Intellectual structure evolution of open access research observed through correlation index of keyword centrality

This study captured intellectual structures of open access by time frame using the pathfinder keyword network analysis method. 1998 papers published on Web of Science from 2005 to 2019 were divided into 3-year units, and keyword pathfinder networks were analyzed in five time segments. Thus, this study examined the time series changes of intellectual structure and keyword centrality. In addition, by analyzing the correlation index of keyword centrality between time segments, this study examined how long the similarities of the intellectual structure persisted and how it has changed. As a result, a weak correlation (r = 0.10 ~ r = 0.49) was obtained from the observations in 2005 for 9 years; however, the correlation decreased sharply since 2014 (r = − 0.06 ~ r = 0.00). New research topics have emerged that have not been highlighted in centrality, such as article processing charge, altmetrics, and research data. The scope of research has changed as subjects such as document delivery that showed high centrality initially, disappeared.

[1]  Aceil Al-Khatib,et al.  Protecting Authors from Predatory Journals and Publishers , 2016 .

[2]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval studies: an author co-citation analysis, 1987-1997 , 1999, J. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Dengsheng Wu,et al.  Mapping the Research Trends by Co-word Analysis Based on Keywords from Funded Project , 2016 .

[4]  Jane Cho,et al.  Intellectual structure of the institutional repository field: A co-word analysis , 2014, J. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo,et al.  Dynamics of the evolution of the strategy concept 1962–2008: a co-word analysis , 2012 .

[7]  Eun G. Park Perspectives on Access to Electronic Journals for Long-Term Preservation , 2007 .

[8]  Yael Kovo Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) , 2016 .

[9]  Joachim Schöpfel,et al.  Document supply and open access: an international survey on grey literature , 2006 .

[10]  이화여자대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과 Time Series Analysis of Intellectual Structure and Research Trend Changes in the Field of Library and Information Science: 2003 to 2017 , 2018 .

[11]  정동열,et al.  저자서지결합분석에 의한 문헌정보학의 지적구조 분석에 관한 연구 , 2013 .

[12]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Exploring possibilities to use bibliometric data to monitor gold open access publishing at the national level , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  이재윤 A novel clustering method for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field , 2006 .

[14]  Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveira,et al.  Scientific Production on Open Access: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis in the Academic and Scientific Context , 2016, Publ..

[15]  EunKyung Chung,et al.  Domain Analysis on the Field of Open Access by Co-Word Analysis , 2013 .

[16]  Howard D. White,et al.  Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Masao Fuketa,et al.  Ranking of field association terms using Co-word analysis , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[18]  Lee Jae-Yun,et al.  A Study on the Network Generation Methods for Examining the Intellectual Structure of Knowledge Domains , 2006 .

[19]  Shengnan Wu,et al.  Study on themes and authors’ influence of open access in China , 2014, Scientometrics.

[20]  Charles W. Bailey,et al.  Transforming Scholarly Publishing through Open Access: A Bibliography , 2010 .

[21]  이재윤,et al.  계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구 , 2006 .

[22]  J. Meredith,et al.  The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management—1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis , 2009 .

[23]  Vitor Taga,et al.  Research Articles about Open Access Indexed by Scopus: A Content Analysis , 2016, Publ..

[24]  Cleusa Pavan,et al.  Article processing charge (APC) for publishing open access articles: the Brazilian scenario , 2018, Scientometrics.

[25]  Ricardo Arencibia Jorge,et al.  A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation , 2016, Learn. Publ..

[26]  Jane Cho The Trends of Media Coverage about Libraries in Korea: Using Semantic Network Analysis of Portal News , 2018, Libri.

[27]  O. B. Onyancha Open Research Data in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Bibliometric Study Using the Data Citation Index , 2016 .

[28]  Ivana Hebrang Grgić,et al.  Altmetric and Bibliometric Scores: Does Open Access Matter? , 2016 .

[29]  Jae Yun Lee A Comparison Study on the Weighted Network Centrality Measures of tnet and WNET , 2013 .

[31]  Kristin Yiotis,et al.  The Open Access Initiative: A New Paradigm for Scholarly Communications , 2005 .

[32]  Aurelia Magdalena Pisoschi,et al.  Is open access the solution to increase the impact of scientific journals? , 2016, Scientometrics.

[33]  EunKyung Chung,et al.  Domain Analysis on Economics by Utilizing Cocitation Analysis of Multiple Authorship , 2012 .

[34]  Francisco Segado-Boj,et al.  Attitudes toward Open Access, Open Peer Review, and Altmetrics among Contributors to Spanish Scholarly Journals , 2018, Journal of Scholarly Publishing.

[35]  Michael Szell,et al.  Multirelational organization of large-scale social networks in an online world , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Min Song,et al.  Examining the Intellectual Structure of a Medical Informatics Journal with Author Co-citation Analysis and Co-word Analysis , 2013 .

[37]  Dengsheng Wu,et al.  Early identification of intellectual structure based on co-word analysis from research grants , 2019, Scientometrics.