Quality evaluation of health answers in Yahoo! Answers: A comparison between experts and users , 2011, ASIST.

[13]  Peter Williams,et al.  Surfing for health: user evaluation of a health information website. Part two: fieldwork. , 2002, Health information and libraries journal.

[14]  Sue Childs,et al.  Developing health website quality assessment guidelines for the voluntary sector: outcomes from the Judge Project. , 2004, Health information and libraries journal.

[15]  Michael Khaled Bliemel,et al.  Consumer Satisfaction with Online Health Information Retrieval: A Model and Empirical Study , 2007 .

[16]  Pnina Fichman,et al.  A comparative assessment of answer quality on four question answering sites , 2011, J. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  Cultural influences on seeking quality health information: An exploratory study of the Korean community , 2012 .

[18]  Rich Gazan.  Advances in Information Science Social Q&A , 2011 .

[19]  Pierre Chauvin,et al.  Determinants of the frequency of online health information seeking: Results of a Web-based survey conducted in France in 2007 , 2010, Informatics for health & social care.

[20]  Samantha A. Adams,et al.  Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of "web 2.0": An inter-disciplinary literature and website review , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  Hong Huang,et al.  Interactions between English‐speaking and Chinese‐speaking users and librarians on social networking sites , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Alejandro R Jadad,et al.  Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  Kim Soojung,et al.  Questioners' credibility judgments of answers in a social question and answer site , 2010 .

[24]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  Social but safe? Quality and safety of diabetes-related online social networks , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..