Towards the delineation of the ancestral eutherian genome organization: comparative genome maps of human and the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) generated by chromosome painting

This study presents a whole–genome comparison of human and a representative of the Afrotherian clade, the African elephant, generated by reciprocal Zoo–FISH. An analysis of Afrotheria genomes is of special interest, because recent DNA sequence comparisons identify them as the oldest placental mammalian clade. Complete sets of whole–chromosome specific painting probes for the African elephant and human were constructed by degenerate oligonucleotide–primed PCR amplification of flow–sorted chromosomes. Comparative genome maps are presented based on their hybridization patterns. These maps show that the elephant has a moderately rearranged chromosome complement when compared to humans. The human paint probes identified 53 evolutionary conserved segments on the 27 autosomal elephant chromosomes and the X chromosome. Reciprocal experiments with elephant probes delineated 68 conserved segments in the human genome. The comparison with a recent aardvark and elephant Zoo–FISH study delineates new chromosomal traits which link the two Afrotherian species phylogenetically. In the absence of any morphological evidence the chromosome painting data offer the first non–DNA sequence support for an Afrotherian clade. The comparative human and elephant genome maps provide new insights into the karyotype organization of the proto–afrotherian, the ancestor of extant placental mammals, which most probably consisted of 2n = 46 chromosomes.

[1]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[2]  Stephen J O'Brien,et al.  Evolution of mammalian genome organization inferred from comparative gene mapping , 2001, Genome Biology.

[3]  Fengtang Yang,et al.  Use of flow-sorted canine chromosomes in the assignment of canine linkage, radiation hybrid, and syntenic groups to chromosomes: refinement and verification of the comparative chromosome map for dog and human. , 2000, Genomics.

[4]  J. Wienberg,et al.  Defining the ancestral karyotype of all primates by multidirectional chromosome painting between tree shrews, lemurs and humans , 1999, Chromosoma.

[5]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Comparative genomics: tracking chromosome evolution in the family Ursidae using reciprocal chromosome painting , 1999, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[6]  M. Novacek Mammalian phylogeny: shaking the tree. , 1992, Nature.

[7]  M. Ferguson-Smith Genetic Analysis by Chromosome Sorting and Painting: Phylogenetic and Diagnostic Applications , 1997, European journal of human genetics : EJHG.

[8]  H. Hameister,et al.  ZOO-FISH analysis in insectivores: “Evolution extols the virtue of the status quo” , 1998, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[9]  H. Scherthan,et al.  Emerging patterns of comparative genome organization in some mammalian species as revealed by Zoo-FISH. , 1998, Genome research.

[10]  R. Martin Primate origins and evolution : a phylogenetic reconstruction , 1990 .

[11]  M A Ferguson-Smith,et al.  Reciprocal chromosome painting among human, aardvark, and elephant (superorder Afrotheria) reveals the likely eutherian ancestral karyotype , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Diana J. Kao,et al.  Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals , 2001, Nature.

[13]  W. Vogel,et al.  ZOO-FISH analysis: cat and human karyotypes closely resemble the putative ancestral mammalian karyotype , 1995, Chromosome Research.

[14]  M. Clark,et al.  Comparative genomics: the key to understanding the human genome project , 1999, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[15]  N. Archidiacono,et al.  Molecular cytogenetic dissection of human chromosomes 3 and 21 evolution. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  A. Hagemeijer,et al.  Extensive cross-homology between the long and the short arm of chromosome 16 may explain leukemic inversions and translocations. , 1992, Blood.

[17]  V. Eisenmann,et al.  Geology and palaeontology of the Upper Miocene Toros-Menalla hominid locality, Chad , 2002, Nature.

[18]  H. Hameister,et al.  A comparative ZOO-FISH analysis in bats elucidates the phylogenetic relationships between Megachiroptera and five microchiropteran families , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[19]  M A Ferguson-Smith,et al.  Conservation of human vs. feline genome organization revealed by reciprocal chromosome painting. , 1997, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[20]  N. Carter,et al.  Chromosome specific paints from a high resolution flow karyotype of the mouse , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[21]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Molecular dating and biogeography of the early placental mammal radiation. , 2001, The Journal of heredity.

