Variation in polyp size estimation among endoscopists and impact on surveillance intervals.

BACKGROUND Accurate estimation of polyp size is important because it is used to determine the surveillance interval after polypectomy. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the variation and accuracy in polyp size estimation among endoscopists and the impact on surveillance intervals after polypectomy. DESIGN Web-based survey. PARTICIPANTS A total of 873 members of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. INTERVENTIONS Participants watched video recordings of 4 polypectomies and were asked to estimate the polyp sizes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Proportion of participants with polyp size estimates within 20% of the correct measurement and the frequency of incorrect surveillance intervals based on inaccurate size estimates. RESULTS Polyp size estimates were within 20% of the correct value for 1362 (48%) of 2812 estimates (range 39%-59% for the 4 polyps). Polyp size was overestimated by >20% in 889 estimates (32%, range 15%-49%) and underestimated by >20% in 561 (20%, range 4%-46%) estimates. Incorrect surveillance intervals because of overestimation or underestimation occurred in 272 (10%) of the 2812 estimates (range 5%-14%). Participants in a private practice setting overestimated the size of 3 or of all 4 polyps by >20% more often than participants in an academic setting (difference = 7%; 95% confidence interval, 1%-11%). LIMITATIONS Survey design with the use of video clips. CONCLUSION Substantial overestimation and underestimation of polyp size occurs with visual estimation leading to incorrect surveillance intervals in 10% of cases. Our findings support routine use of measurement tools to improve polyp size estimates.

[1]  D. Han,et al.  Graduated injection needles and snares for polypectomy are useful for measuring colorectal polyp size. , 2011, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[2]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[3]  M Aickin,et al.  The difference in colon polyp size before and after removal. , 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  J. Shim,et al.  Cold Snare Polypectomy Vs. Cold Forceps Polypectomy Using Double-Biopsy Technique for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Study , 2013, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[5]  C. Margulies,et al.  The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. , 1997, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  C. Margulies,et al.  How accurate are endoscopic estimates of size? , 1994, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[7]  R. Markert,et al.  Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate? , 1996, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

[8]  D. Rex,et al.  Tips for Better Colonoscopy From Two Experts , 2012, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[9]  R. Sampliner,et al.  Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable? , 1993, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[10]  E T Stewart,et al.  Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.