[22]  Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome , 2002, Nature.

[23]  H. Scherthan,et al.  A comparative map of the porcine and human genomes demonstrates ZOO-FISH and gene mapping-based chromosomal homologies , 1996, Mammalian Genome.

[24]  N. Carter,et al.  Reciprocal chromosome painting reveals detailed regions of conserved synteny between the karyotypes of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) and human. , 1999, Genomics.

[25]  W. Vogel,et al.  Zoo-FISH analysis: the American mink Mustela vison) closely resembles the cat karyotype , 1997, Chromosome Research.

[26]  R. Martin Classification and phylogenetic reconstruction , 1989 .

[27]  N. Georgiadis,et al.  Genetic Evidence for Two Species of Elephant in Africa , 2001, Science.

[28]  Diana J. Kao,et al.  Molecular evidence for multiple origins of Insectivora and for a new order of endemic African insectivore mammals. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  D. Haig,et al.  A brief history of human autosomes. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[30]  J. Wienberg,et al.  Insights into Mammalian Genome Organization and Evolution by Molecular Cytogenetics , 2000 .

[31]  M. Ferguson-Smith,et al.  Cross-species chromosome painting between human and marsupial directly demonstrates the ancient region of the mammalian X , 1999, Mammalian Genome.

[32]  J W Gray,et al.  Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. , 2002 .

[34]  E. Eichler,et al.  Masquerading repeats: paralogous pitfalls of the human genome. , 1998, Genome research.

[35]  J. Graves,et al.  Marsupial genetics and genomics. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[36]  W. Murphy,et al.  Resolution of the Early Placental Mammal Radiation Using Bayesian Phylogenetics , 2001, Science.

[37]  R. Stanyon,et al.  Chromosome painting reveals that galagos have highly derived karyotypes. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[38]  B. Dutrillaux,et al.  Chromosome homologies between man and mountain zebra (Equus zebra hartmannae) and description of a new ancestral synteny involving sequences homologous to human chromosomes 4 and 8 , 2001, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[39]  E. Hagelberg,et al.  Molecular and morphological evidence on the phylogeny of the Elephantidae , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  N. Carter,et al.  Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. , 1992, Genomics.

[41]  M. Stanhope,et al.  Endemic African mammals shake the phylogenetic tree , 1997, Nature.

[42]  J. Womack,et al.  Homologies between human and dolphin chromosomes detected by heterologous chromosome painting , 1998, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[43]  A. Jauch,et al.  Reconstruction of genomic rearrangements in great apes and gibbons by chromosome painting. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  R. Korstanje,et al.  Complete homology maps of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and human by reciprocal chromosome painting , 1999, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[45]  J. Wienberg,et al.  Comparative chromosome painting defines the high rate of karyotype changes between pigs and bovids , 2001, Mammalian Genome.

[46]  K. Benirschke,et al.  Comparative cytogenetics of the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) and Asiatic elephant (Elephas maximus) , 2001, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[47]  L. Iannuzzi,et al.  Comparison of the human with the sheep genomes by use of human chromosome-specific painting probes , 1999, Mammalian Genome.

[48]  H. Scherthan,et al.  Chromosomal homeologies between human, harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) and the putative ancestral carnivore karyotype revealed by Zoo-FISH , 1997, Chromosoma.

[49]  H. Scherthan,et al.  Zoo-FISH delineates conserved chromosomal segments in horse and man , 1996, Chromosome Research.

[50]  N. Carter Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting. , 1994, Cytometry.

[51]  Fengtang Yang,et al.  A complete comparative chromosome map for the dog, red fox, and human and its integration with canine genetic maps. , 1999, Genomics.

[52]  D. Milan,et al.  Human and porcine correspondence of chromosome segments using bidirectional chromosome painting. , 1996, Genomics.

[53]  A. Jauch,et al.  Molecular cytotaxonomy of primates by chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization. , 1990, Genomics.

[54]  H. Scherthan,et al.  Zoo-fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of human and Indian muntjac karyotypes (Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis) reveals satellite DNA clusters at the margins of conserved syntenic segments , 1997, Chromosome Research.